Assembling Source Code.
09-21-2003, 07:30 PM
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Assembling Source Code.
Ok guys, I'm working on trying to get some source code to assemble. More specifically, the anht hac. There are three src files that need to be included that I don't have. They are: f2a.src, 8D_EQU.src, and 8D_ftest.src
Are these needed, or can I get rid of them? Are they additions, or patches, or just where the factory included the calib tables, and equates and such from a generic? I don't know!!!
Thanks!
Are these needed, or can I get rid of them? Are they additions, or patches, or just where the factory included the calib tables, and equates and such from a generic? I don't know!!!
Thanks!
09-21-2003, 07:35 PM
#2
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
A quick update:
I commented out those 3 lines and got a bunch more errors. I'm gonna look into them when I get time later tonight.
Any input will be appreciated!
I commented out those 3 lines and got a bunch more errors. I'm gonna look into them when I get time later tonight.
Any input will be appreciated!
09-23-2003, 08:28 PM
#3
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Well, I've been messing with the code some more, and now the assembler I'm using (ASM11d84) doesn't seem to like the L5000 address that's unassigned. That's the first error I need to get over. I have told it to use direct addressing for that line, and it changes it to a warning. Do I have to do this for all the addresses that are directly addressed (not previously defined)?
Hmmm.... Maybe when I get this working, I'll post a ECM Source Code for dummies so that someone else will be able to get help.
Hmmm.... Maybe when I get this working, I'll post a ECM Source Code for dummies so that someone else will be able to get help.
09-24-2003, 06:56 AM
#4
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by JP84Z430HP
Well, I've been messing with the code some more, and now the assembler I'm using (ASM11d84) doesn't seem to like the L5000 address that's unassigned. That's the first error I need to get over. I have told it to use direct addressing for that line, and it changes it to a warning. Do I have to do this for all the addresses that are directly addressed (not previously defined)?
Hmmm.... Maybe when I get this working, I'll post a ECM Source Code for dummies so that someone else will be able to get help.
Well, I've been messing with the code some more, and now the assembler I'm using (ASM11d84) doesn't seem to like the L5000 address that's unassigned. That's the first error I need to get over. I have told it to use direct addressing for that line, and it changes it to a warning. Do I have to do this for all the addresses that are directly addressed (not previously defined)?
Hmmm.... Maybe when I get this working, I'll post a ECM Source Code for dummies so that someone else will be able to get help.
Yes, comment out the include files (.src) as you did. Then for all of the memory locations that are not in the EPROM you will need an EQU. Start at L0000 and go through to L01FF and do this:
Code:
. . . L01B0 EQU $1B0 ; L01B1 EQU $1B1 ; L01B2 EQU $1B2 ; L01B3 EQU $1B3 ; L01B4 EQU $1B4 ; L01B5 EQU $1B5 ; L01B6 EQU $1B6 ; . . .
The assembler will complain every time another is found. Here is another block of them:
Code:
; -------------------------------------- ; HU RAM Equates ; -------------------------------------- L0456 EQU $0456 ; L0457 EQU $0457 ; L0458 EQU $0458 ; L0459 EQU $0459 ; L045B EQU $045B ; L045C EQU $045C ; L045E EQU $045E ; L0463 EQU $0463 ; L0465 EQU $0465 ; L0467 EQU $0467 ;
Code:
L3FC0 EQU $3FC0 ; DRP, Ref Period Timer L3FC2 EQU $3FC2 ; Timer #1 (Input 5) L3FC4 EQU $3FC4 ; Timer #2 (Input 6) L3FC6 EQU $3FC6 ; Cntr #1 (*** Pulses)
09-24-2003, 08:00 AM
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Awesome! I didn't know if I had to go throught all that, or if the thing could use direct addressing. I've done a SMALL amount of assembly code before (modifying what was already there!!!) so hopefully, once I get this assembling, I'll be able to get it in gear!
Oh yeah, commenting is crucial IMO. Makes a world of difference when you go to make changes!
