Dynomax catback
03-12-2002, 09:07 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ and SJU in Philly
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynomax catback
I was just wondering if anyone has heard anything good or bad about the Dynomax catback for thirdgens. Do you think I should get it? If someone does have it, maybe I could get some input? Thanks.
~Matt
~Matt
03-12-2002, 10:23 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Chillicothe Ohio
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 RS 355/ 89 IROC Convert
Engine: Hot Cam 355/TPI 305
Transmission: All 700r4's
Yeah its a good system for the price. We have one on a 87 Z 28 and love it. For the price its the best bang for the buck. It is quiter than the flowmaster.
Brian
Brian
03-12-2002, 11:04 AM
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 385 HSR
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
I have the Dynomax Super Turbo cat-back, and it worked and sounded great behind the 305. I replaced the muffler with something a lot less restrictive (Ultra-Flo welded race muffler). 
The Hooker cat-back also has a good reputation and sound, as well as the Dynomax Ultra-Flo cat-back. I believe Random Tech has a decent cat-back too.
The Hooker cat-back also has a good reputation and sound, as well as the Dynomax Ultra-Flo cat-back. I believe Random Tech has a decent cat-back too.
03-12-2002, 11:06 AM
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
I got and I love it. I wouldn't waste my money on anything else. Almost all the other companies charge WAY too much for the exact same type of system.
My thinking has always been 'why pay more for a fancy name when you don't have to?'
AJ
My thinking has always been 'why pay more for a fancy name when you don't have to?'
AJ
03-12-2002, 11:51 AM
#6
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Appleton, WI. 54914
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: L03
Transmission: Auto
I got it cause it was the cheapest. I like it just fine, real easy to install, and sounds decent, kinda quiet though, I'd like a little more noise!
03-12-2002, 12:47 PM
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Hillsborough, NJ and SJU in Philly
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks a lot guys. I'll be ordering the dynomax catback as soon as I'm done spending my money at the spring swap-meet at Englishtown.
~Matt
~Matt
Trending Topics
03-12-2002, 12:58 PM
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: BALLSTON LAKE, NY, USA
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a dynomax system on my Blazer and one on my son's Camaro. Both have gutted cat's and the system is still quiet especially when compared to the Flowmaster on my Iroc. My only criticism is that the pipes on the Blazer only lasted 3 years. I got a new muffler under warranty but not the pipes.
03-15-2002, 01:37 PM
#9
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dynomax
i got the dynomax superturbo for my 85 camaro. its great for the price. it looks good, is easy to install, and sounds better than stock but nothing too loud. its a really good deal, go for it. i got mine for a total of just under 165 from jegs
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
