Liquid cooled exhaust
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
Liquid cooled exhaust
Any of you guys ever think of cooling down your exhaust.
I have an idea that I havn't yet and honestly probably never will try:
Liquid cooled exhaust. Basically an exhaust system inside a larger diameter pipe that is filled with antifreeze running through it and beeing cooled by a radiator. This isn't necessary all the way back, probably just till the h-pipe, but definately as far to the front as possible, even the headers if possible but space constraints would hinder that.
So what do you guys think? Could it work, and what do you think the power increase would be like? or am I just crazy?
I have an idea that I havn't yet and honestly probably never will try:
Liquid cooled exhaust. Basically an exhaust system inside a larger diameter pipe that is filled with antifreeze running through it and beeing cooled by a radiator. This isn't necessary all the way back, probably just till the h-pipe, but definately as far to the front as possible, even the headers if possible but space constraints would hinder that.
So what do you guys think? Could it work, and what do you think the power increase would be like? or am I just crazy?
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: Can you say stroke?!?!
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I'd say it's probably as usefull as muffler bearings.
That's my opinion though.
That's my opinion though.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
Why would you say that. A cooler exhasut would mean more exhaust fumes allowed to escapte through, warm gases displace more volume then cooler gases, and I think it would increase your exhaust scavenging, which in turn should increase power as well.
#4
I think you would run into a problem with high backpressure. A cool gas moves with less velocity than a hot gas, therefore, any gains made would just be offset by increased backpressure. Just my .02
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
Interesting, you might be right. Have you ever heard of anyone trying something like this, possibly in drag racing?
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Annandale,NJ
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
umm....i don't think that the weight it would add would be worth the gains....and y do they make exhaust wrap...to keep the exhaust HOT...not to cool it down. the hot air moves faster.
#7
Originally posted by Astro
I think you would run into a problem with high backpressure. A cool gas moves with less velocity than a hot gas, therefore, any gains made would just be offset by increased backpressure. Just my .02
I think you would run into a problem with high backpressure. A cool gas moves with less velocity than a hot gas, therefore, any gains made would just be offset by increased backpressure. Just my .02
Not to mention trying to cool exhaust would be problematic at best. 800-1000 degree exhaust heat would boil coolant almost instantly.
While you're at it, try hooking up a vacuum cleaner to the tail pipe... :sillylol:
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
I was under the impression that header wrap was to keep the engine compartment cooler thus resulting in cooler air/fuel mixture, = more power. Why would a hotter exhaust be beneficial? Running colder plugs, i.e. detonating at a lower temperature is beneficial. Everyone is always trying to generate as less heat as possible so to result in pinging. So far everything I've read on engines tells me that lower temperatures for everything is beneficial. Obviously we can't cool down 800-1000 degree temperature to the point were we can touch it, but if we can lower it 100 degrees would that not have an impact? and at what point does the velocity of hot gases plateau, if it does at all? If the velocity would remain constant say after 500 degrees then decreasing your exhaust temperature froms 800 to 700 would be beneficial, and besides thise temperatures are at the headers not through the exhaust, otherwise that type of heat would translate into very warm passenger compartments, so obviously the exhaust gases cool off rather quickly down their little voyage. Oh and that's also the reason that after the muffler you don't need large tailpipes. the gases are cooler thus require less displacement to move. Oh and if warmer gases, and I would imagine this applies to air as well, have a greater velocity then why is everyone building "cold air" induction systems? instead of warm air induction systems? I might be way off on this, but I just don't beleive the arguments thus far. Can someone actually explain these theories instead of just dismissing them. Oh and I am not trying to be a ball buster, just curious is all!
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
#11
BOATS
My boat has liquid cooled manifolds. The only reason they do that is to keep the temps down inside the engine compartment as it would be a catostrophic fire hazard if you had regular manifolds.
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: NE
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 82 camaro SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
You want the hotter exhaust, like they said above it helps the exhaust flow. You can't compare cold air induction with the exhaust. Cold air is more dense, to create more potential power. But cold air flows slower than hot less dense air(you also have to keep in mind that the difference it temps from a regular induction to cold air induction isn't that huge compared to exhaust temp changes with/without header wrap). Ram air is where you will see gains in power since the cool air is forced in. Hot air is less dense and flows faster--good for exhaust. All that matters with exhaust is flow--cooling the exhaust(making it more dense) has no effect on power potential because it's on the way out of the engine. Instead, a cooler exhaust will only slow the exhaust flow down. If that exhaust was reburned in the engine, then sure it would help power--but it isn't.
