EBL-Learn VE Q?
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 227 Likes
on
212 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Lean Cr: in highway Lean Cruise mode.
Good for gas mileage. This is both an increase in AFR and added SA timing to compensate. It is able to take an engine from 26.4 MPG on a stock ECM, to 32 MPG on an EBL setup.
RBob.
Good for gas mileage. This is both an increase in AFR and added SA timing to compensate. It is able to take an engine from 26.4 MPG on a stock ECM, to 32 MPG on an EBL setup.
RBob.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I sure need to work with my tune because my mileage since the 3.73 rear gears went down a bit. But I am running in open loop also. Are there advantages running in OL or CL when having a mild engine such as mine. [LT4 stock cam] Especially in regards to fuel mileage?
#4
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 94 9c1 Caprice
Engine: LT1 (3-fity)
Transmission: 4L60E reBUILT
Axle/Gears: 3:08 POSI (out)
For mileage you want to be in Closed Loop so that you can use Lean Cruise mode. Which will be pretty easy to adjust with the EBL setup.
#5
i ran OL with my prior 7747 and tunercat for a while as an experiment. fuel mileage sufferred significantly. car ran better but that was due to imperfect tune. since gas was $3+/gal(ethanol blend) i came back to CL. with EBL i am confident i can run CL (enjoy the fuel mileage), and possibly command a slightly diff stoich(enrichen a tad) and see if car runs better.
#6
Supreme Member
Guys,
RBob and I connected my VAFPR vacuum port this weekend, so now I am using vacuum assist to modify fueling. My gas mileage went from 20 up to23.5 mpg. All without Lean Cruise Mode enabled yet. The throttle response is pretty great.
RBob and I connected my VAFPR vacuum port this weekend, so now I am using vacuum assist to modify fueling. My gas mileage went from 20 up to23.5 mpg. All without Lean Cruise Mode enabled yet. The throttle response is pretty great.
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I checked at fill up today and averaged 19.59 with mixed driving and only a few WOT runs. This is if the DD speedo box is correct as it still has low speed spikes at times. I keep the speed to 65 on the interstate which is 2000 rpm's with the 3.73 rear.
It sounds like I have some work to do with the tune. The first step being what sounds like to start running closed loop again.
Dominic.........that's good news about the VAFPR. Glad to hear it works that well.
DM
It sounds like I have some work to do with the tune. The first step being what sounds like to start running closed loop again.
Dominic.........that's good news about the VAFPR. Glad to hear it works that well.
DM
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,122
Received 429 Likes
on
369 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
My last tank got me 551.8 miles on 30.6 gallons of gas. That is 18.0 MPG. I was doing roughly a 60/40 split, city/highway. That was running both A/Cs on High due to our 100+* heatwave.
#9
Supreme Member
DM,
It really runs very nice. RBob can chime in since he rode in it. The throttle response is really impressive. The accelerator pedal feels "stiffer" because it doesn't need as much movement to get the same response.
It really runs very nice. RBob can chime in since he rode in it. The throttle response is really impressive. The accelerator pedal feels "stiffer" because it doesn't need as much movement to get the same response.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
That's cool............how does it improve the throttle response?
#11
Supreme Member
DM,
RBob and I talked about why using a VAFPR would enhance throttle response.
Bob seems to feel that by lowering the pressure at PT, of course the PW will become wider. This means that the fuel is delivered in a pulse over a longer duration rather than dumping it all at one time. Possibly makes for more even delivery of the fuel. Also less fuel needs to be atomized at any one point in time possibly creating a better mixture. It also may help explain the improved fuel mileage. The injectors may be operating at a more efficient duty cycle over the rpm band. This is all conjecture on my part and perhaps RBob and Fast355 would add what they think.
RBob and I talked about why using a VAFPR would enhance throttle response.
Bob seems to feel that by lowering the pressure at PT, of course the PW will become wider. This means that the fuel is delivered in a pulse over a longer duration rather than dumping it all at one time. Possibly makes for more even delivery of the fuel. Also less fuel needs to be atomized at any one point in time possibly creating a better mixture. It also may help explain the improved fuel mileage. The injectors may be operating at a more efficient duty cycle over the rpm band. This is all conjecture on my part and perhaps RBob and Fast355 would add what they think.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Dominic.............thanks for the reply. I am just glad to hear that it works well if needed.
Right now I cannot get the car to go into Closed loop again. I only ran the 1st maybe 4 out of almost 80 bins on closed loop. Even after reading/searching most of last night I must be missing something. I have the enable temp set back down to where it was in the stock EBL bin. What else would it be? The stock o2 is showing that it's reading.
Thanks DM
Right now I cannot get the car to go into Closed loop again. I only ran the 1st maybe 4 out of almost 80 bins on closed loop. Even after reading/searching most of last night I must be missing something. I have the enable temp set back down to where it was in the stock EBL bin. What else would it be? The stock o2 is showing that it's reading.
Thanks DM
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
#15
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 227 Likes
on
212 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Check the transient open loop TPS% quals. Both should be set to 100% (Transient OpnLp - Open TPS% Delta & Transient OpnLp - Close TPS% Delta).
The other area is the go to closed loop O2 values. If the O2 value doesn't go higher or lower then these values it won't go in to closed loop. (Closed Loop - O2 Upper/Lower Go into closed loop).
There are also some timers that you may want to double check.
RBob.
The other area is the go to closed loop O2 values. If the O2 value doesn't go higher or lower then these values it won't go in to closed loop. (Closed Loop - O2 Upper/Lower Go into closed loop).
There are also some timers that you may want to double check.
RBob.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thanks for your help guys as it was not a program issue. I noticed today when running the WUD that the O2 was not going to it's full normal range and then totally stopped moving at around 700 mv. So up went the car and found of all things the O2 connector (harness side of course ) melted against the header. After a parts run and reconnection it went into CL finally. Boy those oem O2's sure take a while to heat up just idling.
I guess it was just a coincidence that I tried CL about the time it went out. Must have moved the wire around when changing oil last week.
It's kinda like the more I fix the more I tear up.
DM
I guess it was just a coincidence that I tried CL about the time it went out. Must have moved the wire around when changing oil last week.
It's kinda like the more I fix the more I tear up.
DM
#18
Supreme Member
DM,
Achems Razor states that: All things being equal, the most simple > > > explanation is probably the correct explanation."
Achems Razor states that: All things being equal, the most simple > > > explanation is probably the correct explanation."
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ga
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73