Notch Back
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sharonville OH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
Notch Back
Any one got pics of a firebird with a notch back? More spefically of the one gtautoacc.net offers? I would do a search but well...
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Schodack, NY
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 Auto With Shift Kit
Thats the hatch that my IROC has...I like it but theres not much visibility out of the back window....It makes the car look soo much better.....
~RJ~
~RJ~
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Buffalo, New York, USA
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Out of curiousity, does anyone know why they didnt make a replica of the original Notchback design?
I imagine no one wanted to give it up as a mold, lol.
Im not raggin on GTAuto, i think we're very fortunate to havea company willing to reproduce old and new parts for out generation cars, im just curious why the completely differnet design...
I imagine no one wanted to give it up as a mold, lol.
Im not raggin on GTAuto, i think we're very fortunate to havea company willing to reproduce old and new parts for out generation cars, im just curious why the completely differnet design...
#9
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,242
Received 170 Likes
on
125 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I believe the reason he did not dulicate the original 88 hatch was there is some structural challenges to the original design. George's (GTAuto's) design is stronger.
John
John
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
There are at least three aftermarket ones that have been available (Motion Glass, GT Auto, and some company out of Texas), but I still prefer the original one. The original notchback to me looks natural, like it belongs...the others to me look like they're trying to make the 3rd gen into something its not. If I can get my hands on an original notch, I know a few people who would probably help me make repros.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Edison, NJ
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: WCT5
theres a guy in my town... Edison, NJ whos selling an original notchback 67K miles... when i asked him how much he was asking $12,500 for it... such a sweet looking car
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92 Trans Am 'Vert
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 Speed
GTAutos design is completley hideous. If you look at it from the side, it has the EXACT same dimensions as the stock glass... this leads me to believe that their hatch was merely molded from a stock hatch, with a section cut out. At least, thats the impression I get. The whole point of the notchback is to enhance the body lines for the car, and GTAutos does nothign of the sort.
If you would like a hatch that is close to origonal, call Motion Glass, in NY. Their hatch is pretty close to the origional.
If you would like a hatch that is close to origonal, call Motion Glass, in NY. Their hatch is pretty close to the origional.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sharonville OH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
I like the way gtauto's looks but it happens to be on a camaro not a firebird . I like the lines of it and losing the 8 billion pound stock glass piece would be cool.
Last edited by Cronic3rd; 02-15-2003 at 06:02 PM.
#15
Supreme Member
Is that spoiler centerpiece built into the notchback, or did they just primer the whole center? I was thinking a notchback might look even better without the spoiler.
Mathius
Mathius
#16
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Posts: 14,242
Received 170 Likes
on
125 Posts
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I Believe that the Stock Notchback used the base Firebird Spoiler and high mount light.
John
John
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '90 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73's
Originally posted by 88 WS6 TransAm GTA
GTAutos design is completley hideous. If you look at it from the side, it has the EXACT same dimensions as the stock glass... this leads me to believe that their hatch was merely molded from a stock hatch, with a section cut out. At least, thats the impression I get. The whole point of the notchback is to enhance the body lines for the car, and GTAutos does nothign of the sort.
GTAutos design is completley hideous. If you look at it from the side, it has the EXACT same dimensions as the stock glass... this leads me to believe that their hatch was merely molded from a stock hatch, with a section cut out. At least, thats the impression I get. The whole point of the notchback is to enhance the body lines for the car, and GTAutos does nothign of the sort.
From the side it looks like someone forgot to mask off the rear window before it went into a paint booth.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cherry Hill, NJ
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 92 Trans Am 'Vert
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Originally posted by SBlackfoot
From the side it looks like someone forgot to mask off the rear window before it went into a paint booth.
From the side it looks like someone forgot to mask off the rear window before it went into a paint booth.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by Cronic3rd
I like the way gtauto's looks but it happens to be on a camaro not a firebird . I like the lines of it and losing the 8 billion pound stock glass piece would be cool.
I like the way gtauto's looks but it happens to be on a camaro not a firebird . I like the lines of it and losing the 8 billion pound stock glass piece would be cool.
Stock notchbacks came with the stock pedestal style Firebird spoiler...Aerowings wouldn't fit, and they weren't going to make a specific one for so few cars.
#22
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: parkville maryland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 trans am
Engine: 5.0 tpi gtauto ramair and notch
Transmission: 700 r4
http://community.webshots.com/album/47844782dELDPG
here is a few pics of mine with the notch interior is gutted now putting in 4th gen leather carpet and grey pannels....also power windows...pic comming soon on the progress
here is a few pics of mine with the notch interior is gutted now putting in 4th gen leather carpet and grey pannels....also power windows...pic comming soon on the progress
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
must limit vision back there too.. the rear pillars are already enough of a blind spot!!
#25
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: parkville maryland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 trans am
Engine: 5.0 tpi gtauto ramair and notch
Transmission: 700 r4
thanks LT1....... yes the blind spot takes a little getting used to..but no big deal now
#26
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sharonville OH
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 98 Z28 vert
Engine: LS1
Transmission: automagic
Axle/Gears: 2.73 - boo racing yay MPG
Nice bird paul. Thankx. BTW gtautos claims 1/2 the weight of the stock peice with their notchback.
#27
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: parkville maryland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 trans am
Engine: 5.0 tpi gtauto ramair and notch
Transmission: 700 r4
thanks yes it is much lighter i can handle the notch with no help took it off a few times and put it back with no problem but the glass one is another story
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elk Grove Village, IL
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I don't like the GTAuto notchback, but this image from your site looks good. Kind'of reminds me of a Testarossa.
http://community.webshots.com/image2...4fZPxbS_ph.jpg
However, I can't stand the profile of it. I like the look of the stock notchback because of the different body line it gives the car. THe GTAuto notchback doens't change the profile lines at all.
http://community.webshots.com/image2...4fZPxbS_ph.jpg
However, I can't stand the profile of it. I like the look of the stock notchback because of the different body line it gives the car. THe GTAuto notchback doens't change the profile lines at all.
#29
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: parkville maryland
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 trans am
Engine: 5.0 tpi gtauto ramair and notch
Transmission: 700 r4
yea i much rather have a factory style...been looking for 2 years finaly found one and the guy decided from all the calls he got it was very desirable and kept it.....but the gt auto from the rear i like the looks. it grows on you now i like it alot
the link you put up does not work btw
the link you put up does not work btw
#30
Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA - USA
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#31
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cove, Arkansas
Posts: 2,760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Camaro SC
Engine: V6
Transmission: 700r4
I like the look of the factory notchback better than the GTAuto's. Theres looks like they just got a regular hatch glass used it to make the form of the mold, and then made the notchback part. I like the fatcory one because it changes the body lines and looks more subtile than the GTAuto's.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fronzizzle
Suspension and Chassis
6
03-18-2019 08:29 PM