Another effect of header wrap is that the underhood temps can be lower. The best situation would be to have the whole exhaust system wrapped in header wrap. The benefits past the header would be small, but it you want to try something unique....
Another effect of header wrap is that the underhood temps can be lower. The best situation would be to have the whole exhaust system wrapped in header wrap. The benefits past the header would be small, but it you want to try something unique....
Last edited by 82camaro; 05-30-2002 at 01:50 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS Convertible
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 peg leg
was under the impression that header wrap was to keep the engine compartment cooler thus resulting in cooler air/fuel mixture, = more power. Why would a hotter exhaust be beneficial? Running colder plugs, i.e. detonating at a lower temperature is beneficial. Everyone is always trying to generate as less heat as possible so to result in pinging. So far everything I've read on engines tells me that lower temperatures for everything is beneficial. .. the gases are cooler thus require less displacement to move. Oh and if warmer gases, and I would imagine this applies to air as well, have a greater velocity then why is everyone building "cold air" induction systems? instead of warm air induction systems? I might be way off on this, but I just don't beleive the arguments thus far. Can someone actually explain these theories instead of just dismissing them. Oh and I am not trying to be a ball buster, just curious is all!
Cooling exhaust gasses would also increase chances of turbulance, which is a different issue altogether. So to sum up, you want cold going in, and hot going out. The colder it is going in, and the hotter it is going out, the more efficiently your engine can operate, especially at higher RPM's. I should note that this is a VERY oversimplified explanation, but hopefully, you get the idea.
James
#14
Supreme Member
not to mention that if your running a cat. cold exhaust will render it useless, and eventual prematurley kill the cat..
but you can't compare intake temps and exhaust temps.. it is true that headres are wrapped or ceramic coated not only to keep temps down in the engine compartment, but to keep the exhaust hot so you can get a few extra ponies.. plus, what kind of radiator would you have to use to get rid of that much heat?
but you can't compare intake temps and exhaust temps.. it is true that headres are wrapped or ceramic coated not only to keep temps down in the engine compartment, but to keep the exhaust hot so you can get a few extra ponies.. plus, what kind of radiator would you have to use to get rid of that much heat?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS Convertible
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 peg leg
was under the impression that header wrap was to keep the engine compartment cooler thus resulting in cooler air/fuel mixture, = more power. Why would a hotter exhaust be beneficial? Running colder plugs, i.e. detonating at a lower temperature is beneficial. Everyone is always trying to generate as less heat as possible so to result in pinging. So far everything I've read on engines tells me that lower temperatures for everything is beneficial. .. the gases are cooler thus require less displacement to move. Oh and if warmer gases, and I would imagine this applies to air as well, have a greater velocity then why is everyone building "cold air" induction systems? instead of warm air induction systems? I might be way off on this, but I just don't beleive the arguments thus far. Can someone actually explain these theories instead of just dismissing them. Oh and I am not trying to be a ball buster, just curious is all!
Cooling exhaust gasses would also increase chances of turbulance, which is a different issue altogether. So to sum up, you want cold going in, and hot going out. The colder it is going in, and the hotter it is going out, the more efficiently your engine can operate, especially at higher RPM's. I should note that this is a VERY oversimplified explanation, but hopefully, you get the idea.
James
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
James,
I get the idea...I was just throwing this topic in to help this messsage board out, but I really appreciate the time and effort you put into explaining it to me rather than replying in a condescending manner.
I understand the concept of cold air induction and now I also fully understand the need for a hot exhaust. I was just hypothesizing that a cooler, thus less voluminous exhaust might be beneficial but now I see the flaw in this theory.
I get the idea...I was just throwing this topic in to help this messsage board out, but I really appreciate the time and effort you put into explaining it to me rather than replying in a condescending manner.
