'7747 Commanded AFR vs BPW vs VE's
08-16-2004, 05:57 PM
#1
TGO Supporter
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'7747 Commanded AFR vs BPW vs VE's
Guys,
I would like to bring my commanded PE AFR into line with what the WBO2 is showing. Currently the PE AFR tables are at 11:1 to give 12.8:1 at the WBO2.
Are the VE's independant of the commanded AFR calcs? ie., Can I adjust the BPW constant to bring the actual AFR closer to commanded AFR without having to remap the VE's??
TIA,
Ben.
I would like to bring my commanded PE AFR into line with what the WBO2 is showing. Currently the PE AFR tables are at 11:1 to give 12.8:1 at the WBO2.
Are the VE's independant of the commanded AFR calcs? ie., Can I adjust the BPW constant to bring the actual AFR closer to commanded AFR without having to remap the VE's??
TIA,
Ben.
08-16-2004, 07:59 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Red Deer, Canada
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
The fuel calc for PE is based off your VE tables, which are based off bpw,
I would add fuel to your VE table in the high rpm/ high map areas to make your PE afr match your WB
I would add fuel to your VE table in the high rpm/ high map areas to make your PE afr match your WB
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
5
09-28-2015 05:50 PM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
09-13-2015 11:35 PM