Thanks for the response, and the examples! As soon as I get it assembling, I plan to take notes on what stuff I change, and possibly put that up on a web site for people to see. The only thing that worries me is keeping it IN the hands of the DIY crowd, and OUT of the hands of the profiteers....
Oh yeah, commenting is crucial IMO. Makes a world of difference when you go to make changes!
Thanks for the response, and the examples! As soon as I get it assembling, I plan to take notes on what stuff I change, and possibly put that up on a web site for people to see. The only thing that worries me is keeping it IN the hands of the DIY crowd, and OUT of the hands of the profiteers....
09-25-2003, 12:49 PM
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm also trying to assemble source code, But I don't think I am using the assembler right (asm11d84).
I disassembled my bin using CATS. I fixed errors one by one, and now it goes through pass 1 with no errors. When it's done, I get the following:
Warning: insufficient heap memory <use MAPOFF> skipped
Assembled changed.src <11564 lines> 11562 bytes
1 file processed!
When I look for an output file, I can't find one.
Am I even close to getting this right?
Does anyone have a good source file that I can practice assembling with, just to make sure i'm using as11 right? (I copied Aujp.HAC) and tried that, but it does not seem to copy to notepad correctly from PDF.
I disassembled my bin using CATS. I fixed errors one by one, and now it goes through pass 1 with no errors. When it's done, I get the following:
Warning: insufficient heap memory <use MAPOFF> skipped
Assembled changed.src <11564 lines> 11562 bytes
1 file processed!
When I look for an output file, I can't find one.
Am I even close to getting this right?
Does anyone have a good source file that I can practice assembling with, just to make sure i'm using as11 right? (I copied Aujp.HAC) and tried that, but it does not seem to copy to notepad correctly from PDF.
09-25-2003, 07:00 PM
#7
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Yeah, I'mhaving the copy from pdf problem also. I had to go through and put all the tabs back in that it needed. Man what a pain! Then I found out that there are some pdf to txt converters out there, but that was after I got the file tabbed back the way it should be.
I just finished the equates on the anht hac, and now I'm movin on to the other errors.
Are some of the errors that I've seen in there from GM's original code? I can't remember what they were, but a few of them wouldn't stop it from compiling, but something was obviously wrong in it...
I just finished the equates on the anht hac, and now I'm movin on to the other errors.
Are some of the errors that I've seen in there from GM's original code? I can't remember what they were, but a few of them wouldn't stop it from compiling, but something was obviously wrong in it...
Trending Topics
09-26-2003, 06:59 AM
#8
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by JP84Z430HP
I just finished the equates on the anht hac, and now I'm movin on to the other errors.
Are some of the errors that I've seen in there from GM's original code? I can't remember what they were, but a few of them wouldn't stop it from compiling, but something was obviously wrong in it...
I just finished the equates on the anht hac, and now I'm movin on to the other errors.
Are some of the errors that I've seen in there from GM's original code? I can't remember what they were, but a few of them wouldn't stop it from compiling, but something was obviously wrong in it...
Another thing to remember is that the ANHT hac is not perfect. There are a couple of typo's along with a table or two that are the wrong length (number of rows).
Once you get a bin created from the assembled source do a binary compare against a true copy of ANHT.BIN. This will show you where the differences are. Then work on them (from the beginning) until it creates a comparable bin.
A table missing from ANHT_hac is the SA vs coolant. Was probably in the F2A.SRC file:
Code:
;======================================= ; ; COOL SA TBL, 12 BLKS ; $8138 - $81A7 ; ; TBL = (VAL + L8137) * (256/90) ;======================================= L8138: FCB 32 ; START AT -16 FCB 0 ; FCB 9 ; ; VAC 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ; Deg C FCB 100, 100, 114, 108, 94, 77, 77, 77, 77 ; -16 FCB 100, 100, 114, 108, 94, 77, 77, 77, 77 ; -4 FCB 100, 100, 114, 108, 94, 77, 77, 77, 77 ; 8 FCB 85, 85, 85, 85, 85, 77, 77, 77, 77 ; 20 FCB 57, 85, 85, 85, 85, 77, 77, 77, 77 ; 32 FCB 57, 85, 85, 85, 85, 77, 77, 77, 77 ; 44 FCB 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57 ; 56 FCB 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57 ; 68 FCB 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57 ; 80 FCB 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57 ; 92 FCB 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57 ; 104 FCB 57, 57, 57, 57, 51, 40, 40, 40, 40 ; 116
09-26-2003, 08:19 AM
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Thanks for your help RBob!
