Brakes Looking to upgrade or get the most out of what you have stock? All brake discussions go here!

Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-2009, 04:21 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
drperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 firebird
Engine: 1995 lt1 383
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: moser 9" with 3.70
Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

I am in the process of trying to get more rear braking after installing Ford explorer rear disks with a Moser 9" rear end. This is a drag car that I foot brake off the line and I want more holding power to stall it up higher. My car was a disk/drum car so I replaced the proportioning valve with a disk/disk from a 92 but it still does not seem to hold the rears on jack stands above 1200 rpm.

After reading many posts I found that many of people have probles with rear brakes and the remove the valve/spring from the front of the proportioning valve (combination valve). From my understanding though this could create an issue with the delay valve in the rear on the proportioning valve on the front brakes.

So has anyone ever totally gutted the proportioning valve, front and rear? I am thinking that I should remove both and place a adjustable Wilwood valve to the rears.

Thanks
Old 10-31-2009, 05:23 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,666
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 48 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

i did.

i gutted the entire valve then cut the front section off for the rear brake lines. So i only have the rear part that the front lines attach to. I had a friend weld up all the extra holes so now its just a "t" fitting or sorts. Then i plumbed in an adjustable valve for the rears. Dont have a pic, but i can get one.
Old 10-31-2009, 06:56 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
drperformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 firebird
Engine: 1995 lt1 383
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: moser 9" with 3.70
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

I am thinking that I am going to weld the holes closed on the two factory bolts (front and rear) after I gut it to keep it sealed. Still run the front and rear lines from the proportioning valve but add a adjustable valve right under it on the rear line.
Old 11-23-2009, 08:07 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
AlexM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

Is this working for you?
Old 11-23-2009, 08:14 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,666
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 48 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

yup
Old 12-01-2009, 10:27 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
ShMaCk2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

what would happen if i just got rid of the proportioning valve completely and disconnected the rear brakes and used a t-fitting for the fronts? would it still stop fine?
Old 12-01-2009, 10:56 AM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

Originally Posted by ShMaCk2004
what would happen if i just got rid of the proportioning valve completely and disconnected the rear brakes and used a t-fitting for the fronts? would it still stop fine?
If your suggesting not having rear brakes at all, only the fronts....It'll stop, eventually! Just not very quick & you'll generate a little extra padding under you (in your pants!).

I had my rear brakes go out & had to get home. Talk about PLANNING your stops. SCARY!
Old 12-01-2009, 11:29 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
ShMaCk2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

Originally Posted by Stephen
If your suggesting not having rear brakes at all, only the fronts....It'll stop, eventually! Just not very quick & you'll generate a little extra padding under you (in your pants!).

I had my rear brakes go out & had to get home. Talk about PLANNING your stops. SCARY!
Really that bad even tho only 10% of the braking is done in the rear? Are you sure you were not leaking fluid?
Old 12-01-2009, 12:17 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

Originally Posted by ShMaCk2004
Really that bad even tho only 10% of the braking is done in the rear? Are you sure you were not leaking fluid?
The rear brake portion of my master was empty, so yeah...Leaked fluid.

But the front half was full & good, didn't leak any. It would EASILY lock up the fronts. NO rear brake assist at all.

I think only 10% is a big mis-judgment.
Old 12-01-2009, 05:21 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
y84pauloflondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London, Ont, Canada
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 T-Top GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

I could be wrong, but isn't the ideal braking ratio something like 70% Front and 30% rear!!!
Old 12-01-2009, 05:24 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
y84pauloflondon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London, Ont, Canada
Posts: 833
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 T-Top GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

I have been considering changing the current Dot 3 brake fluid to Dot 4 brake fluid. Dot 4 brake fluid should last longer and perform better in our cars!!!!
Old 12-01-2009, 07:09 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,666
Likes: 0
Received 50 Likes on 48 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

Originally Posted by ShMaCk2004
Really that bad even tho only 10% of the braking is done in the rear? Are you sure you were not leaking fluid?
no, rear does more than that. This is a really bad idea.
Old 12-02-2009, 03:33 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
ShMaCk2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: LS1
Transmission: LS1 T56
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73
Re: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve

ok it was just an idea anyway
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
06-20-2024 07:21 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
09-13-2015 11:35 PM
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
0
09-02-2015 07:28 PM



Quick Reply: Anyone ever totally gut the proportioning valve



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.