I understand the concept of cold air induction and now I also fully understand the need for a hot exhaust. I was just hypothesizing that a cooler, thus less voluminous exhaust might be beneficial but now I see the flaw in this theory.
#18
Originally posted by breathment
thats cool.. remember, there is no such thing as a stupid question, cause i know i''ve sure asked a bunch here.... we all have to learn somehow.
thats cool.. remember, there is no such thing as a stupid question, cause i know i''ve sure asked a bunch here.... we all have to learn somehow.
#19
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Fairfield, CT
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engines depend on a pressure differential in order to operate efficiently. The greater the differential, the more efficient the engine. Gasses and liquids naturally tend to move from an area of high pressure (generally colder and denser) to an area of low pressure (generally hotter and less dense).
I just read everything n still think he's got a point. First off high pressure is hardly ever associated with cold n dense gasses. If you look at the equation PV = nRT ( i assume most of u know some chemistry)... u can see that if T (temp.) is increased.. pressure is directly increased. Thus, areas of high temp. are generally high in pressure, and if allowed to expand, shall become less dense. So the part above about moving from high pressure to low pressure is correct, but not the part about high pressure being cold and dense. Now, to move on, it seems to me that if you were to cool the exhaust discharge (assume no cat) its pressure and volume would in turn decrease (as can be proven by the equation above again). If the exhaust then takes up less volume, then it would seem to me that it would be able to travel through the same diameter pipe at a much higher rate of speed. Also, decreasing the temp would result in lower pressure... also known as backpressure. So again it would seem to me that backpressure would also be greatly reduced if the exhaust discharge was cooled. So.. there's my .02...n from what I know about chemistry.. this would seem to be correct.. but... feel free to prove me wrong.
Patrick DeGrosse Jr.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
James is on the mark.
There is a theory that keeping your air injection system on full time helps heat up the headers. By injecting the fresh oxygen rich air into the headers they will react with the unburned fuel. This is a side effect and not the primary reason for the air injection system. AIR's purpose is to heat up the o2 sensor and the cat converter.
You can't really run the air injection system on an EFI car because it's an exhaust leak before the o2 sensor. You'll get a high reading of oxygen and the ecm will think lean condition and dump in gops of fuel. So....running a carb, try it out, running with EFI, out of luck.
There is a theory that keeping your air injection system on full time helps heat up the headers. By injecting the fresh oxygen rich air into the headers they will react with the unburned fuel. This is a side effect and not the primary reason for the air injection system. AIR's purpose is to heat up the o2 sensor and the cat converter.
You can't really run the air injection system on an EFI car because it's an exhaust leak before the o2 sensor. You'll get a high reading of oxygen and the ecm will think lean condition and dump in gops of fuel. So....running a carb, try it out, running with EFI, out of luck.
#21
Pat,
Good use of chemistry. But think of it this way, all gases are fluids, and as all fluids decrease in temp, they become more viscous (resistant to flow). Therefore cooling a gas would only make it flow slower, and the build up of gas in the exhaust system would cause much more backpressure than high temp, high pressure, but much faster moving gases.
Good use of chemistry. But think of it this way, all gases are fluids, and as all fluids decrease in temp, they become more viscous (resistant to flow). Therefore cooling a gas would only make it flow slower, and the build up of gas in the exhaust system would cause much more backpressure than high temp, high pressure, but much faster moving gases.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
I am really enjoying this exchange of ideas, but I have to disagree with yo Astro that gases are fluids....fluids and gases are two seperate states of various elements.
Patrick thanks for the support, but my knowledge of chemistry is to rudementry to either support or acknowledge the fault in this idea. I am just glad the debate continues.
Patrick thanks for the support, but my knowledge of chemistry is to rudementry to either support or acknowledge the fault in this idea. I am just glad the debate continues.
#24
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Fairfield, CT
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and as all fluids decrease in temp, they become more viscous (resistant to flow).
Patrick DeGrosse Jr.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS Convertible
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 peg leg
Hey, poncho, I didn't mean to imply you were asking a stoopid question at all. I have learned so much from these boards myself. In fact, I applaud you for putting your nuts on the line and trying to come up with an idea. I wasn't trying to shoot it down or anything.
