Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

Why does GM no "makey"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2011 | 05:03 AM
  #1  
ThePain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 13
From: Alaska
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic
Why does GM no "makey"?

Specifically.... The front ground effects for our cars. After my accident, my bodyman could only find the front bumper cover new, the front GFX were apparently discontinued...

The question is why??? This might be one of the most vulnerable, most abused, most hardest to find body parts of them all. I've read here that they seem to be semi rare, so why would GM be so quick to throw us to the junkyard wolves?

I know our newest car is at least 19 years, but it seems hard to believe that certain parts like this wouldn't still be profitable. At the very least it would be nice if they'd have sold the equipment to an aftermarket supplier so we could get OEM speced Reproductions!

Why Gm, Why?????
Old 04-19-2011 | 08:24 AM
  #2  
WILL85IROC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 952
Likes: 5
From: PITTSBURGH, PA
Car: 85 IROC-Z Z-28, BLUE & SILVER
Engine: 5.7L & 5.0L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: FACTORY
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

did u try yearone.com, classicindustries.com, rickscamaro, etc ??? ive seen em in there...
Old 04-19-2011 | 08:26 AM
  #3  
EvilCartman's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Answer, "I know our newest car is at least 19 years"...
Old 04-19-2011 | 09:11 AM
  #4  
camaronewbie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 17
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

I believe the nose cones are all pretty much the same through all years - so they produced alot of them. But you have a 1992 car - only the 1991 and 1992 cars had that chin spoiler, so not as many were ever made.

Think about it - if you manufactured an item, would you stockpile all the parts required for that item in enough quantity to last 20 years AFTER it's last production date? How much money would it cost to store an extra 10,000 chin spoilers for 20 years? You kind of answered your own question - it's the most torn up part on the car - they've all been used up years ago.

Hawks used to carry them new and used. Thirdgen Ranch is a good source to check. Also ebay, and the classifieds here.
Old 04-19-2011 | 09:46 AM
  #5  
Convoy25's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, New Jersey
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

yeah i believe GM stops holding onto parts for a car 10 years after it was made
Old 04-19-2011 | 10:19 AM
  #6  
puma1552's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 25
From: Minneapolis
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

It's kind of retarded that they produce bumper covers and parking lenses, but not the chin spoiler. You could say they didn't make many '91-'92s, but they sure made a lot of '85-'90 models.
Old 04-19-2011 | 10:42 AM
  #7  
rob2000gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Tallahasse Fl
Car: 91 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Tpi 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Instead of stock piling enough for the next 20 years they should have kept the tooling so they can make them when the run low I feel the dealer should never have a discontinued item they are the ones that designed and built the car originaly tooling is very expensive so why throw it away
Old 04-19-2011 | 10:43 AM
  #8  
Convoy25's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, New Jersey
Car: 95 Z85 S10, 99 Formula
Engine: 4.3 CPI , LS1
Transmission: NV3500, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

yeah or at least sell all of their tools.molds etc to a company that could remake them
Old 04-19-2011 | 11:09 AM
  #9  
nosajwols's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 262
Likes: 5
From: Toronto
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350 for now
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Maybe they produced the same number of chin spoilers that they did bumper covers and because the chin spoilers get damaged more they ran out many moons ago.... but still have bumper covers sitting around.
Old 04-19-2011 | 01:50 PM
  #10  
Thirdgen Ranch's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 823
Likes: 1
From: Crete, IL
Car: Too many
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Originally Posted by rob2000gt
Instead of stock piling enough for the next 20 years they should have kept the tooling so they can make them when the run low I feel the dealer should never have a discontinued item they are the ones that designed and built the car originaly tooling is very expensive so why throw it away
You need to understand how the auto industry works. It's very unlikely this piece was ever manufactured by GM. Instead, it was made by a GM supplier. That supplier would have been under contract to produce the parts for a certain amount of time. These suppliers generally deal in large volume products and it wouldn't be cost effective to keep tooling around just to run a small amount of these from time to time. It's also possible that the supplier owed the molds and not GM.

