Autoprom Issue
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Autoprom Issue
I am having trouble with the emulation function in TunerPro RT with the Autoprom hardware. I am helping tune a 93 Z28 (DA3 mask) and we have had several issues with emulation since we first started using this stuff. At this time, we cannot get emulation to work while connected to the ALDL.
On some of our early test drives with emulation enabled, everything seemed normal early in the test drive, but after 2-3 miles it seemed that "online" changes were not affecting the performance of the engine (i.e. reducing VE values with no change in INT/BLM). We noticed that after the test drive, the Autoprom was quite warm since we have to locate it under the hood during test drives (93 ECM is underhood).
Does high temperature cause issues with the Autoprom? When not emulating, we are able to read ALDL data and we can read/write chips with no problem. Does anyone have any suggestions that we can try in an effort to get this working?
Even without the emulation, these products have enabled us to tune the car to a level better than it has ever been since in the current owner's possesion. I am greatly appreciative of all of the archived information on this site as it has greatly reduced our learning curve.
On some of our early test drives with emulation enabled, everything seemed normal early in the test drive, but after 2-3 miles it seemed that "online" changes were not affecting the performance of the engine (i.e. reducing VE values with no change in INT/BLM). We noticed that after the test drive, the Autoprom was quite warm since we have to locate it under the hood during test drives (93 ECM is underhood).
Does high temperature cause issues with the Autoprom? When not emulating, we are able to read ALDL data and we can read/write chips with no problem. Does anyone have any suggestions that we can try in an effort to get this working?
Even without the emulation, these products have enabled us to tune the car to a level better than it has ever been since in the current owner's possesion. I am greatly appreciative of all of the archived information on this site as it has greatly reduced our learning curve.
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
This is a bug in TunerPro (assuming that is what you're using). Try downloading a beta version here:
http://www.tunerpro.net/beta/Bailey/...ProRT_v400.exe
http://www.tunerpro.net/beta/Bailey/...ProRT_v400.exe
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are currently using TunerPro RT v4.13.
I mentioned this emulation + ALDL issue in another thread where some guys using the $58 mask were having similar problems. Mark replied that there is no issue with this on the 93 Z28 $DA3 mask. Here's a link to the other thread.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...-searched.html
The beta version is listed as v4.00. Do we need to "roll back" from v4.13 to this v4.00 beta software that I just downloaded from the link you provided? Sorry if I'm making this more complicated than it needs to be.
I mentioned this emulation + ALDL issue in another thread where some guys using the $58 mask were having similar problems. Mark replied that there is no issue with this on the 93 Z28 $DA3 mask. Here's a link to the other thread.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/diy-...-searched.html
The beta version is listed as v4.00. Do we need to "roll back" from v4.13 to this v4.00 beta software that I just downloaded from the link you provided? Sorry if I'm making this more complicated than it needs to be.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by GregC
On some of our early test drives with emulation enabled, everything seemed normal early in the test drive, but after 2-3 miles it seemed that "online" changes were not affecting the performance of the engine.
Originally Posted by GregC
Does high temperature cause issues with the Autoprom?
Originally Posted by GregC
Even without the emulation, these products have enabled us to tune the car to a level better than it has ever been since in the current owner's possesion. I am greatly appreciative of all of the archived information on this site as it has greatly reduced our learning curve.
#5
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally Posted by Craig Moates
This is a bug in TunerPro (assuming that is what you're using). Try downloading a beta version here:
http://www.tunerpro.net/beta/Bailey/...ProRT_v400.exe
http://www.tunerpro.net/beta/Bailey/...ProRT_v400.exe
Index of /beta/Builds
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Oops, sorry for that bad link.
On the emulation issue, it does sound like a software issue. One thing you can try is periodically re-upload the binary. This can get around software issues which fail to perform incremental updates. But if you're getting the audibles, then the updates should be occurring.
The AutoProm should be OK in the temperature ranges you're going. The NVRAM and micro are both industrial rated. Logic chips should also be OK. The plastic case will probably soften up before it gets hot ehough to be a problem. Might put some shielding in there if you're concerned. Watch out for rain though, it's NOT weatherproof!
