Oxygen sensor threshold rich/lean table in 6e maf code
11-22-2004, 03:12 PM
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ft Worth, TX USA
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2016 Ram 1500
Engine: 3.0L Diesel
Transmission: 8sp
Oxygen sensor threshold rich/lean table in 6e maf code
I noticed that this table calls out the cross cound point for stoichiometric as a function of airflow. why would you need such a thing?
I would guess that if the engine were providing the o2 sensor with highly variant f/a ratios then the o2 sensor might have a lag going from one extreme to the other and compensation would be in order.
And I thought that all those threads bashing NB o2 sensors for only knowing 14.7 were saying that there is only one Mv rating the computer could use to find it. All other voltages were unrelatable to a specific f/a ratio.
Seems like one might be able to raise this number for lower airflows to raise the f/a ratio -- but then we get into the whole mess of where the sensor is accurate.
Anybody have ideas?
I would guess that if the engine were providing the o2 sensor with highly variant f/a ratios then the o2 sensor might have a lag going from one extreme to the other and compensation would be in order.
And I thought that all those threads bashing NB o2 sensors for only knowing 14.7 were saying that there is only one Mv rating the computer could use to find it. All other voltages were unrelatable to a specific f/a ratio.
Seems like one might be able to raise this number for lower airflows to raise the f/a ratio -- but then we get into the whole mess of where the sensor is accurate.
Anybody have ideas?
11-23-2004, 09:06 AM
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Like said above thats a valid way to do it. Set teh (or a) bias added into the stoich O2 voltage to get it to idle the way you want and then change the MAF tables around where the car idles to try and get the BLMs in line. Although I dont think the MAF cars have such a thing, do they?
11-23-2004, 10:49 AM
#4
11-23-2004, 11:30 AM
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Change it and see how it works out.
Adding a touch more fuel at low flows will probably help improve the idle.
Adding a touch more fuel at low flows will probably help improve the idle.
11-23-2004, 08:16 PM
#6
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.1L Gen III
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Originally posted by dimented24x7
Change it and see how it works out. Adding a touch more fuel at low flows will probably help improve the idle.
Change it and see how it works out.
Adding a touch more fuel at low flows will probably help improve the idle. 
11-23-2004, 09:10 PM
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Its different for every motor. The cam probably screws with the O2, anyway. With my stock motor the richer idle seemed to help smooth it a bit.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
