Smoothed (super glossy) & Painted (black) dash cluster cover
#1
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Smoothed (super glossy) & Painted (black) dash cluster cover
Well finally here are the pics of the dash trimmed out and installed in the car.
I painted the main section gloss black after I smoothed it. Then I painted the lower ledge adn switchs satin black
This paint is super slick!
I painted the main section gloss black after I smoothed it. Then I painted the lower ledge adn switchs satin black
This paint is super slick!
Last edited by redraif; 09-17-2004 at 01:46 PM.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Re: Smoothed (super glossy) & Painted (black) dash cluster cover
Originally posted by redraif
I painted the main section gloss black after I smoothed it.
This paint is super slick!
I painted the main section gloss black after I smoothed it.
This paint is super slick!
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Much better than what it was. Looks decent but I'd say there's too much color breakup in there. Lots of little sections of red. Should see what some painted grey/aluminum pieces would look like to replace some of that red...
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by iansane
Much better than what it was. Looks decent but I'd say there's too much color breakup in there. Lots of little sections of red. Should see what some painted grey/aluminum pieces would look like to replace some of that red...
Much better than what it was. Looks decent but I'd say there's too much color breakup in there. Lots of little sections of red. Should see what some painted grey/aluminum pieces would look like to replace some of that red...
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by CaysE
Wow.... nice mirror finish. I'm thinking the whole dash would look pretty good like that in your car.
Wow.... nice mirror finish. I'm thinking the whole dash would look pretty good like that in your car.
#10
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,378
Likes: 0
From: Thornton colorado
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: TBI
Transmission: 700r4
teh stuff you do to that car never ceases to amaze me, that loosk awesome, but what happens if you get a good glare off your dash now that its nice and glossy, could be fun.
#12
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
looks nice shannon. I'd almost like it a tad more if there was no red on the transparent panels, simple look like "nothing there" and then "something there" verses an outline around the "nothing there" effect.
That's just a personal opinoin, and i'm sure ya got that one b4. Nice job on the paint.
That's just a personal opinoin, and i'm sure ya got that one b4. Nice job on the paint.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by 85f-bird
looks nice shannon. I'd almost like it a tad more if there was no red on the transparent panels, simple look like "nothing there" and then "something there" verses an outline around the "nothing there" effect.
That's just a personal opinoin, and i'm sure ya got that one b4.
looks nice shannon. I'd almost like it a tad more if there was no red on the transparent panels, simple look like "nothing there" and then "something there" verses an outline around the "nothing there" effect.
That's just a personal opinoin, and i'm sure ya got that one b4.
#15
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 2
From: any clime or place...
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen
Originally posted by myfast3rdgen
MOD EDIT
MOD EDIT
I think your car is very tastefully decorated. Maybe a little too much for my own car, but I really like it anyways!
Dare to be different...
Brandon
Last edited by 88txiroc; 09-24-2004 at 04:24 PM.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by myfast3rdgen
MOD EDIT
MOD EDIT
Last edited by 88txiroc; 09-24-2004 at 04:26 PM.
#19
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by LT1guy
WHO Painted it???
WHO Painted it???
Originally posted by myfast3rdgen
MOD EDIT
MOD EDIT
Sad thing is you think its a TA...
Last edited by 88txiroc; 09-24-2004 at 04:26 PM.
#20
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
From: Walnut Creek, CA
Car: 1988 Camaro Sport Coupe Convertible
Engine: Your Momma
Transmission: I can go forwards and backwards
Originally posted by redraif
Sounds like some more 3rdgen.org material...
Sad thing is you think its a TA...
Sounds like some more 3rdgen.org material...
Sad thing is you think its a TA...
Last edited by Joez88Camaro; 09-24-2004 at 02:02 AM.
#21
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Behind the boathouse
Car: Huffy 10 speed ;)
Engine: My legs
Transmission: My wrist
Axle/Gears: Little spokey things
Originally posted by Joez88Camaro
No he isn't 3rdgen.org material, but I am. I'm not trying to be rude, but I find that offensive. A majority of the people there have a very good knowledge of these vehicles and are actually willing to help out people that aren't jerks to them (i'm thinking one post by cheyenne383 who has an AA in automotive tech(and ASE master tech) . when a guy was a complete jerk to him for giving him excellent information). And it's not saying much when you're comparing your car to L03s. I'm not going to go into what I think of the looks of your car, but I find that offensive when you generalize or stereotype members of a 3rdgen.org, people like Mrdude, Silverback, Jeremy, Me, and other that have donated a lot of info to this site from information that we have learned first hand.