On the emulation issue, it does sound like a software issue. One thing you can try is periodically re-upload the binary. This can get around software issues which fail to perform incremental updates. But if you're getting the audibles, then the updates should be occurring.
The AutoProm should be OK in the temperature ranges you're going. The NVRAM and micro are both industrial rated. Logic chips should also be OK. The plastic case will probably soften up before it gets hot ehough to be a problem. Might put some shielding in there if you're concerned. Watch out for rain though, it's NOT weatherproof!
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wrong link. Get the latest here:
The AutoProm should be OK in the temperature ranges you're going. The NVRAM and micro are both industrial rated. Logic chips should also be OK. The plastic case will probably soften up before it gets hot ehough to be a problem. Might put some shielding in there if you're concerned. Watch out for rain though, it's NOT weatherproof!
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by Craig Moates
Oops, sorry for that bad link.
On the emulation issue, it does sound like a software issue. One thing you can try is periodically re-upload the binary. This can get around software issues which fail to perform incremental updates. But if you're getting the audibles, then the updates should be occurring.
On the emulation issue, it does sound like a software issue. One thing you can try is periodically re-upload the binary. This can get around software issues which fail to perform incremental updates. But if you're getting the audibles, then the updates should be occurring.
Originally Posted by Craig Moates
Logic chips should also be OK. The plastic case will probably soften up before it gets hot ehough to be a problem.
#9
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally Posted by junkcltr
I was editing an ADS file using TP GUI and TP crashed. I went to open the ADS file but it came up blank. I opened up Explorer and the file size was 0 bytes. It wiped it out. Strange. Never had that happen before.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by Mangus
The crash occured after the file was opened (and wiped) and before any data was written to the file. You seem to find rather uncommon issues!
I still get failures from Acrobat "fonts sever failure". I get "no fonts" from MSYS when trying to run EMACS sometimes. TP crashes with the fatal execution error box all the time. They always seem like random crashes. The Win98 Start menu goes blank sometimes.
I have been thinking of throwing a copy of MS-Visual Studio C++ 4.0 on it so that it will run the debugger in info when it crashes. I could give you a stack trace in cases where it crashed. Would that help? It is stange, sometimes it will crash every three minutes when moving around between windows and sometimes it takes an hour. It does get to be a pain when it does it every 3-5 minutes (and will not retain the Monitor window items). Either way, it is definitely usable. It makes code & cal changes a lot easier to see with using the ALDL data for debugging.
EDIT: I really wish I didn't come across this weird stuff.
Last edited by junkcltr; 06-20-2006 at 06:13 PM.
#11
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Yeah, a call stack would be helpful, but based on what you're seeing, how often you're seeing it, and the symtoms (i.e. fonts, etc), I'm nearly certain there's something else going on related specifically to your system.
I still have the emails you sent some time ago, and as soon as I get back to TunerPro work (I'm currently working on the scanning side of things, to be released as ScannerPro and eventually integrated into what will be TunerPro v5), I'll investigate further.
I wish you weren't seeing such weird stuff too!
I still have the emails you sent some time ago, and as soon as I get back to TunerPro work (I'm currently working on the scanning side of things, to be released as ScannerPro and eventually integrated into what will be TunerPro v5), I'll investigate further.
I wish you weren't seeing such weird stuff too!
#12
I had a similar problem with 98 that went away when I got a new video card.
I had the emulation & no update problem with the previous to v4.13 also.
I upgraded in hopes of eliminating it....
Now that I think about it. I started using an xdf that had the different catagories about the same time. If that makes any diff.
I had the emulation & no update problem with the previous to v4.13 also.
I upgraded in hopes of eliminating it....
Now that I think about it. I started using an xdf that had the different catagories about the same time. If that makes any diff.
#13
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally Posted by Z69
I had a similar problem with 98 that went away when I got a new video card.
I had the emulation & no update problem with the previous to v4.13 also.
I upgraded in hopes of eliminating it....
Now that I think about it. I started using an xdf that had the different catagories about the same time. If that makes any diff.
I had the emulation & no update problem with the previous to v4.13 also.
