Check out this TWIN TURBO supra rear lighted pretty cool 3rd Gen. Camaro! pretty cool
#6
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 Anniversary Edition
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner 5-Speed
6
i got a link to the website explaning everything about this car somewhere if anybody wants to see
i got a link to the website explaning everything about this car somewhere if anybody wants to see
Trending Topics
#12
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Between the pacific and the atlantic
Car: 1990 RS
Engine: too small
Transmission: broken
First off motor----- OH YEAH!!!!
Body----:nono: I do not like it.
Interior-----Dash and gauges=ugh yuck, seats ect... I like them
Over all-----eeeh its definetly different but not really my cup-o-tea.
Body----:nono: I do not like it.
Interior-----Dash and gauges=ugh yuck, seats ect... I like them
Over all-----eeeh its definetly different but not really my cup-o-tea.
#14
I think that car is sweet. The only thing I dont like about it is the rear end. Looks like they started with a Firebird or something and molded it to look like a 4th gen (4th gen taillights and 4th gen headlights and nose). I like the motor. I think the interior is awesome. I would have gone with a different color scheme (interior and exterior). I like the front, but I dont like how curved the rear end is.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 6
From: Rowlett, TX
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt, 3.45
The dash is kinda fugly and so is the body, but the interior is sweet, and i really like the door handles.
EDIT: Wow, I just noticed the totota badge on the nose. Now thats ghey...
EDIT: Wow, I just noticed the totota badge on the nose. Now thats ghey...
Last edited by Ward; 01-15-2003 at 07:37 AM.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
From: Concord, NC
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: Superramed 355 w/ intercooled T72
Transmission: T56 -=- www.iroc-ss.com
Its took alot of time and money to make that car ugly. Front end is horrible, rear end is stilly. That dash is hideous.
motor looks badass and I love the seats though.
motor looks badass and I love the seats though.
#20
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,967
Likes: 0
From: Elk Grove Village, IL
Car: 1989 TransAm GTA
Engine: One sweet modified 355 TPI.
Transmission: The kind that shifts....
I think the rear would look much better with a different tail light setup, something that doesn't leave so much extra room by the tail light assembly. I don't like the nose too much, its very similar to the new Thunderbird nose, and I don't think it goes with the rest of the car well. The interior is sweet though. I could live without the dash though, maybe if it was a different combination of colors. Sweet engine though
I can see how much work went into this car, and even if I don't like the overall look I can appreciate what went into it.
I can see how much work went into this car, and even if I don't like the overall look I can appreciate what went into it.
#21
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
What took you so long to post those pictures.
I like the interior, and obviously the engine. The body work is questionable, but I like it, except for the front.
Gives me an idea though.
I like the interior, and obviously the engine. The body work is questionable, but I like it, except for the front.
Gives me an idea though.
#22
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by Jim85IROC
That thing is as queer as a 3 dollar bill.
That thing is as queer as a 3 dollar bill.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
I like the engine and the dash design. The body color is ok, but not the interior color; I think it would look a lot better if it were a darker color. The shields around the MC and heater box were probably done for practical reasons (heat from the turbo could melt the plastic), so no problems there. The body, while well done from a workmanship standpoint, doesn't really do it for me...3rd gen Camaros are so angular, and the rounded bumper cover and taillights conflict with that. I love Supra lights, but have yet to see them look good on anything but a Supra. A more modern set of wheels, preferably in an 18", would help the look.
#30
i donno its pretty kool atleast its not covered in velvet and has hydro's and huge mural of a naked chick holdign a sword on the hood... ive seen worse 3rd gens than this one...i think if he lost the chrome gas door thing and maybe graphed some some new head lights on the front like the headlights from the same car that he got those tailights off of. then it would look alot better.. i wouldnt be imbarassed(sp) to drive it
#33
Butt Fugly!!, the body is gross, dash is would be ok if it were a differant color and didn't have that huge bubble for a glove compartment, seats are sweet but I'd want them in a differant color also (can never go wrong with black leather), engine is sweet but it'd be better with bigger turbos , and what supra are those tailights from? look more like a fourth gen then a supra
#35
"Check out this TWIN TURBO supra rear lighted pretty cool 3rd Gen. Camaro! pretty cool"
Pretty cool alright!
"Looks like the award for 2nd ugliest car I've ever seen GOES TO.....;
THAT HUNK OF CRAP!! <cheering>"
Pretty cool alright!
"Looks like the award for 2nd ugliest car I've ever seen GOES TO.....;
THAT HUNK OF CRAP!! <cheering>"
#37
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 1
From: Central CA
Car: 89 Black GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Im with pretty mch everyone else. Engine and seats, two thumbs up, everything else....nah.
I want to know what kind of times it is runnin.
Brian
I want to know what kind of times it is runnin.
Brian
#39
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
From: St Catharines, ON
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
What the hell were they thinking with that front end design? Looks like ***. What an ugly, disgusting, waste of a 3rd gen piece of automotive garbage.
lol, nice engine though
lol, nice engine though
#40
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
I really love the seats though. They look comfortable too. I like the aluminum side sills. I am not keen on the stock design with the diamond treads and a picture of a horse and carriage engraved on the side.
#42
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 Anniversary Edition
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner 5-Speed
you guys all have to remember that car was built in 1992, so for a car way back in '92 it would've been impressive.
#44
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by dunerida82
Dont be jealous y'all. NONE of us have that kind of luxury in our thirdgens, and you know damned well you would trade for it!
Dont be jealous y'all. NONE of us have that kind of luxury in our thirdgens, and you know damned well you would trade for it!
Is it me or are those steering wheels just butt in anything other than a coupe or t-bucket?
#45
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: Chatt-town, TN
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: TBI 305... bah
Transmission: Slushbox 700r4
what a waste. waste of a perfectly good camaro. waste of a really nice motor. waste of some nice seats... and the only reason i would trade my car for this one would be, of course, the motor. just my thoughts!
#48
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 305 baby!!!
Transmission: stock 700r4
Is it me,or does the last 3 pics looked photoshopped??and the very last one looks like its a model on carpet meant to simulate the rocks in the 2 pics before that.I think im going to this one until substantial proof can be submitted to prove its real.atleast the exterior.