RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Hanover PA
Posts: 530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
TrueBlue sent me a piece of RAAMmat to compare to my Dynamat Extreme.
NOTE: ALL I SAY, ARE JUST OBSERVATIONS, I DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MATERIAL TO ACTUALLY DO A SIDE BY SIDE INSTALL TO TEST EACH MATERIALS EFFECTIVENESS!!
First off, the products are not identical like some claim.
Dynamat has a much thicker aluminum layer. The Dynamat is harder to install due to the thicker aluminum. You really have to push it and use a roller or other tool to get in small areas.
RAAMmat's aluminum layer is much thinner, almost soft. As a result, easier to install, but seems less effective.
As far as the sitcky stuff, Dynamat is thicker, and seems to be a tad stickier.
Don't get me wrong, RAAMmat seems to be a good product, and is worlds beyond any other dynamat. From looks, it seems like 2 layers of raammat will do the job of 1 layer of dynamat extreme. Doubled up, it may even be slightly more effective.
Price no object ? I choose Dynamat.
But price is an object.
RAAMmat is like $70 for 50 sq ft. Cost per sq ft = $1.40
Dynamat Extreme "RETAIL" is about $200 per 36 sq ft. Cost per sq ft = $5.50
Dynamat Extreme can be had for $150 per 36 sq ft easily on the net. Cost per sq ft = $4.16
Price / performance ? Definately RAAMmat. In fact, you can double up, get the performace of dynamat, and still be cheaper. For almost the same price as Dyn. Extreme off the net ($4.16 / sq ft), you can triple layer the RAAMmat, which I have no doubt will out do Dyn. Extreme.
There you have it!
mike
NOTE: ALL I SAY, ARE JUST OBSERVATIONS, I DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MATERIAL TO ACTUALLY DO A SIDE BY SIDE INSTALL TO TEST EACH MATERIALS EFFECTIVENESS!!
First off, the products are not identical like some claim.
Dynamat has a much thicker aluminum layer. The Dynamat is harder to install due to the thicker aluminum. You really have to push it and use a roller or other tool to get in small areas.
RAAMmat's aluminum layer is much thinner, almost soft. As a result, easier to install, but seems less effective.
As far as the sitcky stuff, Dynamat is thicker, and seems to be a tad stickier.
Don't get me wrong, RAAMmat seems to be a good product, and is worlds beyond any other dynamat. From looks, it seems like 2 layers of raammat will do the job of 1 layer of dynamat extreme. Doubled up, it may even be slightly more effective.
Price no object ? I choose Dynamat.
But price is an object.
RAAMmat is like $70 for 50 sq ft. Cost per sq ft = $1.40
Dynamat Extreme "RETAIL" is about $200 per 36 sq ft. Cost per sq ft = $5.50
Dynamat Extreme can be had for $150 per 36 sq ft easily on the net. Cost per sq ft = $4.16
Price / performance ? Definately RAAMmat. In fact, you can double up, get the performace of dynamat, and still be cheaper. For almost the same price as Dyn. Extreme off the net ($4.16 / sq ft), you can triple layer the RAAMmat, which I have no doubt will out do Dyn. Extreme.
There you have it!
mike
#3
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good to hear that the stuff arrived, I wasn't sure if customs would have some issues with my sending a weird piece of sticky foil over the boarder in an envelope. My piece hasn't arrived yet.
The test results surprise me a bit. The RAAMmat guy advertises that his material is 45 mils thick compared to Dynamat Extreme's 44 mils. I want to go back and check that for sure, though. Maybe he meant regular dynamat, but I don't think so because (if I remember correctly) he was making most of his comparison statements with regards to how it stacked up against Dynamat Extreme.
Regardless, thanks for the analysis, DJ. I really appreciate the effort. And if anyone's gonna be able to give a knowledgable, objective opinion on sound deadening material, it's going be the guy who's already decked out the entire interior of his car with the stuff!
Anyway, it's better to find out now 'cause I haven't started doing my car yet. I don't think I can afford to double up on every area, but I'll certainly be paying more attention to the important spots.
The test results surprise me a bit. The RAAMmat guy advertises that his material is 45 mils thick compared to Dynamat Extreme's 44 mils. I want to go back and check that for sure, though. Maybe he meant regular dynamat, but I don't think so because (if I remember correctly) he was making most of his comparison statements with regards to how it stacked up against Dynamat Extreme.
Regardless, thanks for the analysis, DJ. I really appreciate the effort. And if anyone's gonna be able to give a knowledgable, objective opinion on sound deadening material, it's going be the guy who's already decked out the entire interior of his car with the stuff!
Anyway, it's better to find out now 'cause I haven't started doing my car yet. I don't think I can afford to double up on every area, but I'll certainly be paying more attention to the important spots.
