Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

GM rust problem in 82-92 timeframe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2003, 08:49 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
MechCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '92 Camaro RS, '93 Ranger
Engine: LO3, Vulcan
Transmission: 700R4, M5OD
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.45
GM rust problem in 82-92 timeframe

I've been starting to wodner about this. It seems that if you got a Van Nuys car, you were in trouble ten years later. My Firebird had the underbody coated, and now theres barely a floor panel left, the wheel wells are gone, and the door almost has holes clear through. The doors have nothing to do with the underbody

A friend of mine has a '90 Sunbird, same problems. Except he can see road through the door and floor.

A quick look at the school's parking lot, another Sunbird of the same timeframe and a Van Nuys piece of work (checked vin) had the same problem.

Was there a problem with the undercoating at Van Nuys? I'm getting really mad seeing that the parts that weren't undercoated are in better shape than the parts that were undercoated.

On the flip side, my dad's Ford '90 Tempo was undercoated, and he only has a little rust comapred to the GMs of '90. Rust is expected for a '90, but having the wheel wells dissappear, or the doors disintegrate aren't exactly what I'd call expected wear.

It seems that the doors don't seal well, or seal in the wrong places, and water sits in crevices that should be sealed and aren't. Other '90 era cars don't have similar problems, and they were taken care of similarly in the same general location.

What I've been seeing on my car is the undercoating in the wheel wells somehow got water trapped underneath and caused everything to rust out. Only then does the undercoating fall off to reveal it's evil doings. By the time you notice soemthing is wrong, everything is wrong LOL

Last edited by MechCD; 07-09-2003 at 08:51 AM.
Old 07-09-2003, 09:03 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
nolanr0413's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,790
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Trans am
i think its just bad lucj that you found all of those cars, did you ever think that they van nuys was not the problem and that it was the owners, the owners of all the cars probably drove the cars in the winter and didnt take care of the car. thats probably what happened.
Old 07-09-2003, 10:54 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,873
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
My '87 was a VanNuys car and it doesn't have rust problems. I was underneath the car last night and I was amazed that the thing didn't have a spot of rust.

Not to mention its lived most of its life in the Puget Sound area which as we all know, eats cars.
Old 07-09-2003, 12:19 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
omcrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oakland Ca.
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 5.7L/L98
Transmission: 700r4
I just did some detailing underneath and it looks good as new! I feel bad for you guys in the snow states that use salt on the road. I would keep my car parked and drive a thrasher pick up in the winter.
Old 07-09-2003, 02:02 PM
  #5  
TGO Supporter

iTrader: (2)
 
Jim85IROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Readsboro, VT
Posts: 13,579
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
The quality of the steel mattered more than the undercoating. Generally the quality of the steel in the 80s was **** poor compared to now, plus the modern panels have some pretty heavy galvinization.
Old 07-09-2003, 02:25 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Posts: 3,238
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2
Yeah, they do a better job of rust-proofing from the factory now. But for you poor folks in Ohio and other parts of the snowy east it is the SALT that has done you in
Old 07-09-2003, 02:50 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,873
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
The extent of my rust problem:
Attached Thumbnails GM rust problem in 82-92 timeframe-image060.jpg  
Old 07-10-2003, 11:55 AM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
MechCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '92 Camaro RS, '93 Ranger
Engine: LO3, Vulcan
Transmission: 700R4, M5OD
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.45
That doeswn't look too bad.

I'll have to admit all of the cars I'm poking at were driven everyday, with no other vehicle to drive. And no one fixed the rust when it was easily fixable, so I guess the owners are at fault.... But still, how do you maintain undercoating? It looked ok until it fell off and the rust was already bad.


This looks bad. I'm having a steel plate welded over the strut towers and the holes patched up. I'm a poor HS student and a friend is welding it for free. Maybe in 5 years I'll get a new wheel well like I hsould be doing now.... But this willg et me through what I need it to get me through
Attached Thumbnails GM rust problem in 82-92 timeframe-dscf0530.jpg  
Old 07-10-2003, 12:02 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 2,873
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
whoa - thats a rust problem......
Old 07-10-2003, 12:03 PM
  #10  
Member

 
HanSoloWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Centerville, Ohio
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '05 Pontiac G6
Engine: 3.5
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Slow lol.
Mine is a Van Nuys car as well and has a couple trouble spots. I'd assume it was poor care from the first owner or something, or just sh*tty Ohio weather and road salt, lol. Worst spots are on the drivers rear quarter and the passenger door is coming apart. I'm sure the door was caused by bad weatherstriping. It's pretty dry and half there. And I haven't pecked around too much more, but my strut towers may be needing some metal. I hate rust, lol.