The errors I'm talking about aren't affecting the assembly, but more things that just don't seem right, I'll have to find an example next time I'm in there working on it. The, too, it may be just typo's in the hac!
Thanks for the SA table though! I see where it goes, and I'm gonn drop what ya sent in there, just to make it closer, then I'll see about making it "Right"!
Thanks again, and be prepared, I'll prolly have more issues as I get deeper into this!
The errors I'm talking about aren't affecting the assembly, but more things that just don't seem right, I'll have to find an example next time I'm in there working on it. The, too, it may be just typo's in the hac!
Thanks for the SA table though! I see where it goes, and I'm gonn drop what ya sent in there, just to make it closer, then I'll see about making it "Right"!
Thanks again, and be prepared, I'll prolly have more issues as I get deeper into this!
09-26-2003, 12:07 PM
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm down to 8 errors. (and 1000's of warnings)
All look like this:
"ERR* ANHT.TXT (11885) "LD6B5" is too far forward [4], use jumps"
The instructions say I should either rewrite to use JMP or move them closer together.
What's the advice?
Thanks
MIke
All look like this:
"ERR* ANHT.TXT (11885) "LD6B5" is too far forward [4], use jumps"
Code:
LD62E: BRCLR L0046,#$20,LD63F ; BR IF NOT b5
; B5 1 = IN PWR ENRICH
; ... else
LDAB L010E ; GET PORT AIR TMR
CMPB 0,X
BEQ LD6B5 ; DIVERT IF IN P.E. TOO LONG
; ... else
INCB ; INCR PORT AIR TIMER
STAB L010E ; SAVE NEW PORT AIR TMR
;
BRA LD6A0 ;
LD63F CLR L010E ; PORT AIR TMR What's the advice?
Thanks
MIke
09-26-2003, 01:16 PM
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by novakm
I'm down to 8 errors. (and 1000's of warnings)
All look like this:
"ERR* ANHT.TXT (11885) "LD6B5" is too far forward [4], use jumps"
.
.
.
The instructions say I should either rewrite to use JMP or move them closer together.
What's the advice?
Thanks
MIke
I'm down to 8 errors. (and 1000's of warnings)
All look like this:
"ERR* ANHT.TXT (11885) "LD6B5" is too far forward [4], use jumps"
.
.
.
The instructions say I should either rewrite to use JMP or move them closer together.
What's the advice?
Thanks
MIke
Code:
27 7c BEQ LD6B5 ; DIVERT IF IN P.E. TOO LONG
RBob.
09-26-2003, 02:32 PM
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RBob,
Thanks for the help.
I checked line for line against the one I dissasembled from a .BIN, and I cannot find extra code. Must be something else the assembler is picking up.
I'm gonna keep looking
Mike
Thanks for the help.
I checked line for line against the one I dissasembled from a .BIN, and I cannot find extra code. Must be something else the assembler is picking up.
I'm gonna keep looking
Mike
09-26-2003, 06:56 PM
#13
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
RBob,
I put that table in, but I couldn't just add it in the way you had it in the post. I had to drop each line down like in the other tables. I ran it through the assembler, and it checked out ok, so I think it'll work ok.
NovaKM,
I'll let you know when, but I'm working on putting what I'm working with on the web, and I'll update it when I get things changed around. Right now, I'm primarily working on the way the code looks. I put all the equates in order, as I plan to comment them, and it will be easier to find them if they're in order. It also proved to be a good exercise to bruch up on HEX. I'll get ya a link soon!
