Our Latest & Greatest... The SpeedReader.
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Corvette
Engine: 350 CrossFire
Transmission: 700R4
Our Latest & Greatest... The SpeedReader.
This weekend we revealed our latest project at Grumpy's EFI Pow-Wow; mind you this is primarily for TBI C3 ECM's.
Bill and I came up with a *replacement* daughterboard for the TBI C3 ECM's (ala 1227747, 1228746, 1228063 I think?) that not only has built-in Lockers functionality, but also allows you to convert the ECM to a "ROMless" version.
What this does for you is allow you to read in data at a rate that FAR exceeds not only the stock 160 baud ALDL rate, but also the 8192 rate of P4 ECM's! It allows you to read EVERY single piece of RAM, and we're also going to incorporate a 4-channel 10-bit A/D so you can read in data like a Wideband or EGT or extra temp sensors. We will be working with Jon Prevost and possibly Mark Mansur (Mark?) for software support. We'll just be making the hardware. The Speedreader will have SERIAL and PARALLEL interface, so it will hopefully easily integrate with your current laptop. If you have a Prominator, it will daisy-chain to it, for a single-cable solution.
The "ROMless" conversion allows you to disable the on-board ROM that contains the program code (that is otherwise unalterable) and make changes (provided you have a patch, or know how to write/re-write assembly code for GM ECM's.) It allows you to put the code on the same chip that the calibration code is on (although obviously, much bigger - 16k vs. 4k.) I will also tell you that we talked to BobR about "ultimate TBI code" that will have quite a few features, but we haven't hashed anything out just yet. We'll provide more details as they come. This however, is optional if you want to continue using the stock (1227747, 1228746, etc.) code. The SpeedReader will be setup so you can use EPROM's, EEPROM's, AutoProm, Romulator, or of course, our Prominator. That way if you already have a device for making changes, you can use it with the SpeedReader.
So, for those of you with 1227747, 1228746, etc. - we'll finally have all the advantages of a P4 that runs a TBI setup smoothly. We're really in the design stage, and want some feedback from everyone before we set everything in stone.
We're looking to keep the cost of this under $100, as well, so it's not too far out of reach for anyone.
Here's a sneak peek at the prototype;
Bill and I came up with a *replacement* daughterboard for the TBI C3 ECM's (ala 1227747, 1228746, 1228063 I think?) that not only has built-in Lockers functionality, but also allows you to convert the ECM to a "ROMless" version.
What this does for you is allow you to read in data at a rate that FAR exceeds not only the stock 160 baud ALDL rate, but also the 8192 rate of P4 ECM's! It allows you to read EVERY single piece of RAM, and we're also going to incorporate a 4-channel 10-bit A/D so you can read in data like a Wideband or EGT or extra temp sensors. We will be working with Jon Prevost and possibly Mark Mansur (Mark?) for software support. We'll just be making the hardware. The Speedreader will have SERIAL and PARALLEL interface, so it will hopefully easily integrate with your current laptop. If you have a Prominator, it will daisy-chain to it, for a single-cable solution.
The "ROMless" conversion allows you to disable the on-board ROM that contains the program code (that is otherwise unalterable) and make changes (provided you have a patch, or know how to write/re-write assembly code for GM ECM's.) It allows you to put the code on the same chip that the calibration code is on (although obviously, much bigger - 16k vs. 4k.) I will also tell you that we talked to BobR about "ultimate TBI code" that will have quite a few features, but we haven't hashed anything out just yet. We'll provide more details as they come. This however, is optional if you want to continue using the stock (1227747, 1228746, etc.) code. The SpeedReader will be setup so you can use EPROM's, EEPROM's, AutoProm, Romulator, or of course, our Prominator. That way if you already have a device for making changes, you can use it with the SpeedReader.
So, for those of you with 1227747, 1228746, etc. - we'll finally have all the advantages of a P4 that runs a TBI setup smoothly. We're really in the design stage, and want some feedback from everyone before we set everything in stone.
We're looking to keep the cost of this under $100, as well, so it's not too far out of reach for anyone.
Here's a sneak peek at the prototype;
#3
Thought about making it USB? (not just encapsulated serial, but a true USB peripheral) That'd be way cool!
