DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-2008, 07:57 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
TheScaryOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW
TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

I've been searching for an answer on this for a few days, and either I can't find it, or I'm a moron and have been staring at it and not seeing it, but I can't figure out for the life of me how to get my car spitting out 8192 Baud data.

My car is a 1987 IROC-Z, 700-R4, 350 TPI. Engine/drivetrain bone stock except for a performance tranny rebuild and a LS1 aluminum shaft.

I have the Moates ALDU1+CABL1 Combo and am using the latest version of TunerPro RT.

People say you can run 8192 baud on a 165 ecm running $32, but no one says how. The closest I've come says that the ecm in ALDL mode will spit out 25 cells of 160 baud data, and then look for a signal to switch up to 8192. I know this has something to do with the 10k resistor between pins A and B, and I know it has to be there when I start, but some people say to take it off (the equivalent of flipping the little switch to open), some people say to leave it on, others say it has to do with time. I have no idea.

Another thing is, which ALDL definitions file do I use? If the ECM starts with 160, should I use that? All of the $32B definitions I've found specify 160 baud, whereas it seems I can only find 8192 baud in the $6E definitions.

Any help is much appreciated!
Old 03-22-2008, 09:10 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07
Re: TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

165 ECM should get you a scan every .1 sec (tenth). Try datamaster. Thats 25 different cells every tenth sec. $32 or $32B.
Old 03-22-2008, 09:13 AM
  #3  
Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
 
tequilaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 319
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

In your *.ads file, is the 160 baud box checked in the ALDL Definition Header?

If so, try unchecking it. Maybe you're using a $32 ads file, instead of a $32B ads file. Are you sure its a $32B bin and not $32. Just some things to check.

I've never had an issue with using $32B and 8192 baud mode. With my akm cable and TunerProRT it works just fine and always has. I assume that the cable has the 10 k resistor built in, but I haven't checked it to be sure.
Old 03-22-2008, 09:59 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
TheScaryOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: L98 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 BW
Re: TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

Well, I got it to connect using the $6E ads file, and using a $32B (8192 Baud) file I found on moates.

The $32B file gives me a few screwy readings, like my CTS reading -40.00 degrees, which is normal if I have a bad CTS, but I don't. The $6E ads is reading my CTS fine but it seems less verbose than the one for $32B, that, and it *is* for a different mask than what I'm running.

Maybe I just need to keep searching for a good ads file.

Last edited by TheScaryOne; 03-22-2008 at 10:03 AM.
Old 03-22-2008, 12:28 PM
  #5  
TGO Supporter

 
Mangus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Re: TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

Originally Posted by TheScaryOne
Well, I got it to connect using the $6E ads file, and using a $32B (8192 Baud) file I found on moates.

The $32B file gives me a few screwy readings, like my CTS reading -40.00 degrees, which is normal if I have a bad CTS, but I don't. The $6E ads is reading my CTS fine but it seems less verbose than the one for $32B, that, and it *is* for a different mask than what I'm running.

Maybe I just need to keep searching for a good ads file.
Edit the CTS item in the 32B ADS to match the 6E ADS CTS item.

32B and 6E share nearly idential definitions.
Old 03-23-2008, 06:55 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
pandin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 1,091
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 86 vette
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.07
Re: TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B

$32, $32B, and $6E all, are a little bit different. They will all use a different xdf file in tuner pro. If you get them mixed up, your readings will be odd.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
05-24-2018 01:02 PM
sreZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
10-22-2015 08:21 AM
tmellott89
DIY PROM
7
10-14-2015 02:06 PM
ULTM8Z
DIY PROM
12
10-02-2015 01:25 PM
MitcherNeaf
DIY PROM
3
09-24-2015 09:23 PM



Quick Reply: TunerPro Datalogging and a 165 $32B



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 AM.