Aftermarket Product Review Provide questions and answers about aftermarket parts for the Third Generation F-Body.

Solid or hydraulic roller

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2008, 06:39 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
cdwood388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Solid or hydraulic roller

I am building a 434 fully forged smallblock with 10:1 compression supercomp headers afr 210 heads and a single plane intake topped off with a holley 750. The only think i can't decide is whether to run a solid or hydraulic roller. It will be street driven, but not a commuter only on the weekends if the weather is good and i have time so its not to and from work or anything.
Old 01-13-2008, 01:18 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (12)
 
QUICKCHICKEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Byhalia MS, just south of memphis
Posts: 1,416
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 6.0 LS
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

being you will see street duty i say hydro.
Old 01-13-2008, 01:29 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
85Firebird350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worcester
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Firebird T/A
Engine: 406sbc
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

I'm going to be running a 406 with 13:1 compression AFR 210's and a solid roller. Theyre not that bad on the streets if you get a good valvetrain to fgo with it. I know people who only have to adjust valve lash every year or so.
Old 01-13-2008, 05:59 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
immo2896's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

I'd be one of those 1 year guys.
Old 01-13-2008, 08:32 AM
  #5  
Banned

iTrader: (4)
 
HiTech5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ILL
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

I've been running a solid roller for the last 6 years. I do not find that I loose lash. I set the valves once a year in the spring.

I went from a HR to SR on my 383 and the motor acted like it was on nitrous above 5000! I now have a 406 with SR and the performance is outstanding.

I highly recommend using a stud girdle and the Comp Endure X lifters.

www.geocities.com/dzperf
Old 01-13-2008, 08:34 AM
  #6  
Senior Member

 
1FastZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Louisville Kentucky U.S.A.
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 86 Iroc Z
Engine: 406
Transmission: 350 Turbo
Axle/Gears: 373
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

Originally Posted by 85Firebird350
I'm going to be running a 406 with 13:1 compression AFR 210's and a solid roller. Theyre not that bad on the streets if you get a good valvetrain to fgo with it. I know people who only have to adjust valve lash every year or so.
I'd be 1 of those guys to since I got my stud girdles. I love my solid cam and wouldn't go back to anything else.
Old 01-13-2008, 09:49 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
jbenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 1,484
Received 42 Likes on 28 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 Bolt, 3.42
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

I've had both solid and hydraulic cams, which one is right for you really depends on what you want to do with the car. If its mostly a driver that won't see much track time and you don't want any extra maintenance then hyd is the way to go. If maximum performance is most important and you don't mind checking your valve lash a couple times a year then go with the solid. The solid cam will make more power and like the others have said if you have good quality valve train parts you won't have to adjust lash often. Solid cams rev quicker,higher and make more power. If you end up going with a solid cam I would recommend shaft mounted rockers, they are worth the extra cost in my opinion. I've had great luck with my solid roller and shaft mounted rockers, one of the best things I've done with my combo.
Old 01-13-2008, 10:14 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
383backinblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 2,776
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Car: '91 Camaro RS
Engine: F1R Procharged 383
Transmission: Tremec 600
Axle/Gears: moser 12 bolt, 4.11's 33 spline axl
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

i agree.........one of the best things I've ever done was go to a solid roller haha......if you want to play about 6500rpm its the only way to go......but like others have said, get good studs, good rockers and girdles if you don't have shaft rockers.
Old 01-13-2008, 11:27 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
cdwood388's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

Thanks for all the help guys, I am definately going solid roller, i was thnking about going with the lunati voodoo 2500-6800
Old 01-13-2008, 11:01 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
85Firebird350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worcester
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1984 Firebird T/A
Engine: 406sbc
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Re: Solid or hydraulic roller

I'm going with the Voodoo 60133 for my 406
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Car Audio
26
03-03-2022 05:38 PM
Agent507943
Firebirds Wanted
1
10-02-2015 07:18 AM
kkirch15
Interior
2
09-30-2015 04:44 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
09-29-2015 08:40 AM
mfp189
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
09-27-2015 09:25 AM



Quick Reply: Solid or hydraulic roller



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.