91-92 firebird vert with no gfx
08-20-2006 | 04:12 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Car: 1991 Z28 (sold)
91-92 firebird vert with no gfx
im guessing you couldnt get one like that from the factory, but im wondering what it would look like. I love 91-92 Formulas and im basically wondering what they would look like as convertibles. does anyone have pictures of this?
thank you
thank you
08-21-2006 | 02:49 AM
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
They look like ***.
I've seen quite a few running around here. All of them black which is weird. But they're all pretty hideous.
I've seen quite a few running around here. All of them black which is weird. But they're all pretty hideous.
Trending Topics
08-21-2006 | 10:55 AM
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Car: 1987 Chevy Stepside
Engine: 350 TBI w/ a Cam
Transmission: 3 Speed Stick w/ granny low
Lol now I wanna see a pick of how horrible that could possibly look. IMO slap a 87 TA front end on and call it a day. I am not a huge fan of the beak like nose of 91's and 92's.
08-29-2006 | 10:23 PM
#11
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
From: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Car: 1992 Jade Green---Trans Am Converti
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Well since you are serial...
Here's a picture of a formula vert. The 91-92 will look the same under the doors. As you can see, not too pretty..
BTW, this took about two minutes to find by going through the 9 page "Your Convertibles" thread stuck at the top.
Kevin D.
Here's a picture of a formula vert. The 91-92 will look the same under the doors. As you can see, not too pretty..
BTW, this took about two minutes to find by going through the 9 page "Your Convertibles" thread stuck at the top.
Kevin D.
08-30-2006 | 12:18 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 2
From: Indianapolis
Car: 1991 Z28 (sold)
DUDE!!! thats sweet!!! with the 91 nose that would look so sexy
paint the subframes red and ur good to go
i knew once i told you guys i was serial you would listen to me
paint the subframes red and ur good to go
i knew once i told you guys i was serial you would listen to me
09-05-2006 | 08:56 AM
#13
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 171
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Actually I do not think they look all that bad without the ground effects. However I will admit they do look better with the ground effects.
When ASC did the convesions they would rivet the subframe connecter down the rocker panel. They also did the J body conversions that did not have ground effects so they used the same extrusion to cover the rivets ( I have yet to find out if the J body is shorter or longer than the F-body between the wheel wells, if there longer I will be getting some of the trim pieces to modify for stock.
The clips that hold on the piece are still available through GM.
John
When ASC did the convesions they would rivet the subframe connecter down the rocker panel. They also did the J body conversions that did not have ground effects so they used the same extrusion to cover the rivets ( I have yet to find out if the J body is shorter or longer than the F-body between the wheel wells, if there longer I will be getting some of the trim pieces to modify for stock.
The clips that hold on the piece are still available through GM.
John
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
