DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

ANHT Data difference

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2004, 07:38 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
ANHT Data difference

Looking at the ANHT hac at the table at L834B.
The header indicates 12 values as does all of the other tables of data for the TCC control points.
This table has 13 points!
I am comparing to the AUJP I disassembled for commenting and I have an "extra" $FF at the end of the table that is shifting my line numbers. My data is lining up after that point in patterns that seem to match up but like I said, they are 1 line off now.
The ANHT has 2 points entered in the table for the 44 MPH or 2000 RPM point, but they do have different %load values.
56 and 82.

What gives?
How could lookup be done on two lines with the same values?
Old 11-23-2004, 07:43 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
;--------------------------------------------------
; LOAD LIMIT vs MPH or RPM, 12 lines
; (HI GEARS LOWER THRESHOLD)
;
; TCC LOCK/UN-LOCK vs MPH or RPM
; 700R4
;
; TBL = %FULL LD * 2.56
;--------------------------------------------------
; % LD MPH RPM
;------------------------
L834B: FCB 36 ; 14 12 400
FCB 36 ; 14 20 800
FCB 36 ; 14 28 1200
FCB 36 ; 14 36 1600
FCB 56 ; 22 44 2000 <--------
FCB 82 ; 32 44 2000 <-------- here
FCB 102 ; 40 52 2400
FCB 113 ; 44 60 2800
FCB 123 ; 48 68 3200
FCB 123 ; 48 76 3600
FCB 123 ; 48 84 4000
FCB 123 ; 48 92 4400
FCB 120 ; 47 100 4800
;--------------------------------------------------

I'll not make you look it up.

Last edited by JP86SS; 11-23-2004 at 07:45 PM.
Old 11-24-2004, 06:40 AM
  #3  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
RBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes on 211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
It is an error in the hac. The TCC tables are 12 lines each. One thing you can do is to count up the addresses until the next listed address. There are a couple of others like that too.

RBob.
Old 11-24-2004, 11:12 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
JP86SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Browns Town
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Monte SS (730,$8D,G3,AP,4K,S_V4)
Engine: 406 Hyd Roller 236/242
Transmission: 700R4 HomeBrew, 2.4K stall
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Posi, 7.5 Soon to break
I've noticed alot of line number errors and such in there, the issue is that I DO have a 13th position value.
The items after that section seem to line up but I haven't nailed down if the data references in my disassembly point to the correct usage locations. That is next on the list.
I'm getting almost wrapped up with fully commenting the calibration section but this one has me worried.
I'm going to add the duplicate point to my table and continue. I'll find out if the address shift is causing other issues as I get into the meat of the code.
If anyone else has been through this and can shed some light, the help would probably save a few more hours or days to completion.
I'll post the full hac on Craig's site when done. I haven't seen a full AUJP anywhere so it would be good for everyone to have as a ref. (hopefully with no errors)
I'm leaving the values in hex so it can be followed by anyones disassembly and making decimal references to the table values.
Makes it much easier to read that way when looking your own code.
I'll put up the calibration section first then continue with the rest so if anyone else is doing it they can have a better reference to $8D. I included the "missing" table F2A.src as well. The ANHT hac does have alot of errors in there, but it is understandable. There is alot in there to deal with.
Jp
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
69GTOby
Tech / General Engine
40
04-18-2016 02:34 PM
Numbah-1
Transmissions and Drivetrain
19
09-12-2015 08:57 PM
J.C. Denton
Body
0
09-08-2015 05:35 PM
Amillionoh7
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
6
09-05-2015 11:44 PM
greenyone
TPI
3
09-02-2015 03:39 PM



Quick Reply: ANHT Data difference



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.