No he isn't 3rdgen.org material, but I am. I'm not trying to be rude, but I find that offensive. A majority of the people there have a very good knowledge of these vehicles and are actually willing to help out people that aren't jerks to them (i'm thinking one post by cheyenne383 who has an AA in automotive tech(and ASE master tech) . when a guy was a complete jerk to him for giving him excellent information). And it's not saying much when you're comparing your car to L03s. I'm not going to go into what I think of the looks of your car, but I find that offensive when you generalize or stereotype members of a 3rdgen.org, people like Mrdude, Silverback, Jeremy, Me, and other that have donated a lot of info to this site from information that we have learned first hand.
EDIT: I need to update my profile like crazy.
Last edited by cheyenne383; 09-23-2004 at 05:06 PM.
#23
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Car: 87 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T-56
Seriously, I am with the guys in the last couple posts. Also, you are right, if you post pics, you must accept the bad with the good. IMO, that is hands down the ugliest bird I have ever seen, but like said above, it wasn't built for me.
#27
Banned
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
Car: 83 Camaro Z28
Engine: Carbed 350
Transmission: 700r4
I must say thats a bit too eccentric for me, looks more like something someone pieced together instead of something smoothly put in place once it was finished. The red and the chrome next to each other don't seem to fit in well either.
Last edited by 88txiroc; 09-24-2004 at 04:27 PM.
#29
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by LT1guy
No stickers, no fartcans...but it will outrun most stock V8 305 thirdgens, and its only a V6. Every suspension and drivetrain part in this car has been replaced for better performance, along with tons of appearance mods. It may not be to your liking (news flash:it wasn't built for YOU!), but its not ****.
No stickers, no fartcans...but it will outrun most stock V8 305 thirdgens, and its only a V6. Every suspension and drivetrain part in this car has been replaced for better performance, along with tons of appearance mods. It may not be to your liking (news flash:it wasn't built for YOU!), but its not ****.
It is slow and over done which to me defines ****. You constantly get this response about this car yet you keep asking for opinions on it. If you don't want to hear the quit asking.
P.S. I like the smooth look but not the smoked panels.
#30
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 1
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
That car looks worse and worse with everything that you have done to it....
It is still slow, still riced out, and still somehow tackier then 99% of all the honda boyeeezzzz.
Yall don't roll up to real muscle car shows in that thing do ya?
It is still slow, still riced out, and still somehow tackier then 99% of all the honda boyeeezzzz.
Yall don't roll up to real muscle car shows in that thing do ya?
#31
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
Yall don't roll up to real muscle car shows in that thing do ya?
Yall don't roll up to real muscle car shows in that thing do ya?
I'd giggle like an idiot and then pee my pants.
That car is begging for 5 gallons of gas and a match.
It's just TOO FAR out there.
Couldn't you have just done all that crap to a Geo Metro or a Ford Focus?
I'd have a better sense of humor about your "mods" then . . .
#32
its too flashy for most cars but it goes with the whole over the top theme of your car. It must be fun to drive around in your car because of all the looks . i know i like to get the looks when i drive my trans am .
#33
Originally posted by nolanr0413
its too flashy for most cars but it goes with the whole over the top theme of your car. It must be fun to drive around in your car because of all the looks . i know i like to get the looks when i drive my trans am .
its too flashy for most cars but it goes with the whole over the top theme of your car. It must be fun to drive around in your car because of all the looks . i know i like to get the looks when i drive my trans am .
:lala:
#34
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Littleton Colorado
Car: 84 T/A 70 Chevelle SS 78 T/A
Engine: chevy 383 Chevy 496 Pontiac 462
Transmission: built THM700r4 Richmond 6 built TH400
Originally posted by nolanr0413
its too flashy for most cars but it goes with the whole over the top theme of your car. It must be fun to drive around in your car because of all the looks . i know i like to get the looks when i drive my trans am .
its too flashy for most cars but it goes with the whole over the top theme of your car. It must be fun to drive around in your car because of all the looks . i know i like to get the looks when i drive my trans am .
#35
Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Littleton Colorado
Car: 84 T/A 70 Chevelle SS 78 T/A
Engine: chevy 383 Chevy 496 Pontiac 462
Transmission: built THM700r4 Richmond 6 built TH400
Originally posted by Ragtop89
I prefer positive looks and a quick thumbsup as opposed to a look of utter disgust and then gagging motions as I drive by.
:lala:
I prefer positive looks and a quick thumbsup as opposed to a look of utter disgust and then gagging motions as I drive by.
