Ferrari Hatched Camaro
05-09-2003 | 10:49 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Ferrari Hatched Camaro
Whats your opinion on this hatch....I don't think it looks that great....not a big fan of the square effect you get looking straight at the back.
Interesting though...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6161
Interesting though...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6161
05-09-2003 | 12:29 PM
#2
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Hm... it's kinda neat... but eh. :: shrug ::
Probably would look better with the little 3 pc. spoiler rather than that one.
Probably would look better with the little 3 pc. spoiler rather than that one.
05-09-2003 | 02:24 PM
#5
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Personally, I love Targas, but not on all cars. I don't think thirdgens can pull off the targa look that well because of size of the sailpanel. I love the targa look on the K1 Evoluzione because they added a side window to the pillars which I think makes the hatch look a lot better.
Trending Topics
05-10-2003 | 11:54 PM
#9
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: louisville, ky usa
Originally posted by zer0321
Yeah it is, check the vin#.
It came with the LB9 engine, which was only available on the Z28 at the time that care was made...
Yeah it is, check the vin#.
It came with the LB9 engine, which was only available on the Z28 at the time that care was made...
BTW notice my sig which I didn't include the first time.
![[VU]Juan's Avatar](data:image/svg+xml;utf8,<svg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' viewBox='0 0 50 50'><circle class='avatar-circle-default' fill='%23bfcc8d' cx='25px' cy='25px' r='20px'></circle><text class='avatar-text-default' x='49%' y='53%' fill='white' text-anchor='middle' alignment-baseline='middle'>[</text></svg>)
05-11-2003 | 12:30 AM
#11
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by 91z4me
While from the vin it is a LB9 engine, that does not mean it was a Z remember the B4C's? Also notice the hood. NOT stock. That looks like an 84Z hood. And since the rear picture is so poor I can't see a definate Z28 on the lower pass side of the bumper. Also I know there is not a Tuned Port Injection on the driver side of the rear bumper. This car could very well have been a Z but to me now it ain't. Anyone who messes up a car this much takes away all the value. I would be pretty sure the SPID list isn't in the driver's side rear compartment either. That is probably long gone. To me it ain't a Z.
While from the vin it is a LB9 engine, that does not mean it was a Z remember the B4C's? Also notice the hood. NOT stock. That looks like an 84Z hood. And since the rear picture is so poor I can't see a definate Z28 on the lower pass side of the bumper. Also I know there is not a Tuned Port Injection on the driver side of the rear bumper. This car could very well have been a Z but to me now it ain't. Anyone who messes up a car this much takes away all the value. I would be pretty sure the SPID list isn't in the driver's side rear compartment either. That is probably long gone. To me it ain't a Z.
I guess since my car doesn't have the sticker on the back bumper and not the original hood its not an Iroc.
Oh well. 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