When do you anticipate having this? Need to see if I should delay getting my car running
When do you anticipate having this? Need to see if I should delay getting my car running
#4
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dyersburg, TN
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Chevy 454SS
Engine: 454
Transmission: TH400
Another tester..
Very interested in this also. I am running a 1228747 TBI application, and the stock data rate is killing me.
Sounds Good.
Sounds Good.
#5
Supreme Member
This is pretty incredible, guys. Keep up the great work. Like the previous poster, any eta?
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
I would of course be interested in this.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
WTF? Every time I do something I always have to ghetto rig it together and make my own stuff to get it to work, and then a little while later the parts I origionally needed start to come out. Its like going to the moon, and having the russians already there when you arrive. I guess I cant complain too much since the romless conversion and my add on 1280 bps serial communications where pretty much free mods.
Nice work guys! Really be interested in using one of these. On board serial and A/D converters would be really cool add ons. The idea of the 'ultimate tbi' code sounds awsome as well!
Nice work guys! Really be interested in using one of these. On board serial and A/D converters would be really cool add ons. The idea of the 'ultimate tbi' code sounds awsome as well!
#10
Supreme Member
btw, if you need/want to test it on a moded tbi Im in Dayton, also. Obviously I'd buy the part, supply a wb o2, laptop and offer my car as a test bed.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by MrDude_1
of course, its my luck that this comes out AFTER i switch to a 730/$58 setup
of course, its my luck that this comes out AFTER i switch to a 730/$58 setup
In a 730?.
#12
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: In your ear. No, the other one.
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '89 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T5WC
Axle/Gears: 3.08 posi
I'm always interested in hearing software interfacing details. I'm not fond of parallel port interfacing (read: I'm an anti-fan of parallel ports).
Since I'll already be tackling Prominator support, I don't see a reason why I can't take a look at this too.
Parallel AND serial scares me a little. Does this mean I need to support either/or? That doesn't make it easy on the poor software developer.
Will it come with a TunerPro license?!! ;-)
Since I'll already be tackling Prominator support, I don't see a reason why I can't take a look at this too.
Parallel AND serial scares me a little. Does this mean I need to support either/or? That doesn't make it easy on the poor software developer.
Will it come with a TunerPro license?!! ;-)
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
So the Locker's type data will be taken right from your speedreader, not the card edge connector?
Sweet! Maybe I'll hang on to the C3 in my S-10 for a bit longer then! (And change it to a 747, or 8063, something that has been around the block!)
Sweet! Maybe I'll hang on to the C3 in my S-10 for a bit longer then! (And change it to a 747, or 8063, something that has been around the block!)
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I would be very interested in this as well! Sounds like exactly what I've been looking for, since I don't really have the means to build the lockers setup, much like many other members I'm sure.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by Dave_Jones
Any reason it couldn't be made to work with the 1227148?
Any reason it couldn't be made to work with the 1227148?
Thou, the ROMless concept is full adaptable.
But, it's ALOT of work.
IMO, the 148 is just as easily replaced with a 749. And with the cource code avaible for the 749, that option works best for me.
I'd be looking for another update for the 60 code shortly.
#18
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Originally posted by Grumpy
IMO, the 148 is just as easily replaced with a 749. And with the cource code avaible for the 749, that option works best for me.
I'd be looking for another update for the 60 code shortly.
IMO, the 148 is just as easily replaced with a 749. And with the cource code avaible for the 749, that option works best for me.
I'd be looking for another update for the 60 code shortly.
I was mostly wondering how the 148 compared to the TBI C3s.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by Dave_Jones
I was mostly wondering how the 148 compared to the TBI C3s.
I was mostly wondering how the 148 compared to the TBI C3s.
The boards look completely different.
#21
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 T/A
Engine: 350/LT1 Intake
Transmission: 700R4 - Built
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
Wait.. you are based in Houston and never came to our gatherings?..
shame shame
shame shame
#22
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thought about making it USB? (not just encapsulated serial, but a true USB peripheral) That'd be way cool!
When do you anticipate having this?
WTF? Every time I do something I always have to ghetto rig it together and make my own stuff to get it to work, and then a little while later the parts I origionally needed start to come out.
I'm always interested in hearing software interfacing details. I'm not fond of parallel port interfacing (read: I'm an anti-fan of parallel ports).