:lala:
#37
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Joez88Camaro
No he isn't 3rdgen.org material, but I am. I'm not trying to be rude, but I find that offensive. A majority of the people there have a very good knowledge of these vehicles and are actually willing to help out people that aren't jerks to them (i'm thinking one post by cheyenne383 who has an AA in automotive tech. when a guy was a complete jerk to him for giving him excellent information). And it's not saying much when you're comparing your car to L03s. I'm not going to go into what I think of the looks of your car, but I find that offensive when you generalize or stereotype members of a 3rdgen.org, people like Mrdude, Silverback, Jeremy, Me, and other that have donated a lot of info to this site from information that we have learned first hand.
No he isn't 3rdgen.org material, but I am. I'm not trying to be rude, but I find that offensive. A majority of the people there have a very good knowledge of these vehicles and are actually willing to help out people that aren't jerks to them (i'm thinking one post by cheyenne383 who has an AA in automotive tech. when a guy was a complete jerk to him for giving him excellent information). And it's not saying much when you're comparing your car to L03s. I'm not going to go into what I think of the looks of your car, but I find that offensive when you generalize or stereotype members of a 3rdgen.org, people like Mrdude, Silverback, Jeremy, Me, and other that have donated a lot of info to this site from information that we have learned first hand.
What I meant and should have said:
The actual reply is what I have personally seen over and over on 3GO in threads where MY CAR is mentioned. Hence sounding like some material that would come from 3GO REGARDING MY CAR.
Case & point: typical 3GO regarding me
As far as people being willing to help out others who are not jerks to them...well some of the members are jerks to me w/o my starting it, so they are giving 3GO a bad rep. And I have done nothing here on TGO, but try and help people with the experiences I have had. But some members seem to conveniently forget that.
Oh, “I” never compared my car to a LO3. But I think Joe’s point is that the stock 2.8 my car was equipt with could not do this. So it may not be much, but it is an improvement over what the car was and could do. We have a lot of dialing in yet to do with the new combo. Also consider there is not any resource for doing this to a 2.8 or 3.4 with winning combos, like there is for v-8s. There is not a chip I can buy. There is not a shop around here with any experience burning chips for this combo either. We have had to go out on our own with trial and errors. So you should applaud the fact that at least the effort is being made to make the car perform better. And its all done on a daily driver
Last edited by redraif; 09-24-2004 at 03:00 AM.
#38
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: Kenner, La
Car: '86 iroc
Engine: lb9 305
Transmission: 700r4
How many of these responses actually pertain to the cluster cover? That's one reason I like this site, immature stuff like this usually gets locked so I don't accidentally waste my time reading it...
#39
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by cheyenne383
I totally agree. On another note, don't post pictures if you don't want other people's opinions.
I totally agree. On another note, don't post pictures if you don't want other people's opinions.
Originally posted by TMoNeE
Seriously, I am with the guys in the last couple posts. Also, you are right, if you post pics, you must accept the bad with the good. IMO, that is hands down the ugliest bird I have ever seen, but like said above, it wasn't built for me.
Seriously, I am with the guys in the last couple posts. Also, you are right, if you post pics, you must accept the bad with the good. IMO, that is hands down the ugliest bird I have ever seen, but like said above, it wasn't built for me.
Originally posted by sc1twntrbo
autozone must love you. your showing those pepboy ricers up
autozone must love you. your showing those pepboy ricers up
Originally posted by Metal383
that wing on the nose must add alot of downforce
that wing on the nose must add alot of downforce
Originally posted by biff85ta
It is slow and over done which to me defines ****. You constantly get this response about this car yet you keep asking for opinions on it. If you don't want to hear the quit asking.
P.S. I like the smooth look but not the smoked panels.
It is slow and over done which to me defines ****. You constantly get this response about this car yet you keep asking for opinions on it. If you don't want to hear the quit asking.
P.S. I like the smooth look but not the smoked panels.
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
That car looks worse and worse with everything that you have done to it....
It is still slow, still riced out, and still somehow tackier then 99% of all the honda boyeeezzzz.
Yall don't roll up to real muscle car shows in that thing do ya?
That car looks worse and worse with everything that you have done to it....
It is still slow, still riced out, and still somehow tackier then 99% of all the honda boyeeezzzz.
Yall don't roll up to real muscle car shows in that thing do ya?
Super Chevy, World of Wheels (invitation only!), Trans Am Nationals, F-body Gathering, Southern Trans Am Regional Show…to name a few
Originally posted by Ragtop89
That would be funny as hell to see!
I'd giggle like an idiot and then pee my pants.
That would be funny as hell to see!
I'd giggle like an idiot and then pee my pants.
Originally posted by Ragtop89
That car is begging for 5 gallons of gas and a match.
It's just TOO FAR out there.
