Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

ANYBODY USING THE LINGENFELTER 74219 CAM PLEASE REPLY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-19-2001, 06:46 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Matt89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Yardley, PA
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANYBODY USING THE LINGENFELTER 74219 CAM PLEASE REPLY

Lingenfelter Sales recommended this cam for
my application,1989 Tpi engine. I think it might be to much of a cam for an everyday driver. I am looking for info on this
cam as far as driveability and performance goes. Personally I think the 74211
might be a wiser choice.
Any input and advice would be greatly
apreaciated.

Here are my mods for now:
Stock L98 block (new)
AFR 190 heads
Accel intake manifold
Bosh 24Lb injectors
Comp Cams 1.52 Roller Rockers
85 Vette torque converter
SLP 1 5/8 headers
Accel Runners
Ported plenum
Stock 3.27 gears




------------------
1989 Formula 350, Crane AFPR at 48PSi, SLP Air BOX, Dynomax UltraFlow 3" Cat Back, Performance Resource Chip with 160 stat, modified MAF. 160K
on the motor. 14.08 at 96.66
Old 01-20-2001, 02:08 AM
  #2  
Moderator

iTrader: (1)
 
Kevin91Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Orange, SoCal
Posts: 10,947
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
It is a good cam, I think it'd go great with your mods. Next on your list would be a higher stall converter, like 2400 or 2800.

------------------
West Coast GM Shootout 2001!
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.25 @ 107.18 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Old 01-21-2001, 01:33 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (10)
 
MikeH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Fla
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
I think the 219 is a good cam also,a better match might be the SuperRam intake though. If you plan to stay with the Long runner setup. The 211 was designed for that application. IM not saying it wouldnt work. But the cam and intake would not be optimized for the same rev range.

Thats the way they were designed,the 219 for the SuperRam,and the 211 for the long tubes.

------------------
Black 90 IROC, L98, A4, 323 gear. SuperRamed 406 in the works!
Old 01-22-2001, 07:16 AM
  #4  
Banned

iTrader: (4)
 
HiTech5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ILL
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
The 219 cam is very versatile. It will work great for your application. The converter you're using is a higher stall unit which will match up fine to the cam.

------------------
D&Z Performance
"Putting Power to the Pavement"
Old 01-25-2001, 08:26 AM
  #5  
Member
 
Hank Brote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Duluth, GA USA
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I run a 219* and had one similar to the 211*.
I would go with the 219*..... You'll have no problems on the street with it and your performance will improve.

------------------
Hank
87'IROC Z28
Hanks 87 IROC
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
10-08-2015 01:57 AM
snakeshooter
Suspension and Chassis
11
09-10-2015 07:46 AM
rsrookie
Camaros for Sale
0
09-05-2015 07:08 PM
Kenwood
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
09-04-2015 05:50 PM
masonta
Power Adders
0
09-01-2015 06:40 PM



Quick Reply: ANYBODY USING THE LINGENFELTER 74219 CAM PLEASE REPLY



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 AM.