Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2002, 02:26 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Supercharged84Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Clark, NJ, exit 135
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 CID
Transmission: Beefed up 700R4
Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?

subject pretty much explains it....would you rather drop the car (mean eibach sportlines drop, no slammed camaros) or slightly raise the rear to give it a somewhat drag-ish look, like most second gens and first gens have?
Old 10-08-2002, 02:35 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
Mark A Shields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Lower it, no question.
Old 10-08-2002, 02:38 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
Freeze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austria
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4
lower
Old 10-08-2002, 02:43 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
86Street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: peoria,il,usa
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here is mine...but it is "hickish"
Attached Thumbnails Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?-ground-driveway.jpg  
Old 10-08-2002, 04:35 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Makaveli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
hickish?? looks mean as hell high like that lol no joke

i think i would rather get new gm springs if mine were sagging.. i wouldnt want lower or higher... i just like the stock stance since it is a little higher than some camaros, but i think it depends on the car. cars with 15/16" wheels and fat tires i like stockish height, but if u have 17"+ wheels with lower profiles i would rather have it slammed personal opinion, of course

:lala:
Old 10-08-2002, 05:01 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (5)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Orland Park, IL
Posts: 13,622
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
86 street....i really like your car the way it looks


do you not like your own car?
Old 10-08-2002, 05:16 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

 
85_ZED28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: St Catharines, ON
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
raise the back a bit
Old 10-08-2002, 06:06 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
igotslicksNchix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Youngstown, NY
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i'd say lower, but i like that "hickish" car as well. my buddy has a jacked up 2nd gen, looks pretty mean but i'm not big on the wide *** tires stickin out, but i'm all about tubbin' it out so they don't
Old 10-08-2002, 06:12 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
devianb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
No question, lower it. Don't raise the rear end unless you plan on drag racing on a regular basis because drag cars do not handle well on street and on curves.
Old 10-08-2002, 06:21 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
Kj Rockz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by 86Street
here is mine...but it is "hickish"



OH yeah, he has an unnessisary true dual exhauset setup.
That's the reasoning for his car sitting 14 inches off the ground.
Old 10-08-2002, 06:37 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
86Street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: peoria,il,usa
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya i do like my car...but i am just goin with what people say...thats why "hickish" in quotes...for people like kj rocks...and maybe it is unnessisary. but i like it. sounds nice and mean with the flows. and thats that. but yea i love my car. and as my friends say it looks high in pictures but in real life it is different.
Old 10-08-2002, 06:53 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
devianb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by 86Street
ya i do like my car...but i am just goin with what people say...thats why "hickish" in quotes...for people like kj rocks...and maybe it is unnessisary. but i like it. sounds nice and mean with the flows. and thats that. but yea i love my car. and as my friends say it looks high in pictures but in real life it is different.
I don't think your car has the distinguishing features that make a car a ******* car. For one, all of your wheels match, there is not a primered fender or door, and there is no confederate flag on there either. The rear wheels are definately wide, but they don't stick out past the fender well. ******* cars I see usually have the widest tire on the smallest diameter wheel possible.
Old 10-08-2002, 07:32 PM
  #13  
TGO Supporter

 
MdFormula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland; USA
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i prefer lower all the way around!

but i do agree some thirdgens look mean as heck alittle higher in the rear..

i guess it depends on what you do the most with your car...
Old 10-08-2002, 07:36 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
DISTURBthePEACE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Here and There, Kansas
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L V-6
Transmission: T-5
Drop that sucker What does a drop run for 3rd gen camaros anyways? say a 2" drop, that would put it 6" of the ground if my memory serves me correctly.
Old 10-08-2002, 07:58 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Supercharged84Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Clark, NJ, exit 135
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 CID
Transmission: Beefed up 700R4
i have eibach sportlines on the car right now and i think theyre gonna stay on...i love how it makes the car look but i also like the look of a car with a somewhat jacked up rear....and disturb - the springs are about 230 and my cars rocker panel gfx are about 6-7 inches off the ground.
Old 10-08-2002, 08:20 PM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
Anth's Iroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 IROC-Z
Engine: =350 sbc
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Do what makes you happy..........
Old 10-08-2002, 09:09 PM
  #17  
Member
 
Firechick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 84 T/A,84 Bird,85 T/A Knight Automated Roving Robot
Engine: 305 HO many mods, 151C.I.D-stock,305 TPI stock for now
Transmission: 700-R4 Turbo Hydro-Matic
raise the rear if you want a pro street look. drop the front end an inch if you want killer cornering. pontiac was going to lower the Birds an inch for better aerodynamics and cornering , but saftey standards didn't allow it.
Old 10-08-2002, 09:32 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (15)
 
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
I think they look better lowered.
Old 10-08-2002, 10:02 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
12 Sec GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: orlando
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 98 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M6
Drop it.

I run 2" drop spindles and then eibach springs.. the rears are eibachs with a few snipped coils.
Old 10-08-2002, 10:21 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Brad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: North TX
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drop it. These cars aren't running leaf springs, which means raising the rear end throws the suspension off. Our torque arm suspension wasn't desginged to have the front end so much lower than the rear, the angle of the torque arm makes a difference on traction for our cars.

86Street, your car looks good except that you are pushing the wheels out a little more than they need for the same amount of tire. I'm running 275/40's with no need for additional clearancing, so I can't imagine you having much more tread width with those wheels/tires. But that's just my opinion
Old 10-09-2002, 08:10 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
FyreLance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Huber Heights, OH
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Drop!
Old 10-09-2002, 10:43 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Gunny Highway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: The nation's capital
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by devianb
I don't think your car has the distinguishing features that make a car a ******* car. For one, all of your wheels match, there is not a primered fender or door, and there is no confederate flag on there either. The rear wheels are definately wide, but they don't stick out past the fender well. ******* cars I see usually have the widest tire on the smallest diameter wheel possible.
Confederate Flag does not equal *******:nono:
Old 10-09-2002, 11:00 AM
  #23  
Supreme Member

 
vic_V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Dixon, IL
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42
in person allens car doesn't look as bad as the pic would have you thinking as far as height is concerned. it barely higher in front than stock, rear is altough rear is about 3-4 inches higher than stock


here is my plan: lower the rs

tub the 86, try to keep it the stock height or slightly taller
Old 10-09-2002, 12:55 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
FyreLance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Huber Heights, OH
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Originally posted by Gunny Highway
Confederate Flag does not equal *******:nono:
Only rednecks say that.


Old 10-09-2002, 01:01 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
 
davecamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Bonnievillie
Engine: 3.8L
hahahahahahahahahahhaahhaha
Old 10-09-2002, 08:18 PM
  #26  
Supreme Member
 
bubbakutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wall Township, NJ
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 "1991 Z" Sport Coupe
Engine: LG4
Transmission: TH700R4
raise it up
i dont know if its the same for all of u but all of my wheels and tires are the same size. and the rear of my car is raised 1 1/2 inches, is that stock or is there like a lift on the back?
Attached Thumbnails Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?-p1010104.jpg  
Old 10-09-2002, 10:24 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member

 
Calderone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 Vette
Engine: 355/195AFR/SR/219CAM/1.6
Transmission: TH700R4/Vigilante
Axle/Gears: D44/3.45
RAISED ...PERIOD ¡¡¡¡¡¡

Look at this beatiful raised 1985 ..
im planning this look for my 82 S/E ...¡
LOL
Attached Thumbnails Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?-raised.jpg  
Old 10-09-2002, 10:49 PM
  #28  
Supreme Member
 
1982chevycamaroz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: north plainfield,nj,usa
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well dave as u see in my pics im goin for the drag racer look but it really depends on what u want to do to ur car to make it ur own uniqeness.
Attached Thumbnails Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?-dscf00821.jpg  
Old 10-10-2002, 02:49 AM
  #29  
Member

 
scrawnywhiteguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
86 street...Your car looks like it could do some damage. But as a reply to the original post...lower it
Old 10-10-2002, 02:51 AM
  #30  
Member

 
scrawnywhiteguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look at this beatiful raised 1985 ..
im planning this look for my 82 S/E ...¡
LOL
WTF?!?!?!?!?! thats horrid....
Old 10-10-2002, 03:09 AM
  #31  
Senior Member

 
zer0321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I would rather lower mine than raise it...


but I am never going to lower it because I scrape the ground with the front GFX enough already....
Old 10-10-2002, 04:58 AM
  #32  
Member
 
TTA155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lower it...maybe 1.25 - 1.5 inches with some Eibach Pro-kit springs.
Old 10-10-2002, 05:28 AM
  #33  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
robertg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2000 astro
Engine: 4.3
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 3.42 gears
i agree with brad, the coil springs weren't really designed for having the back higher than the front.

i still have the v6 spring under the front of my car, which explains how it sits. i get a lot of comments around here locally, but the handling sucks.

when i do my suspension, i may go with eibach and lower it maybe an inch at most. i have enough of a fun time getting into these cars. i don't want to make it any harder.
Attached Thumbnails Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?-camaropost.jpg  
Old 10-10-2002, 08:49 AM
  #34  
Member
 
83 MidniteZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Roswell, Georgia
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Drop that bad boy. There is nothing like cruising around country roads at high speeds and carving corners without batting an eye.
Old 10-10-2002, 10:21 AM
  #35  
Member

 
rocc4u's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 383 Miniram
Transmission: T56
Man here is a pix of my other ride. This is what I used to skate around on in High School, Thats my cousins car in the back(a$$ up).
Attached Thumbnails Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?-64loco.jpg  

Last edited by rocc4u; 10-10-2002 at 01:02 PM.
Old 10-11-2002, 12:29 PM
  #36  
Supreme Member

 
Camrs89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Pekin, IL
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Formula, 79 Trans Am, 72 LeMans
Engine: 305 TPI, 6.6, 350 Pontiac
Transmission: T5, 3 speed, TH350
Raise it and put 15x10's on the back...:hail:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ghettobird52
Tech / General Engine
16
07-05-2024 11:18 PM
TheExaminer
Cooling
26
08-26-2015 04:59 PM
jharrison5
Engine Swap
5
08-19-2015 05:53 PM
bryan623
Auto Detailing and Appearance
2
08-10-2015 11:33 AM
Kaweh
TBI
3
08-09-2015 02:54 PM



Quick Reply: Drop the car or raise the back, which one would you do?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.