So the Locker's type data will be taken right from your speedreader, not the card edge connector?
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Corvette
Engine: 350 CrossFire
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Sonar_un
Wait.. you are based in Houston and never came to our gatherings?..
shame shame
Wait.. you are based in Houston and never came to our gatherings?..
shame shame
As far as the '7148 goes, it's probably easier (and much better) to upgrade to a '7749 as Grumpy suggests - however we will look into it. Can anyone supply me with some schematics and/or pictures of a '7148?
Our primary intentions were to gain the advantages of a P4 on TBI systems. Does anyone know what other ECM's used a similar daughtercard to the '7747/'8746/'8063?
#24
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Originally posted by Ken73
As far as the '7148 goes, it's probably easier (and much better) to upgrade to a '7749 as Grumpy suggests - however we will look into it. Can anyone supply me with some schematics and/or pictures of a '7148?
As far as the '7148 goes, it's probably easier (and much better) to upgrade to a '7749 as Grumpy suggests - however we will look into it. Can anyone supply me with some schematics and/or pictures of a '7148?
Personally, I've already decided to go the '749 route, but there might be a market to the TTA & Buick Turbo Regal crowd. They already have DirectScan for high speed datalogging, but since that costs $250, I'd imagine they'd appreciate having another option.
#25
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 Corvette
Engine: 350 CrossFire
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Dave_Jones
Well, I can easily snap some pictures of a 148 later today. Matter of fact, if you decide you're interested in pursuing it, I can loan you a spare ECM.
Personally, I've already decided to go the '749 route, but there might be a market to the TTA & Buick Turbo Regal crowd. They already have DirectScan for high speed datalogging, but since that costs $250, I'd imagine they'd appreciate having another option.
Well, I can easily snap some pictures of a 148 later today. Matter of fact, if you decide you're interested in pursuing it, I can loan you a spare ECM.
Personally, I've already decided to go the '749 route, but there might be a market to the TTA & Buick Turbo Regal crowd. They already have DirectScan for high speed datalogging, but since that costs $250, I'd imagine they'd appreciate having another option.
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 83 Crossfire Z28; 82 Crossfire Corvette; 68 455 Firebird
Good stuff!
I know i've been useless lately, but at some point I'll get back to the tuning and am always willing to help on the testing / software side.
Let me know if I can help with this effort.
Ian
I know i've been useless lately, but at some point I'll get back to the tuning and am always willing to help on the testing / software side.
Let me know if I can help with this effort.
Ian
#27
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ft. Leavenworth, KS
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 83 TA, 89 TTA, others
Engine: ZZ4 TPI, LC2 turbo v6
Transmission: several, mostly broken
Originally posted by Ken73
Interesting; I see where Kent Chu (DirectScan) also lives in Houston. It looks to me like he has a commercialized version of Lockers just for the '7148 if I'm not mistaken. If we did a device, we'd do a full ROMless conversion as well as a Lockers instance on the same device, and probably put extra A/D on it for WBo2/EGT capabilities.
Interesting; I see where Kent Chu (DirectScan) also lives in Houston. It looks to me like he has a commercialized version of Lockers just for the '7148 if I'm not mistaken. If we did a device, we'd do a full ROMless conversion as well as a Lockers instance on the same device, and probably put extra A/D on it for WBo2/EGT capabilities.
How hard is it to add additional A/D inputs? Two would be awesome, and three would be perfect. (WB, EGT, and MAP -- on a stock TTA/TR, the ECM doesn't see the MAP; there is a MAP sensor, but it's only for the boost gauge)
DirectScan has been around for a long time, I don't think it was copied from Lockers...but it does work along the same lines.
If you want a '148 to examine, just ask. I already have your address.
Last edited by Dave_Jones; 06-08-2004 at 04:39 PM.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by MrBill
Exactly.
Exactly.
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by Dave_Jones
How hard is it to add additional A/D inputs? Two would be awesome, and three would be perfect. (WB, EGT, and MAP -- on a stock TTA/TR, the ECM doesn't see the MAP; there is a MAP sensor, but it's only for the boost gauge)
How hard is it to add additional A/D inputs? Two would be awesome, and three would be perfect. (WB, EGT, and MAP -- on a stock TTA/TR, the ECM doesn't see the MAP; there is a MAP sensor, but it's only for the boost gauge)
The P4 on the other hand have alot of unused inputs, that just aren't connected. As well as a few outputs.
