wtf? camaro wagon? haha
#4
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
it doesn't looked PS'd to me, it looks like the put the front clip on a wagon, and made/moddified GFXs to fit.
#7
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 489
Likes: 2
From: FL
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Dewey316
it doesn't looked PS'd to me, it looks like the put the front clip on a wagon, and made/moddified GFXs to fit.
it doesn't looked PS'd to me, it looks like the put the front clip on a wagon, and made/moddified GFXs to fit.
this place sells this kit http://www.laureneng.com/
Trending Topics
#10
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: Can you say stroke?!?!
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Yeah, there's a guy that lives close ot me that has one of those kits on his mid 80's El Camino. Cool car, just looks funny.
#18
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Car: '86 TransAm WS6
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Custom TH700R4
That's a Malibu, or another A-body wagon. I put 250,000 miles on one, I'd recognise it anywhere.
The conversion noses for the A/G-bodies are too flat through the headlight area. Of course, if they were the right profile, they would make the front overhang extremely long, and throw the propotions off even more.
The conversion noses for the A/G-bodies are too flat through the headlight area. Of course, if they were the right profile, they would make the front overhang extremely long, and throw the propotions off even more.
#19
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL...for now
Car: 1987 F150...PAAARTY FOUL!
Engine: 300 I6 stump pullin sumbiscuit
Transmission: 4 speed grind box
Axle/Gears: 3.55 unlimited slip differential
and we are supposed to be car lovers? ANYBODY WITH GLAUCOMA can tell what that is. IT ISN'T PHOTOSHOPPED PEOPLE. it is a MALIBU (MAHLEEBOO) wagon with a CAMARO (CAHMAHROW) ground effects kit from lauren engineering on it. they make it for the EL CAMINO too. damn why must we always stir the $h!t? EVERYTHING IS NOT A CONSPIRACY!!!!!!
#21
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL...for now
Car: 1987 F150...PAAARTY FOUL!
Engine: 300 I6 stump pullin sumbiscuit
Transmission: 4 speed grind box
Axle/Gears: 3.55 unlimited slip differential
THANK YOU.... sorry 'bout that it just seems everytime i turn around i see something else that could have very easily happened being questioned and "picked apart" and people who could be telling the ***'s honest truth told that they are liars. it just gets annoying after a while. so now that is my new saying "everything is not a conspiracy"
#27
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1LV6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by fastcamaro350
I wish someone made that hatch wagon thing for a thirdgen.....
I wish someone made that hatch wagon thing for a thirdgen.....
#30
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
Originally posted by 91FIREBIRDGT
They actually did make that for a thirdgen, and come to think of it also the 2nd gen too. Someone should have pics of them on here. don't like the 2nd gen, but the 3rd and 4th look nice.
They actually did make that for a thirdgen, and come to think of it also the 2nd gen too. Someone should have pics of them on here. don't like the 2nd gen, but the 3rd and 4th look nice.
2nd gen : 1977 Type K Trans Am Wagon
<hr>
3rd gen : the GTA Kammback
<hr>
4th gen : the "Hurst Hauler" (same car, diff pic)
#33
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1LV6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 85SportCoupeto89RS
The person who did the 2nd gen has some reall good fab skillz
The person who did the 2nd gen has some reall good fab skillz
#37
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 744
Likes: 1
From: England UK
Car: 85 Z28
Engine: LG4 modified
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by 91FIREBIRDGT
Weren't these done by GM? I thought GM fabbed these creations as show cars.
Weren't these done by GM? I thought GM fabbed these creations as show cars.
One was silver, the other was gold, and both had matching luggage. The gold one was crushed, and the silver one was the only survivor of that little idea.
Si
#38
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
From: ny-lindy
Car: 1989 Iroc z hardtop
Engine: peanut LB9
Transmission: slopomatic TH700R4
there all disgusting if you ask me, i like the rear hatch in 3rd gens. i've never liked wagons, i sometimes have to move one at work, and i take my car instead. they are a pitafall excuse for someone not to buy a truck.
#40
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
From: ny-lindy
Car: 1989 Iroc z hardtop
Engine: peanut LB9
Transmission: slopomatic TH700R4
i must agree, not really likin the whole style of it, but must admit that color is hott. i should of painted my car with it, but i also like the rims, - for effort
#42
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,572
Likes: 26
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
dude, i would buy one for my camaro if i could find one. i saw that fourth gen on hot rod tv or something. they said that it significantly helps aerodynamics too.
#43
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
There was also an 84 Trans AM Anniversary car that had that wagon hatch too. Even though I don't like the looks of it, it would be nice to have, especially when it comes time to move things.
#44
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1LV6
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by devianb
There was also an 84 Trans AM Anniversary car that had that wagon hatch too. Even though I don't like the looks of it, it would be nice to have, especially when it comes time to move things.
There was also an 84 Trans AM Anniversary car that had that wagon hatch too. Even though I don't like the looks of it, it would be nice to have, especially when it comes time to move things.
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
From: decatur IL
Car: 86 iroc, 87 iroc, 89 iroc, 89 formula, 84 supra, 85 trans am
Engine: t\a motor 355 lt1 intake, t56,the works, 89 roc 427 sbc tt project
Transmission: to many to list
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 4:10 in the T/A
the car started life as a malibu wagon, then had the iroc conversion and ground effects for the el camino put on.
thanks
anthony
thanks
anthony
#46
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
From: Sheridan, WY
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I'm sorry but that wagon stuff on 3rd/4th gens really make me wanna puke, why would you want your bad *** muscle car lookin like a station wagon.. i dunno, maybe yall see sumthin i dont
#48
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Originally posted by easySPEEDcamaro
now that's a family car :hail:
now that's a family car :hail:
The HURST Hauler.....now maybe my wife would let me get on of those! When I was looking for a new car she said to get almost anything I wanted (within price range) that is something "practical"....... seems like a perfect match here....
#49
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 0
From: Surrey, BC Wheels:KMC Clocker 17"
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: upgrading...
Transmission: upgrading...
Originally posted by 91FIREBIRDGT
you mean this one?
you mean this one?
the 84 anniversary ones had a body-colored panel there instead.. and as you can see in the picture, there ARE foglight pockets there.