I upgraded in hopes of eliminating it....
Now that I think about it. I started using an xdf that had the different catagories about the same time. If that makes any diff.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by Z69
I had a similar problem with 98 that went away when I got a new video card.
I had the emulation & no update problem with the previous to v4.13 also.
I upgraded in hopes of eliminating it....
Now that I think about it. I started using an xdf that had the different catagories about the same time. If that makes any diff.
I had the emulation & no update problem with the previous to v4.13 also.
I upgraded in hopes of eliminating it....
Now that I think about it. I started using an xdf that had the different catagories about the same time. If that makes any diff.
Strange about the XDF file difference. I had been working on the $58 stuff with a $58 XDF from NWSTP and a $58 ADS file from somewhere (don't remember) and I rarely got the font changed, but got the usual fatal error crashes.
I have been writing routines for the $8D code for the past few nights with the stock $8D ADS file and super_8d_2 XDF file. The font problem change happens quite a bit now followed by a crash.
I will load up VC++ 4.0 this weekend.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by Mangus
Yeah, a call stack would be helpful, but based on what you're seeing, how often you're seeing it, and the symtoms (i.e. fonts, etc), I'm nearly certain there's something else going on related specifically to your system.
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wrong link. Get the latest here:
Index of /beta/Builds
Index of /beta/Builds
On the emulation issue, it does sound like a software issue. One thing you can try is periodically re-upload the binary. This can get around software issues which fail to perform incremental updates. But if you're getting the audibles, then the updates should be occurring.
On incremental updates, is there a limit to the number of cells that can be changed at one time? The first time the problem happened, I was trying to change 6 cells in the VE table. After we re-uploaded the bin, I tried just changing 1 cell and had the same problem.
Even with this issue, the emulation is a big time saver. It means that we can stop the car, make changes, re-upload, and be back on the road without ever opening the hood to change chips!
Ha ha, darn S3 video card. It used to have fits with older versions of TP.
Gateway - 370 Notebook - MX3228
The AutoProm should be OK in the temperature ranges you're going. The NVRAM and micro are both industrial rated. Logic chips should also be OK. The plastic case will probably soften up before it gets hot ehough to be a problem. Might put some shielding in there if you're concerned. Watch out for rain though, it's NOT weatherproof!
Thanks to everyone for all the help.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: 441 SBC 12.5:1 0.680" Lift
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10 TruTrac Moser 9"
Did you disable checksums by uploading AA to 08? It's an option under the Tools/Preferences menu in TunerPro. I think it gets set back to 'unchecked' when you install a new version, so just a thought.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by GregC
Is there a problem with TunerPro and the S3 video adapter? Additional specs on the laptop are listed in the link below:
Good to hear you have it working. The SES coming on during emulation could be caused by many, many things. Start off by trying what Craig said to do.
Mark,
I went to the HP/Compaq site and saw that they have the "latest" year-2001 drivers for my machine there. I will give them a try this weekend (check what I have first) and see if it makes a difference.
#19
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
There is no limit to the number of cells you can update at once in a table. If the number of cells is over a certain number (I don't recall off the top of my head), the entire table is updated. This was because the Romulator didn't like to do scattered updates (the Ostrich & AutoProm have no problem with it).
I think Craig has the right suggestion here - make sure you've disabled the checksum by uploading 0xAA to the mask ID byte. That sounds like it's your issue.
Regarding the S3 issue - it's not likely to be the graphics card itself. It's usually a driver issue. When crashes happen, if the OS tells you that it's in some other module (not TunerPro), it's most likely an OS/driver issue.
I think Craig has the right suggestion here - make sure you've disabled the checksum by uploading 0xAA to the mask ID byte. That sounds like it's your issue.
Regarding the S3 issue - it's not likely to be the graphics card itself. It's usually a driver issue. When crashes happen, if the OS tells you that it's in some other module (not TunerPro), it's most likely an OS/driver issue.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Craig Moates
Did you disable checksums by uploading AA to 08? It's an option under the Tools/Preferences menu in TunerPro. I think it gets set back to 'unchecked' when you install a new version, so just a thought.
