Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

Any Structural Changes from 82 to 92

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2005, 11:18 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
91zzzeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 All Original
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Any Structural Changes from 82 to 92

Just wondering if GM made any changes/improvements to the unibody, sheetmetal , brackets , welds etc... from 82-92
You would think after 10 years the 92 would be a better made car( structure wise than the first model year). Anyone have any knowledge on this?
Old 09-06-2005, 11:32 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
kretos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: surrey b.c. canada
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
nothing done, added a wonderbar to the irocs, thats about it
Old 09-07-2005, 12:30 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dens71TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,125
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
92's were assembled with structural adhesive and additional spot welds to make the cars stiffer and less of a rattle trap. Too bad GM didn't do this earlier during the life of the 3rd-gen.

I've noticed a brace that runs from the passenger side hood hinge to the cowl and one from the drivers side battery tray to the top of the radiator support on later cars. My '84 T/A has neither of these features nor have I seen them on other early 3rd-gens.

Last edited by Dens71TA; 09-07-2005 at 12:33 AM.
Old 09-07-2005, 12:34 AM
  #4  
Member
 
ZROLimitRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe LT
Engine: 5.0 305 Code H
Transmission: 700R4
Dens71TA where 92's the only ones built that way?
Old 09-07-2005, 04:38 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dens71TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,125
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Originally posted by ZROLimitRacing
Dens71TA where 92's the only ones built that way?
As far as I know. I have an old magizine from around late 1991 that talks about the enhancments for 1992.
Old 09-07-2005, 07:27 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
TAdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: NJ,USA
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: GMPP 350 V8
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I can back Dens71 up on the 92 Adhesive usage. I have heard that before too.

Also the cowl-hinge support (there is another brace going from the pass. side shock tower to the frame rail) was used on Z28's, Irocs, and 91/92 TPI Pontiacs.
Old 09-07-2005, 10:30 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
CraZ-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: Can you say stroke?!?!
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
It was done on all the 91's and 92's. Some of the earlier years may have the "special" treatment when being assembled but the last 2 years are the best.

I'm also biased to.
Old 09-07-2005, 10:34 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
dennisbernal91z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: West Warwick RI, postal code: 02893
Posts: 4,349
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Car: Building LS3, T56 Z28
Engine: LS3
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser/ 4.11
yeah, my 91 had all those things before I took it appart. You guys think they are really worth it, to put them back. I have SFC now and a 6 point.

Old 09-07-2005, 02:18 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dens71TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,125
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
I just found the magazine. To quote:

"The Firebird line sees a number of small improvements for '92, the most notable of which lead to improved structural rigidity. Pontiac began using a new structural adhesive process midyear on '91s, which continues in '92. It essentially glues and then cooks body panels together. Improvements have been made in the spot-welding process, as well.

Rocker panels are now applied with adhesive glue too, in addition to being welded and riveted. Plastic clips also are used, all of which results in tighter door feel"


So it appears that some '91s also have the structural adhesive. All this info came from a Pontiac magazine but it also applies to Camaros.
Old 09-07-2005, 07:04 PM
  #10  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
91zzzeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28 All Original
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Dens71TA
I just found the magazine. To quote:

"The Firebird line sees a number of small improvements for '92, the most notable of which lead to improved structural rigidity. Pontiac began using a new structural adhesive process midyear on '91s, which continues in '92. It essentially glues and then cooks body panels together. Improvements have been made in the spot-welding process, as well.

Rocker panels are now applied with adhesive glue too, in addition to being welded and riveted. Plastic clips also are used, all of which results in tighter door feel"


So it appears that some '91s also have the structural adhesive. All this info came from a Pontiac magazine but it also applies to Camaros.
My 91 Z28 was made in 06/90 so I guess it did not get the adhesive.
I'm very surprised GM would spend the money to do this at the end of its model life unless this was a trial for the 4th gen.
Old 09-09-2005, 03:05 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
Xophertony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Or-eh-gun
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2012 Nissan Leaf
Engine: 80-kW AC synchronous electric motor
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: n/a
Originally posted by 91zzzeder
My 91 Z28 was made in 06/90 so I guess it did not get the adhesive.
I'm very surprised GM would spend the money to do this at the end of its model life unless this was a trial for the 4th gen.
ding ding. not only do they insult the third gen with an ugly follow up, they use us as guinne pigs. i feel violated
Old 09-09-2005, 12:05 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
tom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: So. Ohio
Posts: 2,287
Received 89 Likes on 81 Posts
Car: 88 Camaro
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Xophertony
ding ding. not only do they insult the third gen with an ugly follow up, they use us as guinne pigs. i feel violated
Agree 100% on that.
Old 09-13-2005, 07:14 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
JeremyNYR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 4.10 gears
I took a dash out of a 91 firebird and found that it had an additional bracket spot welded to the body to provide another spot for the dash assembly to bolt to. It's located near the corner of the dash right near where the small air vent is located. The 91 also had a bracket welded to the tranny tunnel that the radio pod bolted to. My 84 T/A doesn't have either of these but I wish it did.. my dash loves to rattle and move around.
Old 09-15-2005, 05:30 AM
  #14  
Member
 
ZROLimitRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe LT
Engine: 5.0 305 Code H
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by JeremyNYR
I took a dash out of a 91 firebird and found that it had an additional bracket spot welded to the body to provide another spot for the dash assembly to bolt to. It's located near the corner of the dash right near where the small air vent is located. The 91 also had a bracket welded to the tranny tunnel that the radio pod bolted to. My 84 T/A doesn't have either of these but I wish it did.. my dash loves to rattle and move around.
Ah the old "Bust A Move" dash huh.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abubaca
Auto Detailing and Appearance
18
11-05-2016 12:22 PM
91REDZ28VERT
Fabrication
12
09-03-2015 02:28 AM
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
2
08-22-2015 06:52 PM
transam84
Exterior Parts for Sale
0
08-14-2015 08:54 PM
BAK12484
Tech / General Engine
3
01-04-2002 10:34 PM



Quick Reply: Any Structural Changes from 82 to 92



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 AM.