DIY PROM Do It Yourself PROM chip burning help. No PROM begging. No PROMs for sale. No commercial exchange. Not a referral service.

MAF's frequency not voltage... why

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2004 | 10:39 PM
  #1  
JPrevost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
MAF's frequency not voltage... why

I think it's because a voltage output would be sensitive to wire resistance, voltage drop, and steady supply. A TPS and MAP sensor really aren't THAT important, they just need to be pretty close. A MAF on the other hand has to measure correct airflow to control the fuel precisely.
Here's the twist, why couldn't the MAF have a 0-5v output with a dedicated regulated power supply like the TPS and MAP?
Or did GM do it because it's rare that they ever get to use the built in timers with one of the gazzilion digital inputs?
Maybe all of the above.
Anybody else have any ideas without cheating and asking GM .
Old 10-06-2004 | 10:52 PM
  #2  
JP84Z430HP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
From: Johnstown, Ohio
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
To further the question, why does that "Other" manfacturer (Ford) just use a 0-5 volt signal for the MAF? Must mean that the digital is not a requirement of the MAF, but just the way GM cared to implement it? Interesting question indeed...
Old 10-07-2004 | 01:48 AM
  #3  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 3
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
As you probably already know, the tps and MAP need the constant voltage since theyre position sensors. In the tps, there is basically a resister thats hooked between ground and constant +5 volts and a contact along the resister that moves with the throttle. The output is hooked to the contact and as it moves along the resister it provides a linear 0-5 volt output. Without a dedicated, regulated power supply, the voltage would vary and screw up the readings.

The maf has a bunch of circuitry junk in it so it can generate whatever outputs wanted so battery voltage is probably fine. As for why frequency or voltage, I donno...

Last edited by dimented24x7; 10-07-2004 at 01:50 AM.
Old 10-07-2004 | 10:09 AM
  #4  
RBob's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 227
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: MAF's frequency not voltage... why

Originally posted by JPrevost
I think it's because a voltage output would be sensitive to wire resistance, voltage drop, and steady supply. A TPS and MAP sensor really aren't THAT important, they just need to be pretty close. A MAF on the other hand has to measure correct airflow to control the fuel precisely.
Here's the twist, why couldn't the MAF have a 0-5v output with a dedicated regulated power supply like the TPS and MAP?
Or did GM do it because it's rare that they ever get to use the built in timers with one of the gazzilion digital inputs?
Maybe all of the above.
Anybody else have any ideas without cheating and asking GM .
Greater dynamic range and less susceptible to noise.

RBob.
Old 10-07-2004 | 01:14 PM
  #5  
JPrevost's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Re: Re: MAF's frequency not voltage... why

Originally posted by RBob
Greater dynamic range and less susceptible to noise.

RBob.
Noise, that was what I was trying to say, lol.
The dynamic range is interesting. I did some math and the range for a 0-5v with an ~4v range; 8-bit ~ 0.015625v and 16-bit ~ 0.000061v . What are the timers built into the processor? Isn't there a 160, an 100, and 80hz in the c3's? I could find out but I'm too lazy right now.
I have a feeling that GM uses the frequency and 16-bit to decrease the latency fuel correction effects. Example; with an 8-bit it might take ___ms before the ecm knows that the air flow is decreasing while it would take less time for a 16-bit MAF to react.
I know this is pretty random but I haven't learned anything new in the past few days.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
05-24-2018 02:02 PM
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
02-26-2016 03:57 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
10-03-2015 04:46 PM
Ikes 91Z
LSX and LTX Parts
0
09-13-2015 10:03 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.