730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 357ci Stealth Ram - Under Pressure
Transmission: Built 700r4/Pro Yank 3400 Extreme
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.27
730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
I am having some issues forcing open loop idle (idle in PE) with the '730 ecm.
I have read other threads and came up with the following;
Enrich Power Enable %TPS
Set both the 1200rpm and 400rpm values to 0 to enable PE at idle.
Enrich Power Change to AFR vs RPM
Change the idle area of this table to offset the fuel added from the Enrich Power Change to AFR vs Temp table.
Problem:
I don't think it is going into PE(effectively open loop) at idle as the BLM/INT move around the the 02 volts bouce around from the loads of gas added from the idle BLM/INT.
When I disable closed loop to tune with open loop all the time the car idles nice, doesn't stink as bad, and the 02 volts stay at .1mv
Thanks.
I have read other threads and came up with the following;
Enrich Power Enable %TPS
Set both the 1200rpm and 400rpm values to 0 to enable PE at idle.
Enrich Power Change to AFR vs RPM
Change the idle area of this table to offset the fuel added from the Enrich Power Change to AFR vs Temp table.
Problem:
I don't think it is going into PE(effectively open loop) at idle as the BLM/INT move around the the 02 volts bouce around from the loads of gas added from the idle BLM/INT.
When I disable closed loop to tune with open loop all the time the car idles nice, doesn't stink as bad, and the 02 volts stay at .1mv
Thanks.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
Re: 730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
You don't use "PE" Power Enrichment at idle.
Set the PE tables back to the old settings and shift your o2 constants at idle.
Set the PE tables back to the old settings and shift your o2 constants at idle.
Last edited by JP86SS; 06-15-2007 at 05:57 AM.
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 357ci Stealth Ram - Under Pressure
Transmission: Built 700r4/Pro Yank 3400 Extreme
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.27
Re: 730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
The car still stinks like fuel pretty bad at .3mv swing points but surges at .1mv swing points..
Thanks.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
Re: 730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
Is the cam your running in your sig? If so, you might have too much overlap at idle. Thats what I'm going through right now.
too much overlap means unspent fuel and air is being blown through the engine. the o2 sensor only thinks its running lean, which it isn't. So it richens it up, making the problem even worse.
Right now I'm going through the process of leaning it up with the VE tables. I've increased the "minimum temp for closed loop" to be 154*C so the code doesn't try to correct. Since the o2 sensor doesn't work at idle due to the cam, I'm going off of smell. Does this sound like what your going through? Mine was running so rich it would seriously gag you and burn your eyes. Its been much better since I lowered the VE in the "Idle volumetric effeciency table".
too much overlap means unspent fuel and air is being blown through the engine. the o2 sensor only thinks its running lean, which it isn't. So it richens it up, making the problem even worse.
Right now I'm going through the process of leaning it up with the VE tables. I've increased the "minimum temp for closed loop" to be 154*C so the code doesn't try to correct. Since the o2 sensor doesn't work at idle due to the cam, I'm going off of smell. Does this sound like what your going through? Mine was running so rich it would seriously gag you and burn your eyes. Its been much better since I lowered the VE in the "Idle volumetric effeciency table".
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 357ci Stealth Ram - Under Pressure
Transmission: Built 700r4/Pro Yank 3400 Extreme
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.27
Re: 730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
Thats exactly what i'm going through and why i'm trying to force open loop at idle only.
The car is my daily driver so i'd like to be able to run closed loop during cruise conditions so highway fuel mode works. May not be possible though.
As for the VE Table, i'm not sure how much lower I can go in the idle VE area. The cam idles around 60kpa at 900rpm. I've been trying to tune the idle VE area in open loop based on smell but i'm scared to go to lean. VE in the idle area is currently set at 35%. Idle spark advance is 28*.
Thanks.
The car is my daily driver so i'd like to be able to run closed loop during cruise conditions so highway fuel mode works. May not be possible though.
As for the VE Table, i'm not sure how much lower I can go in the idle VE area. The cam idles around 60kpa at 900rpm. I've been trying to tune the idle VE area in open loop based on smell but i'm scared to go to lean. VE in the idle area is currently set at 35%. Idle spark advance is 28*.
Thanks.
Last edited by mike1986fyrbird; 06-18-2007 at 02:07 PM.
#6
Re: 730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
The BLM & INT can only remove so much fuel.
Once you go to a bigger cam with a 110lsa and raise the idle.
You add a lot of fuel that the engine just can't use at idle due to the lowered vol. eff.. The lower efficiency more than offsets the excess o2 in the exhaust so you end up with excess fuel.
Check one of your logs and see if the blm/int are bottomed out.
You can also change your blm min to 96 which gm did in some bins.
And try 25% VE.
The actual number isn't really an issue unless it drives your PW less than 1.5ms at idle. In which case you will then have to tweak the low PW offset table too.
You could raise your idle another 50-100 rpm also. And you have plenty of timing, if not too much.
I can already see I'm going to have to add lots of notes to S_aujpv4 so that people don't go to open loop idle and stay there by mistake.
Once you go to a bigger cam with a 110lsa and raise the idle.
You add a lot of fuel that the engine just can't use at idle due to the lowered vol. eff.. The lower efficiency more than offsets the excess o2 in the exhaust so you end up with excess fuel.
Check one of your logs and see if the blm/int are bottomed out.
You can also change your blm min to 96 which gm did in some bins.
And try 25% VE.
The actual number isn't really an issue unless it drives your PW less than 1.5ms at idle. In which case you will then have to tweak the low PW offset table too.
You could raise your idle another 50-100 rpm also. And you have plenty of timing, if not too much.
I can already see I'm going to have to add lots of notes to S_aujpv4 so that people don't go to open loop idle and stay there by mistake.
#7
Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: 730' - Problems forcing idle PE(open loop idle only)
There is a constant at L8601 that must be set to 00 and a minimum MAP at L85FF must be set below your idle MAP.
If you use Tunercat and your ECM file is older than Bsomething the constant (L85FF) was backwards. Good luck.
If you use Tunercat and your ECM file is older than Bsomething the constant (L85FF) was backwards. Good luck.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post