#4
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh yeah, 87transam5.7tpi:
If you're interested in getting RAAMmat, you can e-mail the guy who sells it (Rick) at raam@raamaudio.com
If you're interested in getting RAAMmat, you can e-mail the guy who sells it (Rick) at raam@raamaudio.com
#6
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, it doesn't look like I'm getting any Dynamat Extreme in the mail otherwise it would've probably arrived by now (z28racer??) I'm glad you posted such a thorough comparison, DJ. I can live vicariously through you
Trending Topics
#8
might benefit you to look into something called ice gaurd as well for your horizontal surfaces of the vehicle. this is used in roofing and will do exactly the same as dynamat will, at a fraction of the cost. 60 dollars for 2 10x10 squares. Like i said though, it is best used on flat surfaces because after time, it tends to come off of vertical panels.
you can get it at home depot or lowes.
for 60 dollars i deadened both of my cars, it was well worth it.
you can get it at home depot or lowes.
for 60 dollars i deadened both of my cars, it was well worth it.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '91 Firebird
45mm thick? That's nearly 2 inches. How do you get away with putting that underneath the carpet, that seems like a lot.
Anyway, I really need to soundproof my car too. The only thing I need to know is though, when doing so should I stick the soundproofing (let's say in the trunk area) to the inside of the body panels, or to the inside of the plastic interior panels, or both?
Anyway, I really need to soundproof my car too. The only thing I need to know is though, when doing so should I stick the soundproofing (let's say in the trunk area) to the inside of the body panels, or to the inside of the plastic interior panels, or both?
#10
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, TEXAS
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2x1991 & 2000 Camaros
Engine: 350, 305 & LS1
Transmission: TH-700R4 and 4l60E
Originally posted by Faded
45mm thick? That's nearly 2 inches. How do you get away with putting that underneath the carpet, that seems like a lot.
Anyway, I really need to soundproof my car too. The only thing I need to know is though, when doing so should I stick the soundproofing (let's say in the trunk area) to the inside of the body panels, or to the inside of the plastic interior panels, or both?
45mm thick? That's nearly 2 inches. How do you get away with putting that underneath the carpet, that seems like a lot.
Anyway, I really need to soundproof my car too. The only thing I need to know is though, when doing so should I stick the soundproofing (let's say in the trunk area) to the inside of the body panels, or to the inside of the plastic interior panels, or both?
1mm=.1mils
Basically 1/10 of a mm
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seven Springs, NC
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: Auto
#13
Saw that my site was accessed through this thread so I wanted to drop in.
the Quote
Dynamat is thicker, and seems to be a tad stickier.
is not true. dynamat is 44 mils thick, where as rammat is 45 mils this. dynamat extreme might feel thicker because of the aluminum but it is not. it is actually thinner.
I used plenty of rammat before I started Second Skin. it is a good product and is hard to beat.
especially Rammat 60.
sorry to barge in here, but if anyone has any questions about dound amping, let me know. I am always happy to hellp. its what I do for a living.
ANT
the Quote
Dynamat is thicker, and seems to be a tad stickier.
is not true. dynamat is 44 mils thick, where as rammat is 45 mils this. dynamat extreme might feel thicker because of the aluminum but it is not. it is actually thinner.
I used plenty of rammat before I started Second Skin. it is a good product and is hard to beat.
especially Rammat 60.
sorry to barge in here, but if anyone has any questions about dound amping, let me know. I am always happy to hellp. its what I do for a living.
ANT
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 1,407
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 82z28
Engine: 406
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Yeah, hes a good guy i'll vouch for him. definately knows what he's talking about..yeah ANT im the same blyth from splbassX small world eh?
#15
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You have to remember that this test was quite an old one when you consider the development of RAAMmat. The comparison piece was a piece of original RAAMmat, and there have been at least two versions since then. The latest (the aforementioned V60) is a LOT better than the original... noticably thicker and much higher quality and it must compare a lot better to the Dynamat Extreme (while being only $20 more per roll than the original).
That said, I'm a big RAAMmat supporter. I've used the stuff religiously for a couple of years now with great results.
That said, I'm a big RAAMmat supporter. I've used the stuff religiously for a couple of years now with great results.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92 Formula
Engine: L98
Transmission: A4
wow... this was a really old thread...
I saw a post from DJ and said... what tha'....
So there is new Raamat? I am looking to deaden the 99z....
How much would this cost me... (About how many cu ft?) (floorboards, hatch area, rear quarters...)
Thanks,
I saw a post from DJ and said... what tha'....
So there is new Raamat? I am looking to deaden the 99z....
How much would this cost me... (About how many cu ft?) (floorboards, hatch area, rear quarters...)
Thanks,
#18
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll tell you the same thing Rick told me: minimum two rolls, probably three to be safe and sure. I'm doubling up in various areas so I needed three for sure. RAAMmat v60 is going for $79 per 62.5 sq.ft. roll right now on Ebay and there's also the option of getting his b-stock matting for $59 per if it's still available.
