82-84 ground effects
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
82-84 ground effects
delete thanks
Last edited by Randy82WS7; 04-11-2006 at 02:41 PM.
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 305HO L69
Transmission: T5
it would look exactly the same as an 85-87 with no gfx. you would have to fill in all of the holes, plus you would have a problem with the front and rear bumpers. for the rear, you would have to get a non gfx bumper, or deal with the fact that it sticks out and hangs over where the rear quarter gfx were. the front end, you would also have to get a non-gfx front end, leave the front spoiler on, or take it off and have it look obvious that it's missing a piece. If you're really interested in doing this, I have a non-gfx rear bumper in great shape, and a front end that could be fixed.
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Personally.....I think the base Camaro looks kind of ugly....it sets up all high and the front nose...u...g....l...y....they just don't have that low agressive stance....My favorite ground effect package is the 91-92 RS/Z28's....the look bad as hell. But these are just opinions......so guys with the standard Camaro's...please don't get mad....after all....if it's a Camaro....it's the best!:rockon:
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
wild.,,, sounds like i better leave it all on, i dbout all that ABS weighs anything anyways. not like im gonna notice any weight loss by rmeoving it all
thanks!
thanks!
#6
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by EvilCartman
Leave it all on!!!!! They look ugly as hell without it.
Leave it all on!!!!! They look ugly as hell without it.
I think It looks cool with just the Z28 nose and no GFX, its something different …
Last edited by bj350hp; 06-06-2013 at 11:32 AM.
#7
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: So.west IN
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes
on
23 Posts
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
base 84 camaro (yes it is a p.o.s.... ugly, if you see it that way, is just a bonus...)
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
hey wow the Z28 nose fascia with no body ground effecyts does look prety neat, hmmm
makes it kinda sorta in a way look more like the second gen style, at least to me anyways.
hmmmm !
anyone got a closer shot of a Z28 with some/most of the gfx removed ?
bj350hp does yours hve the rear quarter effects on still ? i cant hardly tell, thanks!
makes it kinda sorta in a way look more like the second gen style, at least to me anyways.
hmmmm !
anyone got a closer shot of a Z28 with some/most of the gfx removed ?
bj350hp does yours hve the rear quarter effects on still ? i cant hardly tell, thanks!
#10
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Fast68
hey wow the Z28 nose fascia with no body ground effecyts does look prety neat, hmmm
makes it kinda sorta in a way look more like the second gen style, at least to me anyways.
hmmmm !
anyone got a closer shot of a Z28 with some/most of the gfx removed ?
bj350hp does yours hve the rear quarter effects on still ? i cant hardly tell, thanks!
hey wow the Z28 nose fascia with no body ground effecyts does look prety neat, hmmm
makes it kinda sorta in a way look more like the second gen style, at least to me anyways.
hmmmm !
anyone got a closer shot of a Z28 with some/most of the gfx removed ?
bj350hp does yours hve the rear quarter effects on still ? i cant hardly tell, thanks!
Last edited by bj350hp; 06-06-2013 at 01:15 PM.
#11
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by bj350hp
But geting a base camaro Bumber is not hard just go look at some Junk yards im sure thay well have a base camaro or 2
But geting a base camaro Bumber is not hard just go look at some Junk yards im sure thay well have a base camaro or 2
wil 85-92 rear bumper covers fit/work on 82 84 ?
thanks!
#12
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
anyone got a good pic of a base camaro rear lower quarter panel that shows how the base bumper cover looks ? are they actually shorter in height than a Z28 one or just different design appearance and same size ??
#14
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
need pic of rear side wraparound part of the rear base camaro style of bumper cover, for comparison to gfx style purposes.
thanks
thanks
#15
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Fast68
need pic of rear side wraparound part of the rear base camaro style of bumper cover, for comparison to gfx style purposes.
thanks
need pic of rear side wraparound part of the rear base camaro style of bumper cover, for comparison to gfx style purposes.
thanks
#16
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
thanks!
so is it just an illusion that gfx rear covers are taller than base ones ?
it looks like- by unbolting my last gfx piece in front of rear cover- i should have damn near the same appearance as a base camaro back there ? not much different at all really from what i can tell by looking at pics and inspecting closely on the 84 Z28 out here. my rear bumper cover comes dow to bottom of rear quarter panel and stops at the tail of it also just like it seem the base one does in the above pic, wouldnt have much of a different appearance at all if i rmeove my last gfx piece and retaiend use of the Z28 bumper cover.
or am i missing something ?
thanks
so is it just an illusion that gfx rear covers are taller than base ones ?
it looks like- by unbolting my last gfx piece in front of rear cover- i should have damn near the same appearance as a base camaro back there ? not much different at all really from what i can tell by looking at pics and inspecting closely on the 84 Z28 out here. my rear bumper cover comes dow to bottom of rear quarter panel and stops at the tail of it also just like it seem the base one does in the above pic, wouldnt have much of a different appearance at all if i rmeove my last gfx piece and retaiend use of the Z28 bumper cover.
or am i missing something ?
thanks
#17
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
The bumper is indented where the GFX should be, so it's not coming out of the Bumper, it's going in.