Couldn't you have just done all that crap to a Geo Metro or a Ford Focus?
I'd have a better sense of humor about your "mods" then . . .
That car is begging for 5 gallons of gas and a match.
It's just TOO FAR out there.
Couldn't you have just done all that crap to a Geo Metro or a Ford Focus?
I'd have a better sense of humor about your "mods" then . . .
Originally posted by Ragtop89
I prefer positive looks and a quick thumbsup as opposed to a look of utter disgust and then gagging motions as I drive by.
I prefer positive looks and a quick thumbsup as opposed to a look of utter disgust and then gagging motions as I drive by.
Last edited by redraif; 09-24-2004 at 02:25 AM.
#40
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by devianb
Interesting.
Interesting.
#41
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by DiabolicalZ
I must say thats a bit too eccentric for me, looks more like something someone pieced together instead of something smoothly put in place once it was finished. The red and the chrome next to each other don't seem to fit in well either.
I must say thats a bit too eccentric for me, looks more like something someone pieced together instead of something smoothly put in place once it was finished. The red and the chrome next to each other don't seem to fit in well either.
Last edited by redraif; 09-24-2004 at 01:18 AM.
#42
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Originally posted by redraif
In all honesty none of our spoilers are functional stock or not, unless you are driving fast enough!
In all honesty none of our spoilers are functional stock or not, unless you are driving fast enough!
#43
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by EvilCartman
Wrong, the stock "duck bill" style rear spoiler is functional. It produces a wopping 6 lbs of downforce at 55 mph. or something close to that number, can't find the brochure image with the exact info.
Wrong, the stock "duck bill" style rear spoiler is functional. It produces a wopping 6 lbs of downforce at 55 mph. or something close to that number, can't find the brochure image with the exact info.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
You also said that we don't have the Autobaun around here which implied, to me at least, that you'd have to be driving 100+ mph
Humm... I see you've edited your post to take out what we're talking about
Humm... I see you've edited your post to take out what we're talking about
#45
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
The only proven spoiler is the Mecham spoiler. This is the one that Pontiac won with. Most spoilers do not serve a true purpose unless you are driving 100+ Like on the Autobahn. Does this mean that since GM produced spoilers that are not really funtional that they were putting out ****. Wow that means there are alot of ricers straight out of GM! This was my point earlier. I have never seen any docs to show what spoilers provide what downforce. The only stock one I have heard anything about being semi funtional is the Aero wing and that was on TGO. Not sure about any real tests on it though.
#46
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Technically, 6 lbs of downforce is a functional spoiler directly from the factory. Even if it didn't win any races, it's still a functional part or it could have been total BS that the publishers threw in the sales brochure back in '82.
#47
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Well considering I don't have a library of borchures to read up on, I said I had not seen any that said what is or is not functional.
#48
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: Behind the boathouse
Car: Huffy 10 speed ;)
Engine: My legs
Transmission: My wrist
Axle/Gears: Little spokey things
Originally posted by redraif
Oh, “I” never compared my car to a LO3. But I think Joe’s point is that the stock 2.8 my car was equipt with could not do this. So it may not be much, but it is an improvement over what the car was and could do. We have a lot of dialing in yet to do with the new combo. Also consider there is not any resource for doing this to a 2.8 or 3.4 with winning combos, like there is for v-8s. There is not a chip I can buy. There is not a shop around here with any experience burning chips for this combo either. We have had to go out on our own with trial and errors. So you should applaud the fact that at least the effort is being made to make the car perform better. And its all done on a daily driver
Oh, “I” never compared my car to a LO3. But I think Joe’s point is that the stock 2.8 my car was equipt with could not do this. So it may not be much, but it is an improvement over what the car was and could do. We have a lot of dialing in yet to do with the new combo. Also consider there is not any resource for doing this to a 2.8 or 3.4 with winning combos, like there is for v-8s. There is not a chip I can buy. There is not a shop around here with any experience burning chips for this combo either. We have had to go out on our own with trial and errors. So you should applaud the fact that at least the effort is being made to make the car perform better. And its all done on a daily driver
Originally posted by redraif
[B]Has nothing to do with the actual opinion, just the lack of point to this tread! B]
[B]Has nothing to do with the actual opinion, just the lack of point to this tread! B]
#49
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow Kentucky
Car: 04 Vette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by redraif
Again did not ask about you opinion on performance or anything else. Just posted pics of the dash, but people seem to have lost this point! Though at least you stated a relavant point to this thread
Again did not ask about you opinion on performance or anything else. Just posted pics of the dash, but people seem to have lost this point! Though at least you stated a relavant point to this thread