#19
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
WHAT!!!!! If 1mm was really equal to 0.1mils, that would mean it would take 450mm (roughly 17.7") inches to equal 45mils... (you were closer when you said 1/10 of a mm, but you were still off by four times)
1mil is 1/1000th of an inch. (0.001") That means it (45mils) would take 22 layers to be one (1) inch thick!!!!!!!
HAHA... Leave it to you Camaro guys to be driving around with almost 18" of sound deadener in your cars!!!! (52" if you use the triple Raammat method as the one guy suggests...)
Sorry, I shouldn't pick on you guys, I was only doing a search for Dynamat Xtreme and I came across this forum... I just couldn't resist... And just my luck, this is probably a dead link so none of you will get to see it....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Last edited by y2kpony; 05-15-2007 at 09:04 PM.
#20
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 350 TPI
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
WHAT!!!!! If 1mm was really equal to 0.1mils, that would mean it would take 450mm (roughly 17.7") inches to equal 45mils... (you were closer when you said 1/10 of a mm, but you were still off by four times)
1mil is 1/1000th of an inch. (0.001") That means it (45mils) would take 22 layers to be one (1) inch thick!!!!!!!
HAHA... Leave it to you Camaro guys to be driving around with almost 18" of sound deadener in your cars!!!! (52" if you use the triple Raammat method as the one guy suggests...)
Sorry, I shouldn't pick on you guys, I was only doing a search for Dynamat Xtreme and I came across this forum... I just couldn't resist... And just my luck, this is probably a dead link so none of you will get to see it....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
1mil is 1/1000th of an inch. (0.001") That means it (45mils) would take 22 layers to be one (1) inch thick!!!!!!!
HAHA... Leave it to you Camaro guys to be driving around with almost 18" of sound deadener in your cars!!!! (52" if you use the triple Raammat method as the one guy suggests...)
Sorry, I shouldn't pick on you guys, I was only doing a search for Dynamat Xtreme and I came across this forum... I just couldn't resist... And just my luck, this is probably a dead link so none of you will get to see it....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Make yourself look stupid
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
and you just took time to bash i guy who already bought a mustang. his troubles are numerous already lol. :-)
#22
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
And by the way, RC83, no troubles to worry about... 160k miles on a 2000 GT, I will drive it until I trade it in for an '09 when the next update comes out... No rush though, still runs great, but thank you for your concern.
Last edited by y2kpony; 05-16-2007 at 12:42 PM.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: TBD
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
HECKSATIN.... HAHAHA... I was just teasing, but I didn't call anyone names... But you had to be a jerk and call me a moron... Hey, I said it was an old thread, you're the one who made yourself look stupid by repeating what I already said.
And by the way, RC83, no troubles to worry about... 160k miles on a 2000 GT, I will drive it until I trade it in for an '09 when the next update comes out... No rush though, still runs great, but thank you for your concern.
And by the way, RC83, no troubles to worry about... 160k miles on a 2000 GT, I will drive it until I trade it in for an '09 when the next update comes out... No rush though, still runs great, but thank you for your concern.
#24
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
Actually, I am hoping the Camaro and the Challenger are both out by the time the new Mustang hits the dealer's floors in '09 (or late '08, if I'm lucky)... Maybe with that much competition in the sales department, the dealers will have a tougher time gouging the buyers (good for you guys too)... Almost thought about buying an '05 GT (in '04), but some dealers thought they could even mark up the V6's! I like Mustangs and all, but $2000 over sticker for a V6 (and even more for a GT)??? They have got to be kidding, although at that time there was no competition in that class.
I won't buy a V8 until I can buy it for fleet pricing.
I won't buy a V8 until I can buy it for fleet pricing.
#25
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Boot(New Orleans) Louisiana
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Irocz28/04 GMC Yukon
Engine: Ram Jet 350(*TPI*)
Transmission: Turbo 400 w/1500 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: RAAMmat -vs- Dynamat Extreme
I owned a mustang 4 1 month. it was a 2000 sc cobra. it was ok but not as fast as my iroc. so i sold it for $2000.00 to my lil sister it had 125k on the tach!
i paid $1500.00 for it , it was wrecked in the front and back. so i got it fixed cheap from our painters.they fixed and painted it for $750.00. the still had a clean title come to find out the car was repoed and thats how it looked when they pulled it out the drive way and the person only owed 2 payments of $365.00. so i got a good deal. i was @ the auction the other day and they had a mach1 going 4 13000.00 with 86k on it so i got lucky with that cobra.
i paid $1500.00 for it , it was wrecked in the front and back. so i got it fixed cheap from our painters.they fixed and painted it for $750.00. the still had a clean title come to find out the car was repoed and thats how it looked when they pulled it out the drive way and the person only owed 2 payments of $365.00. so i got a good deal. i was @ the auction the other day and they had a mach1 going 4 13000.00 with 86k on it so i got lucky with that cobra.
Last edited by RocsRose86; 05-16-2007 at 03:26 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gixxer92
Engine Swap
33
04-12-2022 12:09 AM