Yes, the mind she boggles.
Traction Control, Anti-lag, true VE calculated fuel, MAP/MAF blending, wastegate, BOV, it's all doable.
Not to mention closed loop NB, and closed loop WOT with a WB.
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Originally posted by Ken73
Our primary intentions were to gain the advantages of a P4 on TBI systems. Does anyone know what other ECM's used a similar daughtercard to the '7747/'8746/'8063?
Our primary intentions were to gain the advantages of a P4 on TBI systems. Does anyone know what other ECM's used a similar daughtercard to the '7747/'8746/'8063?
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Definatly cool stuff!
As for the serial input, that would be easiest. USB hardware I'm sure isn't "easy" but LabView can do it all .
I can also do the parallel, just let me know.
The extra AD channels synced is high priority with the wideband and lack of inputs on the TBI c3's.
Having the Romless and ultimate TBI code is another HUGE step in the right direction. No more of this VE1 2D array plus VE2 adder 1D array BS. Finally some room to remove worthless code, insert better code, and increase table resolution!!! Like Ken said, it's p4 and MORE for the c3 .
As for the serial input, that would be easiest. USB hardware I'm sure isn't "easy" but LabView can do it all .
I can also do the parallel, just let me know.
The extra AD channels synced is high priority with the wideband and lack of inputs on the TBI c3's.
Having the Romless and ultimate TBI code is another HUGE step in the right direction. No more of this VE1 2D array plus VE2 adder 1D array BS. Finally some room to remove worthless code, insert better code, and increase table resolution!!! Like Ken said, it's p4 and MORE for the c3 .
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Yeah, having the extra memory available to get rid of the VE adder BS and increase the size of the SA table are difinate pluses. Wasnt at all sad to see that stupid VE adder table go. Same thing with all that stupid emmisions stuff. Ehh, as for passing emmisions, who cares... Jsut as long as I can have my cool features.
#35
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Originally posted by JP84Z430HP
Looks like the 16144288, and the 1228062 that I have are pretty close to the same, although I have to question the demand for either! The wiring for both is pretty much the same as a '7747, I have verified that they will swap. The IAC may be different on the '8062, and I don't know about the A/C input, or output being the same....
Looks like the 16144288, and the 1228062 that I have are pretty close to the same, although I have to question the demand for either! The wiring for both is pretty much the same as a '7747, I have verified that they will swap. The IAC may be different on the '8062, and I don't know about the A/C input, or output being the same....
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In reality
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
Originally posted by dimented24x7
Yeah, having the extra memory available to get rid of the VE adder BS and increase the size of the SA table are difinate pluses. Wasnt at all sad to see that stupid VE adder table go. Same thing with all that stupid emmisions stuff. Ehh, as for passing emmisions, who cares... Jsut as long as I can have my cool features.
Yeah, having the extra memory available to get rid of the VE adder BS and increase the size of the SA table are difinate pluses. Wasnt at all sad to see that stupid VE adder table go. Same thing with all that stupid emmisions stuff. Ehh, as for passing emmisions, who cares... Jsut as long as I can have my cool features.
Oddly enough there was just a post about the latest Gen VII having added a PE mode.
But, ya, they do seem to run better with less code, in the one low code set-up I've run.
#38
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moorestown, NJ
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by Grumpy
Ya know thou, it does work out pretty good, the VE adder. There's some stuff that's rather amazing at how well it really does work.
Oddly enough there was just a post about the latest Gen VII having added a PE mode.
But, ya, they do seem to run better with less code, in the one low code set-up I've run.
Ya know thou, it does work out pretty good, the VE adder. There's some stuff that's rather amazing at how well it really does work.
Oddly enough there was just a post about the latest Gen VII having added a PE mode.
But, ya, they do seem to run better with less code, in the one low code set-up I've run.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockport, TX
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1980 Jeep CJ7
Engine: AMC 360 with GM TBI
Transmission: TF727 set for kill...let's get it on!!!
Very interesting. I'll throw another "offer" in for testing on the 8746.
