MAF gram/sec @ idle and scalar question
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cartahge, MO
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
MAF gram/sec @ idle and scalar question
After an hour of searching I will give up and ask. I have a 383 running 6e and the MAF is reading 13-14 grams per second at idle. Stock calibration calls for 4-8 grams per second at idle. Is mine reading more because of the bigger engine or do I have a problem here and they should be reading 4-8?
I got a little off track when searching and saw a post regarding MAF scalars. Everything I read said the last cell in table one should match the first in table two. I am using Tuner Pro 4.0 and in Table 1 last entry is 22.36 and in Table 2 first entry is 21.38. Should I change them to match?
I got a little off track when searching and saw a post regarding MAF scalars. Everything I read said the last cell in table one should match the first in table two. I am using Tuner Pro 4.0 and in Table 1 last entry is 22.36 and in Table 2 first entry is 21.38. Should I change them to match?
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
4 is very low, 8 is more typical, but I dont see anything too terribly wrong with around 13 g/s, especially if the motor is set up to have a fast idle. How does the exhaust smell?
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cartahge, MO
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
dimented24x7 - The exhaust smells rich at idle. I am commanding idle at 750 rpm so maybe that is the reason for the added air flow. I will set the table back to stock and see if the grams/sec comes down. It makes since. Thanks
88305tpiT/A - I will change them, I apprecaite it. Have any idea why they did not match in the first place? Confusing...
88305tpiT/A - I will change them, I apprecaite it. Have any idea why they did not match in the first place? Confusing...
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cartahge, MO
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 383 Stroker
Transmission: 700R4
I am using xdf off of TunerPro's website. I downloaded it around 3 to 4 weeks ago when I went to 4.0. I originally read the stock chip with TunerPro 3.10 and the ecu file off the website as well. Why, are there some know problems that have been fixed?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post