Last edited by HanSoloWS6; 07-10-2003 at 12:07 PM.
Old 07-10-2003, 07:11 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeh i freakin hate ohio weather i would move in a second. I had my front suspension detailed and my rear end what happened i got stuck in the snow once and had to drve it in the salt. Now my once nicley painted control arms and rear end r mostly surface rust now. Ugggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!! salt kills
Old 07-10-2003, 07:27 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member
 
85SportCoupeto89RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cove, Arkansas
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 85 Camaro SC
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
Dang and I thought my 82Z was bad but, wow I just have to cut out and patch up my floorpans in the passenger side compartment.
Did the strut tower break apart while you were driving????
Old 07-11-2003, 03:41 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
EvilCartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
The only rust my 82 had was where the paint had flaked off on the roof, deck lid and a couple areas around the windshield. I don't see any rust under the car, was just under it 30 min ago lol. Everything is still nice looking
Old 07-11-2003, 05:40 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
u live in CA also
Old 07-11-2003, 06:11 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
EvilCartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
u live in CA also
Yup Doesn't mean cars don't rust to nothing out here though. I saw a 90 something Toyota that was out by the coast just covered in rust on the chassis. Up here where I live, there's plenty of cars around that are rusting out, we do get snow in CA
Old 07-11-2003, 06:24 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i guess u would in northern ca
Old 07-11-2003, 07:16 AM
  #17  
Moderator

 
okfoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,242
Received 170 Likes on 125 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
Shoot, my parts cars are in better shape than some of those you describe... and I live in MI... The land of the salted roads, of course my cars do not see winter...

John
Old 07-11-2003, 09:41 AM
  #18  
Member

 
rubbermanZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Knox County, Ohio
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 355c.i.
Transmission: Turbo 350, w/shift kit
My 84 Z28 is from there (i checked the VIN) and she was sitting for about 2-3 years and there is just a little rust underneath, hardly any on the body....the underneath will take like 1 hour to fix not bad at all, maybe i got lucky.
Old 07-11-2003, 10:12 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
Excrazymac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rust-free is the way to be.

MY '83 TA has no rust problems and it is from Van Nuys. The paint is crap, but there's no rust. It could be that it is a Cali car. Most Van Nuys cars went to Cali (duh), so they might not have been as prepared for Salt and other rust-inducing chemicals. I don't know, but I'm sorry for your problem.
Old 07-11-2003, 11:58 AM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
MechCD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '92 Camaro RS, '93 Ranger
Engine: LO3, Vulcan
Transmission: 700R4, M5OD
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.45
Originally posted by 85SportCoupeto89RS
Dang and I thought my 82Z was bad but, wow I just have to cut out and patch up my floorpans in the passenger side compartment.
Did the strut tower break apart while you were driving????
The pic of the passenger side shows a little better of how things were when I bought the car. The struts were deader than dead. I took them out and they don't even exert and force. Thety stay compressed all by themselves. The drivers side strut came out last and I was mad and ripped the thing out taking the mount with it. There wasn't much holding it in, and it didn't take much ripping. I did drive it with the mounts like that though..... it handled better than some other cars I've rode in. Thats crazy considering those were the original struts on a 13 year old car with 291,000 miles on it.

My welder buddy is stopping by today with gridning tools (he didn't specify) to grind down to any decent metal. He's taking the sheet metal out to get plasma cut for free. Then hopefully by this weekend, the new steel will be welded in, and I can start putting the new struts in and chaging the shocks. I just hope everything is aligned enough to drive it 2 miles to the closest auto shop that does wheel alignment.

*this pic is of the passenger side. The driver's side looked somewhat like this until I gave the strut a yank without taking the brake hose clip off. The brake hose was not on the clip, that would have been bad.

EDIT: I just thought of this, but I might as well stick it here isntead of a new thread. A body shop estimated $1400 to fix those holes. That initially sounded like way too much, but after I got everything apart, it seems reasonable. Problem is, the car was $700 and I haven't paid that off yet, so I really can't spend $1400 quite yet
Attached Thumbnails GM rust problem in 82-92 timeframe-dscf0534.jpg  

Last edited by MechCD; 07-11-2003 at 12:01 PM.
Old 07-11-2003, 01:55 PM
  #21  
Senior Member

 
wm_sorg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Annandale, VA
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: 2001 LS1 Modded
Transmission: 2001 4L60E Yank SS3600 TC
1400 seems reasonable when you consider the extent of that repair. Make sure you use strong metal to replace that old stuff. There is a lot of stress in that area. Good luck.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
6
09-08-2015 03:38 PM
hemicudakidd
Body
5
08-31-2015 06:23 AM
neekolzun
Body
32
08-24-2015 04:59 PM
89lsc
Interior Parts for Sale
0
08-14-2015 04:58 PM
Leggman1
Brakes
6
08-12-2015 08:39 PM



Quick Reply: GM rust problem in 82-92 timeframe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 PM.