Ronny

iTrader: (1)

I did a search and found nothing. Checked the help topics in TP and found nothing. I believe I loaded the latest release of TP on 10/2007.

How does one do above? My are a bit ragged. I understand each tune is differrent but should they not have some smooth lines rather than peaks and valleys?

91chevz71

I just smoothen by hand. I know it has a smoothen feature in the tool box- I just prefer to do it myself. Besides, I don't know how to do it...lol sorry

Ronny

iTrader: (1)

AH HA ! found it. now next question is a value used? I suspect 1.00 will work.

As far as doing by hand do you just interpolate between adjoining cells(up-down-right-left)?

Ronny

iTrader: (1)

I used .99 on value and it changed little. maybe I should use a smaller value like .80? range is 0-.99...

rhuarc31

yes, and you can even select just a portion of the table and smooth it, there is a minimum selection, but not sure what the spec is on that.

Ronny

iTrader: (1)

let me give an example of my 1800 rpm row 20-100 map. I will round to whole #.

27 27 21 27 33 36 43 42 56 55 72 66 69 73

some of these cells have been VE learned in in a multitude of logs and some not. anyone feel free to suggest what you may change.

VE learn has suggested I need a whole lot of fuel 2600-3200 rpms at 35-70 map with numbers as high as 96-99. no vac leaks and a new heated GM NB sensor. charcoal canister disabled and no EGR(and in .bin). No DE either.

Six_Shooter

iTrader: (2)

I haven't found this, where is it? or how does it work?

1tpi

I use .7 seem to work well

chevyz71man

The lower the number the more smoothing.. It is in the toolbox.

90c350

I would suggest that you do your smoothing while looking at the graph of the ve table and clicking on each inividual point and then dragging that area to where you want. That way you can see what map/rpm point you are smoothing without going over board in another area. Just my thoughts.

RBob

iTrader: (1)

Have you tried the smoothing built into the WUD? IT can be used stand-alone by starting a VE Learn then stopping it. The smaller the smoothing factor the less smoothing is done.

RBob.

Ronny

iTrader: (1)

I have not done any smoothing cept by hand and intepolating. But did play with it in TP yesterday and again will check out WUD as well. I looked at the graph and it was pretty rugged as a result of VE Learn only. Apparently the unlearned cells were causing the ruggedness so I wanted to make it look pretty(aka smooth).

So it seems you are saying the factor in WUD is opposite of TP ??

RBob

iTrader: (1)

Yes, in the WUD a value of 0 is no smoothing. With an increase in smoothing as the factor is increased. I like starting with an 8 or 12 when first doing VE Learns. Then as the VE table comes together reduce the factor to the 6 to 4 range.

Note that the smoothing code in the WUD is different then that found in TP. With that the smooth factoring is also different.

RBob.