Carburetors Carb discussion and questions. Upgrading your Third Gen's carburetor, swapping TBI to carburetor, or TPI to carburetor? Need LG4 or H.O. info? Post it here.

Edeldbrock q-jets VS a PERFORMER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-30-2001, 06:52 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
fulo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: FLA (US) & PTY
Posts: 203
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Z-28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Stock
Edeldbrock q-jets VS a PERFORMER


> I have put an ZZ3 built alike Gm 350 V8 motor on my 1987 Camaro.
>
> I have run the car with the stock carburetor and ignition, but have I decided complete convert my vehicle to mechanical mean by disengaging the computer for good and put and after marked ignitions system and a carburetor. SMog testing on this vehicle is not and issue.
>
>
> What I have:
>
> 350 V8 ZZ3 engine
> camshaft ( 208/221 @ .50)
> eldelbrock performer aluminum
intake manifold
> Trick flow twisted wedge aluminum heads (10:1 C/R)
> Edelbrock T.E.S headers for 1988 Camaro
>
>
> I am in a dilemma. Have to carburetor I am considering... I want that will give me more Horsepower, the most reliable. This two carbutors has the emission provision. eventhougth the vehicle doesn't have to pass emission inspection, I am environmental conscious, and want carburetor that will give the right mixture for complete combustion. On the same token, I want maximum horsepower. Which of the two carburetor will you recommend?
>
> Edelbrock Q-jet M4M 1980-1986.
> Performer 600 CFM Carburator (P/N EDE 1400) Street legal. electric choke
>


THANKS,

MIKE

P.S.: SHould I use a vacum advance distributor?? as oppose to a regular one?
Old 01-31-2001, 12:39 AM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
I'm a q-jet man, so that would be my first recommendation. However, the new Edelbrock q-jet you mentioned will cost right at twice what the Performer will cost. So, you'll have to decide. Either would give good performance and run cleanly when properly tuned.

With either one, you'll be eliminating the computer control, so you will have to go with a vacuum/mechanical advance distributor. Your stock unit will not work properly without the computer.

------------------
82 Berlinetta, orig V-6 car, now w/86 LG4/TH700R. 2.93 limited slip. Cat-back from '91 GTA, Accel HEI SuperCoil. AMSOIL syn lubes bumper-to-bumper. Daily driver, work-in-progress (LG4 w/LB9 block, ZZ3 cam and intake, WP 305 heads ported & polished, Hooker headers & y-pipe, hi-flow cat).
57 Bel Air, my 1st car. 0.030 over 396, Weiand Action+, Edelbrock 1901 Q-Jet, Jacobs Omnipack, 1-3/4" headers, TH400 w/TCI Sat Night Special conv & shift kit, 3.08 10-bolt, AMSOIL syn lubes bumper-to-bumper. Best 15.1 @ 5800' Bandimere. Daily driver while Camaro was being put together.
Old 02-01-2001, 12:37 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
burnoutrpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: outerspace(maybe..pluto)?
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I WOULD NATURALLY SAY A EDLEBROck 600 but,,.... im having problems with mine soo i'll stay out of this!! but normally a 600 would feed this great ... goood luck!

------------------
1989 firebird formula

Mods: converted from T.B.I. to a carburator 305 to a 350. Flowmater exhaust,hedman shortie hedders,202 heads,350 horse cam,bored.40 over, Edlebrock torker2 and a 600 edlebrock manual choke.

Future mods performer rpm air gap intake (polished) comp roller cam, and way better headsa 400 defintely in the works!
Old 02-03-2001, 01:36 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
Fast-Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Commiskey,In.,U.S.
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the q-jets but they can be finicky
as for Edelbrock runs good out of the box
good street strip carb but if gas milage is
not a concern Holly 650 double pumper,change
the jets to 71 primary 75 secondary.
Old 02-03-2001, 07:21 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
The ODB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Belleville, IL USA
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definately Edlebrock 600,
and go with an MSD vacuum advance distributor.



------------------
White 1986 Irocz, 305/383 with Edlebrock Performer-RPM intake and Performer #1407 carburetor, +110hp shot of crack, 700R-4 tranny, 3.25:1 rear, Mcreary Road-Stars, single 3" Borla exhaust, Linginfelter-TPI camshaft pulls 17" vacuum solid. N/A runs 10.9 @124, Crack-runs 10.3 @135... haven't run at track since Oct-99
Old 02-03-2001, 07:59 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
'67stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd have to say a Holly 4160 or was it the 4150?