Instead, GM is likely to sell the rights to the product at some point and they will be reproduced by some other company. Unfortunately, reproduction parts are rarely the same quality of originals and can actually be VERY inferior. In many, if not most, cases you are far better of with a used original than a new reproduction.
Old 04-19-2011 | 02:15 PM
  #11  
camaronewbie's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,192
Likes: 17
From: Cary, North Carolina
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Originally Posted by rob2000gt
I feel the dealer should never have a discontinued item they are the ones that designed and built the car originaly
Dealer doesn't make the car, they sell the car. Dealers are independant companies, and have no affiliation with GM other than a license to sell GM products. They are not required to carry any car parts at all for any car, ever. Granted, their customer service rating would drop to a point where they'd lose their dealership, but there's no requirement for a dealer to stock any part.

Dealers rarely keep anything on hand. You could put all the parts from a dealer parts dept into your living room - most of it is oil and filters, a few generic electrical connectors, and plugs. 90% of the time, when you take your car to the dealer, you get Advance Auto parts installed. Haven't you ever noticed the huge number of Advance Auto trucks/cars on the road? Advance employs 3 times as many drivers per store than they do counter people. And starting soon - that number of drivers will double - Advance will start delivering to YOUR door with a $75 minimum purchase.

The parts that Advance doesn't carry (GM specific), are located in warehouses throughout the country - usually 1-2 days shipping distance.

Like mentioned, parts are made by contracted suppliers. Those companies are going to make a minimum number of parts per day, otherwise it's not worth THEIR time and investment. If GM won't pay for that number per day, then the supplier cancels the contract. These suppliers are given the contract and the specs of the part - the suppliers create the machines, tooling, etc. to make the part as efficiently as possible, so that they can in turn recoup their investment in the tooling. GM doesn't even pay out the initial investment money to start producing a car, these suppliers all do!

Thus it's GM "discontinuing" the parts by not being able to sell enough of a particular part to justify paying the supplier to keep making it.
Old 04-19-2011 | 04:09 PM
  #12  
GTAwheelman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: East Central IL
Car: 1985 Sport Coupe
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Originally Posted by Thirdgen Ranch
You need to understand how the auto industry works. It's very unlikely this piece was ever manufactured by GM. Instead, it was made by a GM supplier. That supplier would have been under contract to produce the parts for a certain amount of time. These suppliers generally deal in large volume products and it wouldn't be cost effective to keep tooling around just to run a small amount of these from time to time. It's also possible that the supplier owed the molds and not GM.

Instead, GM is likely to sell the rights to the product at some point and they will be reproduced by some other company. Unfortunately, reproduction parts are rarely the same quality of originals and can actually be VERY inferior. In many, if not most, cases you are far better of with a used original than a new reproduction.
Pretty much this except one thing. GM usually owns their tooling, molds, and assembly line equipment even though a supplier uses it.
Old 04-19-2011 | 08:13 PM
  #13  
rob2000gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Tallahasse Fl
Car: 91 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Tpi 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

And they usually dont sell the tooling which is completly retarded because they could get some of the costs of making the tooling back out selling it
Old 04-20-2011 | 04:00 AM
  #14  
ThePain's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 13
From: Alaska
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Wow, this turned into a very interesting read. Thank you third gen community

And again, I second or third, or fourthed? The notion, why, WHY can't they sell the tooling to third parties instead of throwing it away or recycling it?