#40
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Ok I'm tired of waiting already. Is there any way I can get my hands on this some time in the next week or two? I'll even pay double of whatever your asking!!!! But seriously guys you need to do this and soon, you'll more than make enough money to make it worth your time. I have a 747 and a 746 if you need some else for a guiney pig. BMmonteSS @aol.com
#41
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Along with having a high speed data logging capability, the SpeedReader is also capable of being ROMLess.
Is there any interest in being able to run enhanced software in the ECM? This would include items such as dual VE tables: a high resolution low speed table and a medium resolution high speed table. Same for the SA., a low speed table and an extended table.
Other supprted functionality includes VATS, electric fan, shift light, two stage rev-limiter, valet mode, A/C control, IAC startup postion (prevents flare on startup), PE SA based on transmission gear (manual trans only), idle control via SA, idle SA setting, AE vs. RPM, extended delta TPS AE table, IAT/CTS blend for fueling, transient open loop modes, lean cruise, N-Alpha mode, and a host of other goodies. Note that there is no EGR or CCP in this code. It does support both a stick tranny and an auto with a TCC.
This is the code that I have been running for several years now. I added whatever it took to get a TBI setup to run well, very well.
I am currently using this code on two vehicles, a hot 327 and a stock LG4. It works with both. Different cals, same code. The code is setup so that functionality can be enabled or disabled via option bytes. This allows it to be used on different vehicles. Options can be changed dependent upon the vehicle/engine combination.
Tuning goodies will include a VE table tuning process and an ECU file. If there is enough interest this bin can be included with each SpeedReader.
Any interest?
RBob.
Is there any interest in being able to run enhanced software in the ECM? This would include items such as dual VE tables: a high resolution low speed table and a medium resolution high speed table. Same for the SA., a low speed table and an extended table.
Other supprted functionality includes VATS, electric fan, shift light, two stage rev-limiter, valet mode, A/C control, IAC startup postion (prevents flare on startup), PE SA based on transmission gear (manual trans only), idle control via SA, idle SA setting, AE vs. RPM, extended delta TPS AE table, IAT/CTS blend for fueling, transient open loop modes, lean cruise, N-Alpha mode, and a host of other goodies. Note that there is no EGR or CCP in this code. It does support both a stick tranny and an auto with a TCC.
This is the code that I have been running for several years now. I added whatever it took to get a TBI setup to run well, very well.
I am currently using this code on two vehicles, a hot 327 and a stock LG4. It works with both. Different cals, same code. The code is setup so that functionality can be enabled or disabled via option bytes. This allows it to be used on different vehicles. Options can be changed dependent upon the vehicle/engine combination.
Tuning goodies will include a VE table tuning process and an ECU file. If there is enough interest this bin can be included with each SpeedReader.
Any interest?
RBob.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Red Deer, Canada
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
RBOB, I'm drulling at the thought of having improved code. I hate the EGR crap, and the IAC controls that seem to have a mind of there own. Your running the 747 right?. You guys have the smarts to make these old C3 ecms almost unbeatable.
#43
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Originally posted by RBob
Any interest?
Any interest?
What mask is it based on? It sounds like it's pretty much the "Perfect" C3 code! There are several items you listed that I want or need. The A/C control is a must (my truck has it stock, but not all masks do, and I'm not sure what code I'll end up running, and I don't want to re-wire the A/C), IAC startup (Might improve my long crank times), and I'm sure the better tables will make tuning better....
I would be willing to donate a few $$$ your way for the use of the bin! I know you've put lot's of time and effort into it! (Read as: I'm willing to pay for my laziness!)
#44
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Not only do we get the perfect piece of hardware, we get the perfect software to take full advantage of it.
:hail: :lala: :hail: :lala: :hail: :lala: :hail: :lala:
:hail: :lala: :hail: :lala: :hail: :lala: :hail: :lala:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
You guys have no idea how good you've got it! I've known Bob for a while now and haven't had the nerve to ask him if I could use/try his code on my car... and now he's offering it up in package!
RBob, you should have signed up to TGO with "DA MAN" as your user name.
RBob, you should have signed up to TGO with "DA MAN" as your user name.
#46
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Originally posted by RBob
Along with having a high speed data logging capability, the SpeedReader is also capable of being ROMLess.