Anyhow I'd go with a holly 750 vacuum secondaries not a double pumper and modifiy it as much as you can to get more air in it. The double pumpers aren't as fuel effecient. I think there was an article on motortecmag.com that said how to get more air into em. Performance carbs can be 1000 CFM. cfm is just the measure of air introduced you can always mess with the jets on any carb. Also just for your info q-jets can be modified to about 1000cfm, don't ask me how though. Why do you think the performance carbs like dominators are 1000cfm cause for a 400HP engine it doesn't sacrifice top end HP or bottom end torque/HP. But why don't you just port a 350TPI manifold and have a custom chip burnt or learn to burn em? Carbs just don't stay tuned like TPI or TBI. Unless you really know your stuff when it comes to carbs I'd say stay away or start reading. Also if you do go with a carb I'd say get an O2 sensor and gauge so you know when it's tuned and your not reading spark plugs and playin the guessing game, but you have to use sensor safe gasket sealent.
Old 02-04-2001, 12:40 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Fast-Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Commiskey,In.,U.S.
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 750cfm Holly is way to big a carb. for his combo. He's only useing a Edelbrock Performer
not a Per.RPM,If HOLLY is the way he's going to go 600cfm is plenty big enough.
Old 02-04-2001, 07:24 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
The ODB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Belleville, IL USA
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Man! you guys are hurting my feelings here. I was convinced that I had sparkplug reading down to a science.

Anyway I say the 750 cfms is not too big for a 350, 327, or 305. I just have a grudge against Holley carbs.
As much as Holley has rode the wave of racing performance, I feel they have also given carburetors a bad name, because they are a bit too complicated to fine tune for the average street enthusiast. So I don't like Holleys.
But for the record, you should have great luck by staying in the 600 cfm range no matter which brand you go with.
good luck again,


------------------
White 1986 Irocz, 305/383 with Edlebrock Performer-RPM intake and Performer #1407 carburetor, +110hp shot of crack, 700R-4 tranny, 3.25:1 rear, Mcreary Road-Stars, single 3" Borla exhaust, Linginfelter-TPI camshaft pulls 17" vacuum solid. N/A runs 10.9 @124, Crack-runs 10.3 @135... haven't run at track since Oct-99
Old 02-09-2001, 03:12 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Mr. TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: San Jose, Ca.
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didnt know that! I thought I could just throw in an edelbrock performer carb and have no problems, I didn't know I had to replace the distributor. So if I have to replace the dist. will that mean the computer is no more? or how does that work?....Also what will happen if I dont replace the dist.? Thanks for any comments or suggestions

------------------
1986 Pontiac TA 305 carbuerated.
Old 02-09-2001, 02:44 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
The ODB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Belleville, IL USA
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you go to non-CC carb then you should go to non-CC distributor. If you fool a couple of sensors then the CC-distributor would work enough to drive the car... but definately not the way to go for performance.
A non-CC distributor will give you total control of the timing.
If you trash the computer, just have a tranny shop install a pressure switch to ensure TC-lockup.
ODB




------------------
*I do custom performance mods on Edlebrock Performer carburetors (dualplane intake mods in the works),
White 1986 Irocz, 305 with iron #416 heads,
383 with aluminum TFS heads,
Edlebrock Performer-RPM intake and Performer #1407 carburetor, +110hp shot of crack, 700R-4 tranny, Vigilante 2400 lockup converter, 3.25:1 Ford 9" rear, Mcreary Road-Stars, SLP-stainless 1.75" shortie headers & Y-pipe, single 3" Borla exhaust, Linginfelter-TPI camshaft part number 74216 pulls 17" vacuum solid. Cam specs 213/219 @.050 114-LSA, sometimes advertised at 216/219 @.050 112-LSA .462/.470 lift @1.5:1 ratio. Using Harland Sharp 1.65:1 roller rockers. MSD-6AL, billet distributor, multi-retard, blaster-3 coil, and RPM switch. SouthSide machine subframe connectors, SSM lift-bars, Moroso 4" underdrive crank pulley.

N/A runs 10.9 @124,
Crack-runs 10.3 @135
haven't run at track since Oct-99
Old 02-10-2001, 12:21 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
burnoutrpm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: outerspace(maybe..pluto)?
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
600 edlebrock thats the only true fix, q-junks are crap!

------------------
1989 firebird formula

Mods: converted from T.B.I. to a carburator 305 to a 350. Flowmater exhaust,hedman shortie hedders,202 160 (882) heads,.447/.447 lift 222@.050 duration speed pro 327/350hp cam 350 .40 over (356) Edlebrock torker2 and a 600 edlebrock manual choke (1405)

Future mods performer rpm air gap intake (polished) comp roller cam, and way better headsa 400 defintely in the works!
Old 02-12-2001, 12:42 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
84TransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr TA: Looks like you and I are in the same boat. Getting a Holley 80457, and a vacuum controlled distributor. At work the other day i did some research and found this: All police cars from 1983-1993 that had carbs also had vacuum controlled distributors. And that 305 distributors are interchangeable with 350's. Any auto parts store will have one of these distributors in stock, thus avoiding a high price for a new performance one from Jeg's or Summit.

I feel I am fairly clueless on this swap. When all the parts get here by Friday, looks like i'll be having some fun, if you can call it that. Hopefully [with how slow i am] it will be back up Wedsneday.

------------------
--Steve S--
1984 Trans Am 305 LG4, 5 speed
Daily Driver, Flowmaster 80 Series
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
25
09-25-2021 07:55 PM
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
jrdturbo
Firebirds for Sale
26
03-31-2016 02:58 PM
armybyrd
Carburetors
3
10-20-2015 03:57 AM
SRKLEGIN
Interior Parts Wanted
5
10-12-2015 07:28 AM



Quick Reply: Edeldbrock q-jets VS a PERFORMER



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 PM.