EBL vs MAF TBI
04-27-2007, 07:55 AM
#51
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MAF TBI
One of the things about EBL is that its based on the C3 ECM. RBob would have to add an addressable module or something to allow it to interface with the MAF. You could use a Botch MAF or a freq. to voltage converter with a later MAF, but the resolution is very coarse. At idle, its very difficult to hold one AFR because the reported flow ratchets up and down rather changing smoothly.
04-27-2007, 08:42 AM
#53
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Re: EBL vs MAF TBI
The 93 TBI truck PCMs where among the first to appear with the needed hardware for the conversion.
04-27-2007, 09:27 AM
#54
Re: EBL vs MAF TBI
The 16168625 is the '93 TBI truck PCM. The 16196395 and 16197427 are the '94 TBI truck PCM's and the 16197427 and 16156930 are the '95 TBI truck PCM's. The 16197427 is the most popular and has been hacked the most although the differences are slight. This would be the preferred PCM to me although all would the ones listed work.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
02-26-2016 02:57 PM