Can you imagine how great the world would be if Hawks thirdgen got it's hands on all of GM's old toolings
Old 04-20-2011 | 04:25 AM
  #15  
drknow90rs_ss@y's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 61
From: Wittman,Az
Car: 86 IROC-Z, '71 RS
Engine: 305 TPI/ 350
Transmission: 700R4/TH350
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

In the past, tooling, along with licensing have been sold, but tooling also wears out and for molded parts, even the master mold wears out.
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:31 AM
  #16  
Andre#4's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: wouldn't you like to know?
Car: tta drophead coupe, 91 form 1LE
Engine: lc2, lb9
Transmission: 2004r, mm5
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 3.45
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

consider yourself lucky if you have a camaro. To be able to get a front bumper cover new is incredible. For trans ams and firebirds, these have been unavailable for at least 12 years. And used ones are crap. They get warped in the sun.

Now, gm makes most of their stuff in china. it is garbage. Worse than any repro stuff I have ever seen. I got some front parking light housings from gm last year. Unlike my originals, they have MADE IN CHINA
cast right into them, and black spray paint on them, with bugs and dirt in the paint, and overspray on the amber lense for the light. I would not put that chinese garbage on my car. And this is $50/each for these things. Total crap.

Basically, gm is buying repro parts from china, and putting them in their own boxes and selling it for premium prices under the heading:Genuine GM

This is no problem for them, because their new cars are such crap, that they can't justify making parts to a higher standard for old cars just because they were originally made to that standard. If they don't make quality stuff for their brand new cars, why do it for old ones? So we get crap. You are better off with used stuff in most circumstances. The chinese parking lamps will probably fill with water on the first rain, and then will turn cloudy after a month or two in the sun. The originals stay good for 20 years. I only bought them because I wanted spares and I thought if I could buy gm ones now, this was the time to do it since the cars are only getting older, and they will probably be discontinued soon. Little was I to know that these are just crap repros. Genuine GM crap. If I wanted that I would get a new GM car. The kind that go into the shop every 3 months for $1200 in repairs.
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:38 AM
  #17  
rob2000gt's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Tallahasse Fl
Car: 91 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Tpi 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

I am glad Hawks Third Gen started making the front ground effects for our 91 92 Firebirds but Genuine GM would have been better
Old 04-20-2011 | 06:52 AM
  #18  
Transmetal's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Car: 89 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg-Warner 3.27
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

I can't seem to find the front ground effects for a 85-90 ta that's still in good shape that doesn't cost an arm and a leg. I realized this is the reason I can't bolt on the side pieces of the front air dam. BTW I'd kill for a brand new set of black interior plastics.
Old 04-20-2011 | 08:54 AM
  #19  
GTAwheelman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: East Central IL
Car: 1985 Sport Coupe
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Originally Posted by Andre#4
consider yourself lucky if you have a camaro. To be able to get a front bumper cover new is incredible. For trans ams and firebirds, these have been unavailable for at least 12 years. And used ones are crap. They get warped in the sun.

Now, gm makes most of their stuff in china. it is garbage. Worse than any repro stuff I have ever seen. I got some front parking light housings from gm last year. Unlike my originals, they have MADE IN CHINA
cast right into them, and black spray paint on them, with bugs and dirt in the paint, and overspray on the amber lense for the light. I would not put that chinese garbage on my car. And this is $50/each for these things. Total crap.

Basically, gm is buying repro parts from china, and putting them in their own boxes and selling it for premium prices under the heading:Genuine GM

This is no problem for them, because their new cars are such crap, that they can't justify making parts to a higher standard for old cars just because they were originally made to that standard. If they don't make quality stuff for their brand new cars, why do it for old ones? So we get crap. You are better off with used stuff in most circumstances. The chinese parking lamps will probably fill with water on the first rain, and then will turn cloudy after a month or two in the sun. The originals stay good for 20 years. I only bought them because I wanted spares and I thought if I could buy gm ones now, this was the time to do it since the cars are only getting older, and they will probably be discontinued soon. Little was I to know that these are just crap repros. Genuine GM crap. If I wanted that I would get a new GM car. The kind that go into the shop every 3 months for $1200 in repairs.

where did you buy these?