Ahh, yes. but as a gas increases its velocity, its pressure also decreases to a degree greater than that to which heating it has any effect (at least with respect to a combustion engine). If you were to measure the pressure differences on the intake side and the exhaust side, you would find that they are huge!! The reason why is that the air moving in is moving in much slower than that which is moving out; and good thing, because if it weren't, then you would have some serious detonation ! Another reason why high pressure is associated with cool, dense air, is because of the proximity of the molecules in the gas. The molecules on the intake side are so close together (because they are moving so slow), while the molecules on the intake side are very far apart (because they are moving so quickly). So far apart, in fact, that it doesn't make much difference how hot they are. Another example used to illustrate the cold:high pressure:: hot: low pressure analogy is the weather. If you look at the weather report, you'll see that high pressure systems are associated with cold, dense air. I'm sorry that this is so convoluted, but I'm doing the best I can without throwing a lot of calculus into the explanation. I could split hairs and talk about the difference between a pressure 'differential' and a pressure 'difference' but that would also involve some hairy calculus. I hope that this helps!
James
So the part above about moving from high pressure to low pressure is correct, but not the part about high pressure being cold and dense. Now, to move on, it seems to me that if you were to cool the exhaust discharge (assume no cat) its pressure and volume would in turn decrease (as can be proven by the equation above again). If the exhaust then takes up less volume, then it would seem to me that it would be able to travel through the same diameter pipe at a much higher rate of speed. Also, decreasing the temp would result in lower pressure
James
#26
Actually Patrick,
A cold gas has much less kinetic energy than a hot gas, proven in many experiments and therefore not debateable. Since kinetic energy (KE) is attained by:
KE = 0.5*m*v*v
where m is the mass of the gas, same when hot or cold
and v is the velocity.
So if KE is higher for a hot gas, then velocity must be higher, as 0.5 and mass are both constants.
Therefore a cooler exhaust gas temp would be more detrimental to max power, but the setup for such a cooler could look unique on a show car.
Also, on your PV=nRT, this usually only applies to closed systems. Since the exhaust is open at the end, the increase in pressure will help push the gas out of the exhaust system.
A cold gas has much less kinetic energy than a hot gas, proven in many experiments and therefore not debateable. Since kinetic energy (KE) is attained by:
KE = 0.5*m*v*v
where m is the mass of the gas, same when hot or cold
and v is the velocity.
So if KE is higher for a hot gas, then velocity must be higher, as 0.5 and mass are both constants.
Therefore a cooler exhaust gas temp would be more detrimental to max power, but the setup for such a cooler could look unique on a show car.
Also, on your PV=nRT, this usually only applies to closed systems. Since the exhaust is open at the end, the increase in pressure will help push the gas out of the exhaust system.
Last edited by Astro; 05-31-2002 at 12:13 AM.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 RS Convertible
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 peg leg
Astro, you summed up my points eloquently with the good old KE = mv^2. Exactly what I was getting at. KE translates directly to temperature and proximity of the molecules.
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UCIrvine or SFV, CA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LS1 - 346 ci
Transmission: 4L60E
Who would've thought taking AP Chemistry would come in handy in exhaust cooling.... :lala:
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Laval, Canada
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
I should've paid attention in chemistry class ....thanks guys, great debate with actual science backing it. These are the type of dialogues we should be having on message boards, not the usual cyberjunk that I spend most time sifting through to find something of interest to read. As you tell by my post #s I don't often engage myself in the posts here, but I have been lurking for a couple of years now.
#30
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New Fairfield, CT
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another example used to illustrate the cold:high pressure:: hot: low pressure analogy is the weather. If you look at the weather report, you'll see that high pressure systems are associated with cold, dense air.
BTW I've also taken physics n calculus 1 and 2 so feel free to go into the calculus.
Also, on your PV=nRT, this usually only applies to closed systems.
So if KE is higher for a hot gas, then velocity must be higher
BTW... anyone ever heard of this being tested before? I do alot of kart racing too with the trust briggs.. i'm contemplating testing this theory on a kart engine with an extended header.
Patrick DeGrosse Jr.