Take a look at this pic, you can kind of tell that its indented. It's not a great pic. Best thing i can tell you is go to a junk yard and look at a base camaro Rear bumper, or if you see one around town stop and look at it.
Take a look at this pic, you can kind of tell that its indented. It's not a great pic. Best thing i can tell you is go to a junk yard and look at a base camaro Rear bumper, or if you see one around town stop and look at it.
Last edited by bj350hp; 06-06-2013 at 01:19 PM.
#18
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
And here is the bumper you have.
Like I said these pic really don't help you, you have to see it for yourself to know what I'm talking about.
Like I said these pic really don't help you, you have to see it for yourself to know what I'm talking about.
Last edited by bj350hp; 06-06-2013 at 01:21 PM.
#19
Originally posted by bj350hp
Actuly The bumper is Indented Where the GFX should be So its not Coming out of the Bumper its going in
Take alook at this pic you can kind of tell that its Indented. But its not a great pic so best thing i can tell you is go to a Junk yard and look at a base camaro Rear bumper Or if you see one around town stop and look at it
Actuly The bumper is Indented Where the GFX should be So its not Coming out of the Bumper its going in
Take alook at this pic you can kind of tell that its Indented. But its not a great pic so best thing i can tell you is go to a Junk yard and look at a base camaro Rear bumper Or if you see one around town stop and look at it
#20
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
hm very interesting, yeah i think im only gonna be able to understand this by seeing base model in person, hmm
the bumper covers are all same heght from bottom edge up to to the top side of them, right ? it looks like they would have to be..
im thinking iit stil may not look horrible if the front and rear bumper cover gfx pieces were left intact and if the rocker panel and door bottom pieces were removed., hmm.,
thanks
the bumper covers are all same heght from bottom edge up to to the top side of them, right ? it looks like they would have to be..
im thinking iit stil may not look horrible if the front and rear bumper cover gfx pieces were left intact and if the rocker panel and door bottom pieces were removed., hmm.,
thanks
#22
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by fast83camaro
just a pic of my 83 sc front end...
just a pic of my 83 sc front end...
Last edited by Randy82WS7; 10-12-2002 at 09:37 AM.
#23
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Fast68
howcome your parking lamps look so narrow and tall to be 82-84 ones ? dont tell me there were also different parking lamps made in same years also ??
howcome your parking lamps look so narrow and tall to be 82-84 ones ? dont tell me there were also different parking lamps made in same years also ??
Haha, yes everything is different. 82-84 Z28 nose had different ones, 82-84 base camaro different ones, and the base camaro 85-87 nose had different ones. The only parking lights that where same are the 85-92 GFX cars. They used the same parking lights from 85-92
Last edited by bj350hp; 06-06-2013 at 01:23 PM.
#24
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
wierd, so only real way to know if a car is 85-up or not is by taillights, then hmm., damn.
whats an SC considered to be ? base ? sport ?
what about berlinettas ? base ?
as far as front noses are concerned*
whats an SC considered to be ? base ? sport ?
what about berlinettas ? base ?
as far as front noses are concerned*
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Valley Head, AL
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1983 Camaro "SC-350"
Engine: Mild 350 4-bolt
Transmission: 700R4 w/ TCI Stall
Sport Coupe is considered to be the base model, then the berlinetta, then the RS in the later years, Z28, and of course the Iroc-Z.
But, I consider the SC to be the best for racing, mainly because it was not as well optioned, and didn't have ground effects so it was lighter.
But, I consider the SC to be the best for racing, mainly because it was not as well optioned, and didn't have ground effects so it was lighter.
#26
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Cool deal, that straightens it out pretty well
thanks
thanks
Originally posted by fast83camaro
Sport Coupe is considered to be the base model, then the berlinetta, then the RS in the later years, Z28, and of course the Iroc-Z.
But, I consider the SC to be the best for racing, mainly because it was not as well optioned, and didn't have ground effects so it was lighter.
Sport Coupe is considered to be the base model, then the berlinetta, then the RS in the later years, Z28, and of course the Iroc-Z.
But, I consider the SC to be the best for racing, mainly because it was not as well optioned, and didn't have ground effects so it was lighter.
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Originally posted by bj350hp
and heres the bumper you have
but like i said these pic really dont help you have to see it for your self to know what im talking about
and heres the bumper you have
but like i said these pic really dont help you have to see it for your self to know what im talking about
#28
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by EvilCartman
Wow, someone actually saved a picture of my car lol
Wow, someone actually saved a picture of my car lol
Last edited by bj350hp; 06-06-2013 at 01:25 PM.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I always liked the look of third gens with ground effects, because
it gives the illusion of the car being lower to the ground. However,
those are some nice looking sport coupes in this thread.
it gives the illusion of the car being lower to the ground. However,
those are some nice looking sport coupes in this thread.
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Hey nazzz28, those 91-92 Z28/RS rims look good on your Z! Never seen an 82-84 style with them...and I like it!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post