Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Lowering springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2009, 10:10 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gregsz-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Lowering springs

Just curious about these different springs: http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...4294925023+115
What I'm wanting to know is how much they actually lower our cars, and what are the spring rates?
Old 02-23-2009, 11:52 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
customblackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 4,649
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Car: 87 TA clone
Engine: 70/70 Turbo 5.3 LS
Transmission: bullet proof 2004R
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears
Re: Lowering springs

summits springs? lower about 1" front and rear and have rates close to the prokits.... from what ive heard (aka ppl calling summit and asking the tech) supposidly they are ebachs that dont pass final inspection.

prokits=1"drop front and rear. 714lbin front rate and 100-160lbin proggressive rear rate
sportlines= 1.7" drop front , 1.3" drop rear. 700lbin front rate/80-130lb proggressvive rear rate

hotchkins= 1"drop front and rear. rates are lower than the prokits supposidly. some say 600-650 front and who knows about the rears.
Old 02-24-2009, 01:22 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gregsz-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Re: Lowering springs

That's about all that I needed to know.
Prokit looks like the best option so far...
unless anyone knows about any springs closer to 800lbin?
Old 03-01-2009, 10:29 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
customblackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern New Jersey
Posts: 4,649
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Car: 87 TA clone
Engine: 70/70 Turbo 5.3 LS
Transmission: bullet proof 2004R
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears
Re: Lowering springs

global west sells front springs that are in the 800 range. but its just the fronts. they have 3 different types. not sure which one is above 800 but im sure at least 1 is. prob the competition, i would call them and ask.

http://www.globalwest.net/1982-02_Ca..._and_rear..htm
Old 03-01-2009, 10:50 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
1986iroc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint cloud,florida
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Iroc z
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Lowering springs

Originally Posted by gregsz-28
Just curious about these different springs: http://store.summitracing.com/egnsea...4294925023+115
What I'm wanting to know is how much they actually lower our cars, and what are the spring rates?
HOWDY!! i just recently installed eibach pro-kit on my 86 Iroc. and YES TOTALLY HAPPY!!! Like CUSTOMBLACKBIRD said with the lowering rate is acurate. make sure u get an adjustable panhard rod to go with your project. that way your rear-end is inline with the rest of your setup. IM COMPLETELY HAPPY with what i did to my Iroc. handle 100% better
Old 03-01-2009, 11:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
TGO - 10 Year Member
iTrader: (17)
 
tonys91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Rincon, Ga.
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TPI conversion.
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi 4th gen rear
Re: Lowering springs

i went with summit springs and are very satisfied with them.
Old 03-02-2009, 01:44 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gregsz-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Re: Lowering springs

Thanks for the info!
I already have an adjustable panhard rod.

Specifically what I am looking for are non-progressive rate springs, over 800lb in.
I'll give global west a call, maybe I'll be able to end my search there, but I'm not in really in any hurry.

All the eibach springs are progressive rate springs, correct?
Old 03-14-2009, 06:12 PM
  #8  
Member

iTrader: (2)
 
cookie21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Eastgate/Cincy Ohio
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Lowering springs

I went with the Tenzo R set, and Im not as happy as id like to be. My stock springs were so wore out that the "lowering sprimgs" didnt make that much diffrence at all. The car rides better but the wheel well gap pisses me off. My buddies make fun of me all the time, saying i got the "skyjacker" lowering springs for my camaro.
Old 03-16-2009, 02:08 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
1986iroc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint cloud,florida
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Iroc z
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Lowering springs

Originally Posted by cookie21
I went with the Tenzo R set, and Im not as happy as id like to be. My stock springs were so wore out that the "lowering sprimgs" didnt make that much diffrence at all. The car rides better but the wheel well gap pisses me off. My buddies make fun of me all the time, saying i got the "skyjacker" lowering springs for my camaro.
Well in my opinion the car looks pretty good. Me personally im not into low profile tires. My car looks pretty damn good with the stock p245 50 r16 on them stock rims. Yes you can notice a difference in the way it looks. When you put those skinny little tires on your car then the gap in the fender well is gonna be wider and make it look NOT so lowered. My personal opinion. get rid of those tires.
Old 03-16-2009, 03:30 PM
  #10  
TA
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Carson, CA
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '88 GTA, 90 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI, fed growth hormones
Transmission: 700r4 4u2?
Axle/Gears: 9bolt
Re: Lowering springs

Originally Posted by 1986iroc350
Well in my opinion the car looks pretty good. Me personally im not into low profile tires. My car looks pretty damn good with the stock p245 50 r16 on them stock rims. Yes you can notice a difference in the way it looks. When you put those skinny little tires on your car then the gap in the fender well is gonna be wider and make it look NOT so lowered. My personal opinion. get rid of those tires.
I totally agree with 1986IROC350, your tires just don't fill up the fender wells either up and down or front to back, they look wimpy. Options are to go with a larger diameter wheel to run the low profiles, or just ditch the super low profile tires for a regular 50 series, you will gain ground clearance and fill your fenderwells at the same time, so the car will actually look lower with beefier tires.

TA
Old 03-16-2009, 06:38 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
gregsz-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: No
Transmission: No
Axle/Gears: No
Re: Lowering springs

Originally Posted by cookie21
I went with the Tenzo R set, and Im not as happy as id like to be. My stock springs were so wore out that the "lowering sprimgs" didnt make that much diffrence at all. The car rides better but the wheel well gap pisses me off. My buddies make fun of me all the time, saying i got the "skyjacker" lowering springs for my camaro.
It looks like you should get higher profile tires, then cut the springs you have to maintain the same ride height, and that will fill the gap around the wheels better.

Car looks great though.
Old 03-16-2009, 07:14 PM
  #12  
Member

iTrader: (5)
 
Jonathan Dyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '83 Berlinetta
Engine: 383 CI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73, Eibachs, Tokiko Illuminas,
Re: Lowering springs

I went with the Eibach Sport Line and was terrified that I might hate the ride after. But I've no compaints and our roads here are total crap. Some might say that the difference in how the car looks between pro and sport is subtle but it is noticable. The sport lines give the car a more agressive stance.

Don't forget though, after lowering a car nearly 2" stock shocks won't be doing all that much. Better to upgrade to Tokikos, Bilsteins etc.

Jon
Old 03-17-2009, 04:12 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
1986iroc350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: saint cloud,florida
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Iroc z
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Lowering springs

I went with Eibach pro-kit. Lowered my car about 1 inch or so but kept the Factory tires and rims. I feel that if you are gonna have an IROC, the way to go is to have the factory rims to sport it around. Those factory rims STAND OUT ANYWHERE!! In the process of painting my car and doing upgrades i cant believe how many compliments i got on just the factory rims alone. even though the car looked like crap being primered and everything else. I got alot of compliments on the rims. Even had some guy offer me 1000.00 for the rims alone. probably should have took it but. i kept to my word that i would NOT sell them to anyone no matter the price. they are getting harder to find a decent set.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bubbajones_ya
Cooling
24
07-06-2024 08:32 PM
Lanz06
Auto Detailing and Appearance
6
09-14-2015 07:16 PM
crzycamaro86
Suspension and Chassis
2
09-12-2015 05:51 PM
Thornburg
Suspension and Chassis
6
09-12-2015 10:11 AM
lakeffect2
TPI
1
09-07-2015 03:52 PM



Quick Reply: Lowering springs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.