Originally Posted by Mangus
I think Craig has the right suggestion here - make sure you've disabled the checksum by uploading 0xAA to the mask ID byte. That sounds like it's your issue.
BTW Mark - I tried to copy the 2000 rpm row from the lower VE table and paste it into the 2000 rpm row in the upper VE table and could not get this to work. Is it only possible to copy & paste within the same table?
Now the fun really begins. We are really trying to dial in our VE tables since the camshaft has been changed by the previous owner (specs unknown). I am starting to see how some folks on this board have burned over a hundred chips trying to get the "perfect" tune. This LT1 exhibits the "Split BLM" trait even in the higher RPM ranges, so I haven't quite figured out how to attack that problem . I'll post tuning questions in another topic if I can't figure it out searching archived information.
I really appreciate the expert help and these really cool tuning tools. This stuff is quite addictive once you get a sniff of success!
#21
There's a little piece of code in the program that adds up all the code on the chip from point A to B. This total value is then checked against a stored value in the cal area on the prom. If they do not match, then you go into limp mode. When your emulating, they will never match after you do the first edit.
So if you put AA in, the checksum routine will not be done and the two values are never calc'd or compared as designed from GM.
This is to prevent a damaged bin from trying to operate the engine.
So if you put AA in, the checksum routine will not be done and the two values are never calc'd or compared as designed from GM.
This is to prevent a damaged bin from trying to operate the engine.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Originally Posted by Z69
When your emulating, they will never match after you do the first edit.
#23
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally Posted by junkcltr
True for TunerPro. False for TunerCat. I found this out while writing code for my emulator to work with both TP and TC. TC keeps track of the checksum at all times and stores it. TC plays with some other stuff on the emulator too.
TC actually uploads AA to the mask ID byte for you, and stores the original mask ID in emulation EEPROM. TC restores the mask ID byte before doing a complete download.
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: garage
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Engine: 3xx ci tubo
Transmission: 4L60E & 4L80E
Way off topic.......but is there a chance that TP could support MonteCarSlow's NVRAM module?
He has a TCL script that has modular functions and it is prerry straight forward in terms of protocol. Basically, ALDL data transfers.
EDIT: While I am off topic. Is there a way to chop up ALDL log files? I have a few that are long and want cut certain pieces out of. But the file is binary......so I couldn't figure out where a line started and ended.
He has a TCL script that has modular functions and it is prerry straight forward in terms of protocol. Basically, ALDL data transfers.
EDIT: While I am off topic. Is there a way to chop up ALDL log files? I have a few that are long and want cut certain pieces out of. But the file is binary......so I couldn't figure out where a line started and ended.
Last edited by junkcltr; 06-23-2006 at 12:21 AM.
#25
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Z69
There's a little piece of code in the program that adds up all the code on the chip from point A to B. This total value is then checked against a stored value in the cal area on the prom. If they do not match, then you go into limp mode.
#26
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
Originally Posted by GregC
If I understand this correctly, checking the "disable checksum" option in TP preferences (which loads the value AA into byte 08) only applies to emulation mode. The checksum value is still calculated and placed in memory when I burn my bin file onto a chip. Is this correct?
#27
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mark
I have noticed that with this beta version (v4.14), we have issues regarding copying & pasting values in the tables. When copying & pasting a from a compare bin to the current bin, the number of changed cells during the paste doesn't match the number of copied cells. In some cases, the copy & paste fails completly. Can you check this and report your results?
I have noticed that with this beta version (v4.14), we have issues regarding copying & pasting values in the tables. When copying & pasting a from a compare bin to the current bin, the number of changed cells during the paste doesn't match the number of copied cells. In some cases, the copy & paste fails completly. Can you check this and report your results?
#28
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
#29
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That fixed the problem - thanks for the update.
The Autoprom & TunerPro RT are great products. It blows me away knowing that you guys are just doing this stuff on the side in addition to your regular "day" jobs. Thanks for all the support.
The Autoprom & TunerPro RT are great products. It blows me away knowing that you guys are just doing this stuff on the side in addition to your regular "day" jobs. Thanks for all the support.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post