Is there any interest in being able to run enhanced software in the ECM? This would include items such as dual VE tables: a high resolution low speed table and a medium resolution high speed table. Same for the SA., a low speed table and an extended table.
Other supprted functionality includes VATS, electric fan, shift light, two stage rev-limiter, valet mode, A/C control, IAC startup postion (prevents flare on startup), PE SA based on transmission gear (manual trans only), idle control via SA, idle SA setting, AE vs. RPM, extended delta TPS AE table, IAT/CTS blend for fueling, transient open loop modes, lean cruise, N-Alpha mode, and a host of other goodies. Note that there is no EGR or CCP in this code. It does support both a stick tranny and an auto with a TCC.
This is the code that I have been running for several years now. I added whatever it took to get a TBI setup to run well, very well.
I am currently using this code on two vehicles, a hot 327 and a stock LG4. It works with both. Different cals, same code. The code is setup so that functionality can be enabled or disabled via option bytes. This allows it to be used on different vehicles. Options can be changed dependent upon the vehicle/engine combination.
Tuning goodies will include a VE table tuning process and an ECU file. If there is enough interest this bin can be included with each SpeedReader.
Any interest?
RBob.
Along with having a high speed data logging capability, the SpeedReader is also capable of being ROMLess.
Is there any interest in being able to run enhanced software in the ECM? This would include items such as dual VE tables: a high resolution low speed table and a medium resolution high speed table. Same for the SA., a low speed table and an extended table.
Other supprted functionality includes VATS, electric fan, shift light, two stage rev-limiter, valet mode, A/C control, IAC startup postion (prevents flare on startup), PE SA based on transmission gear (manual trans only), idle control via SA, idle SA setting, AE vs. RPM, extended delta TPS AE table, IAT/CTS blend for fueling, transient open loop modes, lean cruise, N-Alpha mode, and a host of other goodies. Note that there is no EGR or CCP in this code. It does support both a stick tranny and an auto with a TCC.
This is the code that I have been running for several years now. I added whatever it took to get a TBI setup to run well, very well.
I am currently using this code on two vehicles, a hot 327 and a stock LG4. It works with both. Different cals, same code. The code is setup so that functionality can be enabled or disabled via option bytes. This allows it to be used on different vehicles. Options can be changed dependent upon the vehicle/engine combination.
Tuning goodies will include a VE table tuning process and an ECU file. If there is enough interest this bin can be included with each SpeedReader.
Any interest?
RBob.
Thanks a bunch Bruce.
Bruce (90RS305)
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
Originally posted by JPrevost
RBob, you should have signed up to TGO with "DA MAN" as your user name.
RBob, you should have signed up to TGO with "DA MAN" as your user name.
#48
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Originally posted by JPrevost
RBob, you should have signed up to TGO with "DA MAN" as your user name.
RBob, you should have signed up to TGO with "DA MAN" as your user name.
Bruce (90RS305)
#49
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
To answer a couple of questions in one post. Yes, the code started out as '747 code. Only about 30% of the original code is left. The rest has been either re-written, or newly developed.
I did keep the $42 maskID byte. . .
My development philosophy with this code was to add/delete/change whatever was required in order to provide the functionality for a proper tune.
As far as which ECM I use, I have converted both the '747 and the '8063 to run all EPROM (on board ROMs disabled). I have a '8746 ECM that I was going to convert but felt it may have some value to a f-body TBI'er as is.
Once converted to ROMLess there is no difference between the ECMs.
RBob.
I did keep the $42 maskID byte. . .
My development philosophy with this code was to add/delete/change whatever was required in order to provide the functionality for a proper tune.
As far as which ECM I use, I have converted both the '747 and the '8063 to run all EPROM (on board ROMs disabled). I have a '8746 ECM that I was going to convert but felt it may have some value to a f-body TBI'er as is.
Once converted to ROMLess there is no difference between the ECMs.
RBob.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Red Deer, Canada
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Shortbox
Engine: 350 Vortec
Transmission: 700r4
RBOB,
How will it work with the 746 as well as the 747, I thought the only real differnce between the two was the MAT sensor on the 746.
How will it work with the 746 as well as the 747, I thought the only real differnce between the two was the MAT sensor on the 746.