Can someone tell me the jet + rod sizes for a 17085432?
#1
Can someone tell me the jet + rod sizes for a 17085432?
I dont know where to get this info.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=us
found this part reference number
JET and ROD PACKAGE, Metering 4342840 4342847 4342847
I pulled it apart and found the primary rods are 55M and the jets were marked 71, but one of the jets was drilled out to 76.
It would make sense perhaps then the jets might ought to both be 73 since it ran pretty good on the engine.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=us
found this part reference number
JET and ROD PACKAGE, Metering 4342840 4342847 4342847
I pulled it apart and found the primary rods are 55M and the jets were marked 71, but one of the jets was drilled out to 76.
It would make sense perhaps then the jets might ought to both be 73 since it ran pretty good on the engine.
Last edited by sdowney717; 10-26-2010 at 03:08 PM.
#2
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Carrollton Texas.
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 mild build up
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: Can someone tell me the jet + rod sizes for a 17085432?
I dont know where to get this info.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=us
found this part reference number
JET and ROD PACKAGE, Metering 4342840 4342847 4342847
I pulled it apart and found the primary rods are 55M and the jets were marked 71, but one of the jets was drilled out to 76.
It would make sense perhaps then the jets might ought to both be 73 since it ran pretty good on the engine.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...&ct=clnk&gl=us
found this part reference number
JET and ROD PACKAGE, Metering 4342840 4342847 4342847
I pulled it apart and found the primary rods are 55M and the jets were marked 71, but one of the jets was drilled out to 76.
It would make sense perhaps then the jets might ought to both be 73 since it ran pretty good on the engine.
I did find this:
jets are contained in the primaarry and secondary circuits, one
for each barrel. Early CS units had press-in jets retained by o-rings. CS
and 71 TQs have the primary jets in the upper bowl cover. All other
TQs have screw-in primary jets in the main body. All TQs have the
secondary jets mounted in the upper bowl cover. All jets have a part number
prefix of 120-. 72 and later TQs usually have the part suffix stamped
on the jet, primaries: 4XXX, secondaries: 5XXX (or 120-5XXX). The XXX
denotes the size, example: 4098 = 0.098", 5137 = 0.137". CS and 71 TQs
have part number suffixes of 3XX or 3XXX.
I think this might help you find the right jets for it.
#3
Re: Can someone tell me the jet + rod sizes for a 17085432?
it is definitely a quadrajet. It is going on a 392, not a 350 or a Dodge 360. It also has the large main air bleeds in the air horn.
Anyhow, I jetted them both to 73, left the rods at 55M.
idle needles had to be turned out 5 turns.
APT is at 5 turns up from bottom
no nozzle drip
runs alright, maybe a little lean.
I need to run it a while and then look at the plug colors.
What exacly is the affects of the larger main air bleeds versus the smaller main air bleeds on these m4m series carbs? Would there be any advantage to soldering the main air bleeds up and redrilling smaller? I think it might improve the idle circuit. Main air bleeds if smaller means less air mixing with the fuel, therefore a richer mixture, easier to pull fuel vacuum action type of idea, I THINK.
I have a 17080213 which has smaller main air bleeds. I think it idles better.
That one is jetted at 73, has 49M rods, idle screws turned out 1.5 turns and APT is out 1.5 turns, really just barely touching the metering piston pin.
Anyhow, I jetted them both to 73, left the rods at 55M.
idle needles had to be turned out 5 turns.
APT is at 5 turns up from bottom
no nozzle drip
runs alright, maybe a little lean.
I need to run it a while and then look at the plug colors.
What exacly is the affects of the larger main air bleeds versus the smaller main air bleeds on these m4m series carbs? Would there be any advantage to soldering the main air bleeds up and redrilling smaller? I think it might improve the idle circuit. Main air bleeds if smaller means less air mixing with the fuel, therefore a richer mixture, easier to pull fuel vacuum action type of idea, I THINK.
I have a 17080213 which has smaller main air bleeds. I think it idles better.
That one is jetted at 73, has 49M rods, idle screws turned out 1.5 turns and APT is out 1.5 turns, really just barely touching the metering piston pin.
Last edited by sdowney717; 10-27-2010 at 09:06 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TOMcat GTA
Suspension and Chassis
12
09-15-2015 09:31 AM
1Aauto
Sponsored Vendors
0
09-02-2015 01:35 PM