#31
A point that was not discussed much here is scavenging. I don't know all the physics so bear with me. Here goes... As the valve opens and the piston pushes the gas out it is expanding very rapidly and moving at a high velocity. The exhaust gas charge will actually create a vacuum behind it because of the speed at which it is moving and the loss off pressure as it cools. To get a benefit from this you want the exhausts as hot as possible as it leaves the header/ manifold and to let it cool farther down the pipe. This effect will actually help pull all the exhaust out of the cylinder plus provide a lower pressure so the next piston does not have to work as hard to push the exhaust out. Thus less power needed to push exhaust = more power to push wheels.
Now for the cold air theory. Cold air is denser the hot air (not rocket science). Cold air does create more atmospheric pressure because it is denser so all the weight of the air above pushes down and creates more pressure at the surface, enough earth science. Cold air helps car get more power by having more oxygen in the in the same size of area allowing the engine to burn more fuel. Cold air being denser also slightly raises the compression in the cylinder giving the engine more power. Colder air also reduces the risk of detonation. A cold air intake kit is a good cost effective way to increase Hp with minimal work.
Feal free to correct me on anything. THis is my understanding off how things work... plus hangovers never help while trying to have clear thoughts.
Now for the cold air theory. Cold air is denser the hot air (not rocket science). Cold air does create more atmospheric pressure because it is denser so all the weight of the air above pushes down and creates more pressure at the surface, enough earth science. Cold air helps car get more power by having more oxygen in the in the same size of area allowing the engine to burn more fuel. Cold air being denser also slightly raises the compression in the cylinder giving the engine more power. Colder air also reduces the risk of detonation. A cold air intake kit is a good cost effective way to increase Hp with minimal work.
Feal free to correct me on anything. THis is my understanding off how things work... plus hangovers never help while trying to have clear thoughts.
Last edited by TS b4c; 06-01-2002 at 12:08 PM.
#32
Ok, i recently did this in AP Chemistry, so my memory is kinda good about the subject, I have shown the following graph below.
Now, Temperature is a measure of Kinetic Energy so in a cold gas has less Kinetic energy then a hot gas, look at the graph below.
Here is a direct quote from my text book
<p>
what it means it that when preesure if applied to the exhaust pipes(system) the gases will look for the area with the lowest pressure(outside through the tips), therefore when the pressure is lowered(cooling exhaust) the speed at which the gases will look for a lower pressure will decrease thereby actually slowing it down. High pressure can olny exsist with high temperatures.
<p>
Ok well there is my .02, I have more formula's and graphs if somebody would like me to post more to prove my theory.
Now, Temperature is a measure of Kinetic Energy so in a cold gas has less Kinetic energy then a hot gas, look at the graph below.
Here is a direct quote from my text book
<p>
As pressure on the system increases the equilibrium will shift toward the side with the least pressure.
<p>
Ok well there is my .02, I have more formula's and graphs if somebody would like me to post more to prove my theory.
#33
Supreme Member
holy crap, I never dreamed that AP Chemistry would actually come in handy and be put to use! just wanted to say good job to everyone who used science and math to back up what they were saying instead of the "its right because I said it is and you cant change my mind" mentality. its more discussions like this that we need on this board
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by TS b4c
Colder air also reduces the risk of detonation. A cold air intake kit is a good cost effective way to increase Hp with minimal work.
Feal free to correct me on anything. THis is my understanding off how things work... plus hangovers never help while trying to have clear thoughts.
Colder air also reduces the risk of detonation. A cold air intake kit is a good cost effective way to increase Hp with minimal work.
Feal free to correct me on anything. THis is my understanding off how things work... plus hangovers never help while trying to have clear thoughts.
EGR will let exhaust gas (almost no oxygen) mix with the intake charge to cool down the combustion chamber. This enables you to run more timing for better gas milage. The reason you can run more timing with EGR is because it's less likely to detonate and by now you should know that a lean AFR can run with more timing and a richer condition needs less. It's all about tuning and a nice balance, you can't look at one thing and not the other when it isn't JUST air going into the engine, it's got fuel too.
As for the exhaust hot or cold, hotter the better. Yes header wrap cools down the engine compartment but it also helps free up a little more power. Don't forget, heat is a sign of energy loss. This makes me think that if you ran in open loop or have a carb, keep the air injection system and have it pump all the time to keep those headers hot (good ol' Smokey Yunik's theory).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM