Alternative Port EFI Intakes This board is for tech discussions and questions about aftermarket port EFI such as the HSR, MR, SR, BBK, FIRST, etc.

Any one consider the l31 IM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2008, 10:12 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ls six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Any one consider the l31 IM?

I was thinking of swapping the complete top end vortech heads and all and running it off the TPI computer and most of the stock harness.


The IM is an aluminum base with composit top.


Name:  wires-1.jpg
Views: 8990
Size:  154.9 KB

It uses a single large TB and the injectors are internal.

The Injectors and various sensors should be interchangable with the 90+ TPI bit's.

I'm looking for an affordable way to get past the TPI's top end limitations.



Heres some info .

http://images.search.yahoo.com/image...sigb=12u1st2ro

Last edited by ls six; 10-02-2008 at 10:16 PM.
Old 10-03-2008, 09:44 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Pocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 7,945
Received 160 Likes on 87 Posts
Car: 91 Trans Am
Engine: LSA
Transmission: T56 AWD
Axle/Gears: 8.8 4.10
Re: Any one consider the l31 IM?

You contradict yourself

Stock vortec uses a 2 piece intake:
Aluminum lower and plastic upper

Marine vortec uses 2 piece alum intake

All of the benefits you want sound more like the marine version, but even that has limitations

Exerpt from an article on them
Now lets talk performance. In my opinion, the stock L31 truck vortec (and
marine) intake manifolds are horrible for performance. The reason? When
the air comes into the intake from the throttle body, it has to make an
immediate 90 degree turn to head towards the runner inlets. Once it gets
there, it has to make nearly a 180 degree U-turn to get into the runners.

A friend of mine did a GM LT4 HOTCAM kit on his 96 GMC 1500 Vortec 5.7L. I
got his tuning done but the engine makes very little power below about
2800rpm. Whats worse is the power band falls off sharply after 5400rpm!
Fuel looks ok and I gave it as much timing as it can handle. I am convinced
the stock vortec intakes are horrible from a performance standpoint.
Regardless if you agree with his opinions, the fact remians that the intake-much like TPI- is a restriction. You can confirm this by going on any chevy truck/SUV forum and searching "vortec powerband."

Next, wiring
All sensors will NOT interchange with any TPI, infact very few of them will
A closer match would be 90-92 V6 wiring as they used the newer GM ends, but why not use the vortec wiring since you're already taking the intake

A better solution
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Something along these lines
Port injection is retained, power band is whatever intake you buy and there are multiple options, wiring can remain stock TPI if you want it to based on which TB you use and sensor arrangement, and lastly, they are cost effective with proven results

I would suggest you research ALL of the common intake swaps in this forum
Old 10-04-2008, 03:45 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ls six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Any one consider the l31 IM?

Your right about the ultimate restriction of course.

I was having computer issues so I didnt go in to detail with my thoughts on the truck vs marine IM's.

What do people use for the TB on those IM's?

The late model vortec TB looks nice and proabably out flows our stock one.

I have thought about the TBI throttle body but it looks worse than ours as far as flow area.

I have seen adaptor plates as part of EFI conversion kits that attach TBI TB's to square bore IM's but nothing for what I want to do.
Old 10-04-2008, 05:26 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Re: Any one consider the l31 IM?

Last year I did an upgrade on my 2000 Tahoe with the L31 motor. I replaced the 350 motor with a 383. There is an upgraded fuel injector assembly available that uses real fuel injectors versus the poppets valves on the factory unit. I used it.

There is also an aluminum plenum spacer available that goes between the aluminum lower intake manifold and the composite upper manifold. Gives much more plenum area and allows the air to move around much more freely. I used it.

There is a guy locally here in SoCal that opens up the throttle body and installs a new blade. He also eliminates the "flow restrictor" that is attached to the factory throttle blade. Helps things quite abit. I did that.

For my Tahoe I also went the K&N cold air intake route, cam, smog legal headers and some stealth upgrades to the exhaust system. Runs great with much more power and gets the same or better gas milage. Passes California smog to boot.

Regarding using a TPI computer and harness I guess you could but you would have to get/make wiring adaptors for the sensors and the fuel injectors. Also use a TPI distributor.

What is your goal for doing this?
Old 10-04-2008, 08:51 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
sol_searcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Any one consider the l31 IM?

Go here lots of info on l31 marine im conversion

http://www.pacificp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=317
Old 10-05-2008, 01:36 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,120
Received 428 Likes on 368 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Re: Any one consider the l31 IM?

The stock L31 intake, cam, and heads fell over on its face by 4,500 rpm in my Express van. With a ported L.I.M., ported heads, lightweight LT4 retainers and springs, and Production LT4 cam, I motored on to 5,800 rpm and could have gone higher had it not been for the black boxes 5,800 rpm restriction.

FWIW, I actually test fit a Vortec intake with a TBI distributor and it fit fine and had plenty of adjustment. I even ran the setup on a TBI ecm and modified wiring harness, on a test stand. It would run better with the TPI ecm though.

Last edited by Fast355; 10-05-2008 at 01:46 PM.
Old 10-05-2008, 07:52 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
ls six's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Any one consider the l31 IM?

Wow thanks for all the interest. I looked around the forum and didnt see any refferences to this IM.

What is your goal for doing this?
I'm just looking for a cost effective way to get past the TPI's top end limit's.

Even ported and with all the aftermarket bit's available the TPI manifold is limited by the extreme runner legnth and settups like the stealth ram seem expensive.

I have thought about using a carb type mani setup for EFI using the TPI ecu and harness but I dont know what TB to use.

A TBI throttle body will work if you drop the injectors and the TPS and IAC should work since they are all contemporary with the TPI parts. They will also have the TV linkage needed for the auto trans but they dont look they'll flow as well as the L31 TB.


Originally Posted by sol_searcher
Go here lots of info on l31 marine im conversion

http://www.pacificp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=317
Thanks I'll read up tomorow.

Originally Posted by Fast355
The stock L31 intake, cam, and heads fell over on its face by 4,500 rpm in my Express van. With a ported L.I.M., ported heads, lightweight LT4 retainers and springs, and Production LT4 cam, I motored on to 5,800 rpm and could have gone higher had it not been for the black boxes 5,800 rpm restriction.

FWIW, I actually test fit a Vortec intake with a TBI distributor and it fit fine and had plenty of adjustment. I even ran the setup on a TBI ecm and modified wiring harness, on a test stand. It would run better with the TPI ecm though.
Very good stuff there. I figured the stock IM was limited RPM wise but figured that a plenum spacer would help. It's nice to know I wont have to fab one.

I like the short runners though. Some work on the base section should give good results. Raised radiuses or even horns inside a larger plenum and relocated injectors are top of the list.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FormulasOnly
TPI
95
07-23-2018 08:47 AM
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
08-20-2017 12:16 AM
sandman92084
Tech / General Engine
13
09-12-2015 10:27 PM
L98GTA87
Electronics
8
08-25-2015 02:23 PM
84z96L31vortec
North East Region
1
08-10-2015 08:27 PM



Quick Reply: Any one consider the l31 IM?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.