DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

BLM or INT vs WB02 A/F?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-10-2005 | 08:16 PM
  #1  
zipfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: PA
Car: 94 9c1 Caprice
Engine: LT1 (3-fity)
Transmission: 4L60E reBUILT
Axle/Gears: 3:08 POSI (out)
BLM or INT vs WB02 A/F?

For all the people that haven't got there WBo2's yet.
Has anyone made a chart that lists a/f raitos and blm's?
Old 07-10-2005 | 10:13 PM
  #2  
Low C1500's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Canada
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
Really good post....


https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=210850
Old 07-11-2005 | 09:04 AM
  #3  
zipfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: PA
Car: 94 9c1 Caprice
Engine: LT1 (3-fity)
Transmission: 4L60E reBUILT
Axle/Gears: 3:08 POSI (out)
missed that one (was in Iraq) and didn't spell it all out to find it in the search (learn something new all the time)
Old 07-11-2005 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Re: BLM or INT vs WB02 A/F?

Originally posted by zipfast
For all the people that haven't got there WBo2's yet.
Has anyone made a chart that lists a/f raitos and blm's?
BLMs is just the correction factor to adjust the average AFR to 14.7:1.

As far as WOT, I've in back to back runs, had an .820v O2 reading be, 12.5, and then 11.8. And I went back and forth with settings, and they were repeatible, ie the NB wasn't really worth much.

The NBs are just too sensitive, to Backpressure, and EGT, IMO, to be realiable. While some have gotten them to work OK, on their car, IMO, that's vastly different then saying 830mv is safe for everyone.
Old 07-11-2005 | 03:26 PM
  #5  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 3
From: wisconsin
POI. pre WB i worked on BLMS to get them in line. datalogged for about 20 logs and burned chips. this was 1st set up in sig. FP was 13. set A/F to 12.0 for PE. went to dyno and with their WB on 2 consecutive runs ran 12.3/1 and 11.9/1. point is i "guess" PE falls into line if the underlying fuel tables are OK. i expected to be lean but was not. a mild cam kept me out of trouble(ignorant bliss).
Old 07-12-2005 | 10:15 PM
  #6  
zipfast's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 1
From: PA
Car: 94 9c1 Caprice
Engine: LT1 (3-fity)
Transmission: 4L60E reBUILT
Axle/Gears: 3:08 POSI (out)
Thanks for the replies what I need / wanted to know was that after say .900 mv is extra fuel which would act like a choke being stuck on. A boggggggggg and the fact that it's wasting fuel.
Old 07-13-2005 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,879
Likes: 3
From: wisconsin
i would expect without a WB one would look at plug readings or G Tech data. with WB possibly all three. i have commanded currently 12.5/1 and am satisfied with that. no GTECH(yet) no plug reads(yet). i have no place to run WOT for more than 5 secs at a time for fear or fear itself. last run was 13.3/1 at 5 sec of WOT to 105 mph, commanded to 12.5, so upped FP from 13 to 20 and result was idle issues. so back to 17 FP and will run WOT and see if i can get under 13/1 PE/WOT. eventually GTech and see if running richer(12.25/1) will help. no magic A/F from what i hear.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
05-24-2018 02:02 PM
antman89iroc
DIY PROM
36
01-31-2016 09:42 AM
skinny z
Carburetors
11
09-30-2015 12:25 AM
WhteRbt
Tech / General Engine
2
09-21-2015 10:48 AM
buckshot63
Camaros for Sale
0
09-10-2015 10:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.