DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-06-2010, 08:48 PM
  #1  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
greggpenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

A (nice) experienced tuner prepared a new BIN for my 383 stroker. (1989 Corvette.) He wrote the BIN using TunerCat. I downloaded TunerProRT to view/burn the BIN (with BURN2) to a chip. Because TunerProRT didn't appear to download with and XDF files, I went back to their website and downloaded the $6E.XDF file.

After viewing/discussion what I saw with the (TunerCAT) tuner, we saw something weird. Setting the transmission to manual in TunerCat doesn't result in that flag getting set in TunerPro. Setting the transmission to manual in TunerPro causes VATs to get enabled.

IOW, it doesn't look like the flags "line up". We couldn't find any other desrepancy but,,,it also looked like other automatic transmission functions were disabled so he said to burn it as-is (even w/o the manual flag set) for my ZF6 transmission.

Thoughts? Ideas for the discrepancy?
Thanks
gp
Old 08-10-2010, 11:02 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,771
Received 375 Likes on 303 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

That is weird. I never used TunerCat but a bin file is a bin file, and as long as the XDF or whatever "reading" file used to "read" the bin is correct for that file, it shouldnt matter what system you use. So I would expect Tunercat changes to show up on Tunerpro and vice verus

What base BIN are you using, ARAP?

In any case, I'd compare all items to make sure nothing else changed and reset the flags for your setup if you are planning on using TunerPro RT to tune this car.
Old 08-19-2010, 09:56 PM
  #3  
TGO Supporter

 
Mangus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

Is 6E the proper XDF for your vehicle? It's hard for us to know since you didn't tell us what vehicle this is for, what ECM it has in it, etc.
Old 08-19-2010, 10:25 PM
  #4  
Junior Member

Thread Starter
 
greggpenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

Originally Posted by Mangus
Is 6E the proper XDF for your vehicle? It's hard for us to know since you didn't tell us what vehicle this is for, what ECM it has in it, etc.
My apology. I have an 89 Corvette which uses the $6E XDF as it's definition. The person helping me prep a start-up BIN file used TunerCAT.

I called TunerCAT who said the error must be in the TunerPro definition file. I'm not sure TunerPro has a tech line.
Old 08-19-2010, 10:26 PM
  #5  
TGO Supporter

 
Mangus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

TunerPro doesn't have a tech line. You get what you pay for (and I suppose John at TunerCat is getting the opposite?). Do feel free to email me the bin file and I'll take a look.
Old 08-19-2010, 11:34 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,771
Received 375 Likes on 303 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

The car is running with the new bin, I assume you made the changes in the flags to simulate the tunercat file? The bin looked fine to me for a starter on that motor. It doesnt take much to get a bin to idle and part throttle run on most motors, but WOT is always hard to get right with guessing at first time.
Old 08-19-2010, 11:36 PM
  #7  
TGO Supporter

 
Mangus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file

If the car is indeed a manual, use APYP instead of ARAP. APYP is the manual equiv of ARAP.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZZ42Fast
TPI
3
08-30-2015 02:39 PM
BMmonteSS
TBI
446
10-24-2011 10:58 AM
Metaldrgn
DIY PROM
2
08-11-2005 03:02 AM
Ronny
DIY PROM
4
06-21-2005 11:50 PM
Vortex91
DIY PROM
4
04-29-2005 10:58 AM



Quick Reply: XDF for $6E didn't "see" flags correctly from TunerCAT BIN file



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:34 AM.