I put that table in, but I couldn't just add it in the way you had it in the post. I had to drop each line down like in the other tables. I ran it through the assembler, and it checked out ok, so I think it'll work ok.
NovaKM,
I'll let you know when, but I'm working on putting what I'm working with on the web, and I'll update it when I get things changed around. Right now, I'm primarily working on the way the code looks. I put all the equates in order, as I plan to comment them, and it will be easier to find them if they're in order. It also proved to be a good exercise to bruch up on HEX. I'll get ya a link soon!
09-26-2003, 08:10 PM
#14
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
I have put up a link on my webspace, along with the hac that I'm working on. I'll try to keep it updated, along with notes on what I'm doing with it.
Oh yeah, Here's the link:
http://home.alltel.net/jporter12/
As you can prolly tell, I have no life, that's why I'm in front of the computer on Friday night! LOL I'm going to go get some beers now!
Oh yeah, Here's the link:
http://home.alltel.net/jporter12/
As you can prolly tell, I have no life, that's why I'm in front of the computer on Friday night! LOL I'm going to go get some beers now!
Last edited by JP84Z430HP; 09-26-2003 at 08:12 PM.
09-27-2003, 12:55 PM
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JP,
Thanks for the link. It assembles with no errors! congratulations!:hail:
I cut a "problem" section of code from my attemptand pasted it into yours, and that assembled also.
There must be something elsewhere my code that's messing me up.
Thanks again
Mike
Thanks for the link. It assembles with no errors! congratulations!:hail:
I cut a "problem" section of code from my attemptand pasted it into yours, and that assembled also.
There must be something elsewhere my code that's messing me up.
Thanks again
Mike
10-02-2003, 07:38 PM
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I've almost got it.
Did a byte by byte compare with a known good ANHT BIN after getting it to assemble. Took a lot of time to fix each place where they did not match (there were thousands). Most were caused by typos.
only things left now are how to fill large areas of the BIN with $00. The assembler uses $FF by default
There are also a few lines at FFEE to FFFF that are not in the HAC.
MIke
Did a byte by byte compare with a known good ANHT BIN after getting it to assemble. Took a lot of time to fix each place where they did not match (there were thousands). Most were caused by typos.
only things left now are how to fill large areas of the BIN with $00. The assembler uses $FF by default
There are also a few lines at FFEE to FFFF that are not in the HAC.
MIke
10-03-2003, 06:46 AM
#19
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes
on
211 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by novakm
Well, I've almost got it.
Did a byte by byte compare with a known good ANHT BIN after getting it to assemble. Took a lot of time to fix each place where they did not match (there were thousands). Most were caused by typos.
only things left now are how to fill large areas of the BIN with $00. The assembler uses $FF by default
There are also a few lines at FFEE to FFFF that are not in the HAC.
MIke
Well, I've almost got it.
Did a byte by byte compare with a known good ANHT BIN after getting it to assemble. Took a lot of time to fix each place where they did not match (there were thousands). Most were caused by typos.
only things left now are how to fill large areas of the BIN with $00. The assembler uses $FF by default
There are also a few lines at FFEE to FFFF that are not in the HAC.
MIke
FILL $00, $B000-*
RBob.
10-04-2003, 08:05 PM
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I did IT! 
It assembles correctly. The BIN matches the stock ANHT perfectly. Even the checksum is OK.
Thanks Guys :hail:
My next step is to compare it to the AUJP BIN I use.
I think I learned a lot about programming in the process.
It assembles correctly. The BIN matches the stock ANHT perfectly. Even the checksum is OK.Thanks Guys :hail:
My next step is to compare it to the AUJP BIN I use.
I think I learned a lot about programming in the process.
10-05-2003, 01:45 AM
#21
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Johnstown, Ohio
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355 (fastburn heads, LT4 HOT cam)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt, 3.27
Learning is the key to all of this! That is the primary reason that I am pursuing DIY-EFI, more to learn about how it works ( ideal with it at work but not to this level) and how to make it do what I want it to do!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
9
10-19-2016 08:50 AM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
1
10-13-2015 03:06 PM