BTW more then a few of GM's headlamps, fogs, and taillights are made in Illinois.

such as these which go on the Cadillac SRX. Which if you were to order a replacement there would be a good chance I would be the one to build the load that is shipped to GM's distributing center
Old 04-20-2011 | 09:03 AM
  #20  
lonestar7's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Round Rock, TX
Car: 1988 Firbird formula 350
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 Nine Bolt
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Is the chin spoiler for the Z28 and the IROC-Z the same? I see ground effects trim in good condition for the Z28 come up for sale often on Craigslist.
Old 04-20-2011 | 10:54 AM
  #21  
Thirdgen Ranch's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 823
Likes: 1
From: Crete, IL
Car: Too many
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Originally Posted by ThePain
Wow, this turned into a very interesting read. Thank you third gen community

And again, I second or third, or fourthed? The notion, why, WHY can't they sell the tooling to third parties instead of throwing it away or recycling it?

Can you imagine how great the world would be if Hawks thirdgen got it's hands on all of GM's old toolings
Sometimes the tooling and molds are worn out and need replacing anyway. Also, just having the tooling or molds isn't enough. You also need the equipment to make the parts which could easily be hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Old 04-20-2011 | 12:38 PM
  #22  
84redta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,983
Likes: 6
From: Stamford, New York
Car: 80 SE/TTA;88 T/A GTA;86 T/A
Engine: 4.9L Turbo; LT1; empty
Transmission: TH350; T56; empty
Axle/Gears: 3:23 disk; 4:10 disk ; 3.42 disk
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

If everyone is still looking for a good condition 91/92 one I got one sitting in a box ready to go, just PM me, but as far as tooling, as said above, every part is outsourced and brought together in the factory. They have pallets of stuff coming in and use it up as it comes, GM only really owns the chevy bow tie symbol and emblems and such, of which they own the right to use, but again, don't even produce themselves most of the time. Car manufacturers are nothing more than an assembly plant with a line of credit, and as they build the product, they pay off their suppliers.
Old 04-20-2011 | 11:21 PM
  #23  
drknow90rs_ss@y's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 61
From: Wittman,Az
Car: 86 IROC-Z, '71 RS
Engine: 305 TPI/ 350
Transmission: 700R4/TH350
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

Yep! What he said ^^^^^^^^^ The most advanced "In-house" (Meaning the largest percentage of the car is Fabbed in one factory) Is the camaro plant, where the 5thgen is built. They form the entire metalwork of the car in-house!
Old 04-21-2011 | 07:16 PM
  #24  
Maverick H1L's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,240
Likes: 6
From: LeRoy, NY
Car: 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT
Engine: 2.7L V6
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.41
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

... Because they don't have any brains in the upper level management...

I mean, come on. They've shut down plants and laid off/fired people left and right. There are an awful lot of cars out there that people want to keep running and rebuilding but can't because their cars are over 10 years old (believe it or not, I have a neighbor wanting to do some serious rust rebuilding on an 88 Cavalier!). The sensible solution would be to maybe start a Restoration division where they use a defunct plant and some of those laid off workers to produce parts according to GM specs. They have absolutely NO idea how much money they could rake in if they did so, taking away from the cheapo Chinese and Jap junk parts that don't fit and what not out there. Not to mention producing the impossibly difficult to find GTA door panels and the 91-92 Bird parts that most would at least like to have the option to buy...

I mean, really. I can't even find a full replacement quarter panel. I mean the full panel, from the roof union at the top of the door window line down to the welds at the rocker and the floor of the spare tire compartment. I don't want a skin as it has nowhere near enough steel for what I need (nothing in the rear where it joins the tail panel and no sail panel), so I'm stuck cutting one from a junkyard car (that has rust, but enough to manage compared to mine which the PO of my car FUBARed), because all that's available on the market is skins. I'd gladly pay for a FULL GM quarter panel, if I could find one! It might take me 6 months to get it, but I'd buy it!
Old 04-22-2011 | 04:23 AM
  #25  
lizzybenny's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Re: Why does GM no "makey"?

I agree what u siad.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.