Edelbrock SDT catback.
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Edelbrock SDT catback.
Just bought the system, figured I'd give it a try. The catback only runs around $290, and in my opinion is well worth it. It's got a deep sound, and not too bad of a drone. Installation went much smoother than removal of the old system, everything clamped up and bolted up, no leaks, no problems. Only little problem was getting the tips on the tailpipes. I had to sand the inside of the tip a little to get them to fit right, but no big deal.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lNn4q4uyZpo
There's a link to a vid, so you can hear it.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lNn4q4uyZpo
There's a link to a vid, so you can hear it.
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '84 Camaro Z28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
I recently bought an edelbrock SDT catback too. Ive been really happy with it, the sound especially.
#4
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Findlay, OH USA
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Monte Carlo SS
Engine: 400 SBC
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
I'll be getting mine very soon, so that is very encouraging. Especially since that clip is of a 305.
#5
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Thanks. Yeah, I like it. What I like most is that it has a good sound to it, but doesn't sound like the everyday blowmaster that everyone and their dog has around here.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (12)
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
im not sure if my Edelbrock cat back is the same model but wait till ya put some build infront of that system. mine sounded pretty good then when i put my 10.41 comp 305 (480/480 210/220 112) motor W/headers my system REALLY came to life.
if you havent done headers yet that will greatly complement that good tone.
if you havent done headers yet that will greatly complement that good tone.
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
I'm almost positive that summit will ship worldwide.
I'm almost positive that summit will ship worldwide.
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: GTA
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: th700
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Thank you for answering.Your tips look beautifoul but the ones summit sells look horrible whats the catch?
Regards Uljas
Regards Uljas
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
thats the setup i just bought off a member on tgo.
http://s176.photobucket.com/albums/w...t=305power.flv
thats what it sounded like on 1meanz's car
I cant wait to rip off my new cars flowmaster rear kit and install this one. I like the whole "hidden tip" instead of massive 3inch chrome tips on a 84 trans am.
#14
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro Iroc-Z
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.42 7.625 10 bolt
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
I have the Edelbrock SDT exhuast on my car and when i had a mild 350 and 700r4 i loved it. It had a nice deep mellow tone, but last year i changed the motor to something a little more aggressive and put a th-350 in the car and now i cant stand it.. I cruise at 2700 so its making some pretty good noise at that point and it feels like its beating my ear drums in. That prolly means im getting old, but just a word to the wise, the exhuast is pretty loud with a larger cam.
#15
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Mirada, California
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
It sounds an aweful lot like my Edelbrock RPM Catback... once I find my sound clip, I will post it up. But very nice sound on yours!!
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Quick Edelbrock!! Run! catch up! Hurry! copy flowmasters technology and market it as your own! because we cant be beaten in flow and performance by a company thats the size of a garage!!! sorry guys but were do you think Edlebrock got there " Sound deflection technology" from? you guys have just been had by college kids with marketing degrees!
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
why do you think "everyone" uses flowmaster? cuz they have the best flow numbers, thats why,thats also the reason Edelbrock copied Flowmaster
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Quick Edelbrock!! Run! catch up! Hurry! copy flowmasters technology and market it as your own! because we cant be beaten in flow and performance by a company thats the size of a garage!!! sorry guys but were do you think Edlebrock got there " Sound deflection technology" from? you guys have just been had by college kids with marketing degrees!
Actually it sounds much different then a flowmaster, which I'm happy about.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Quick Edelbrock!! Run! catch up! Hurry! copy flowmasters technology and market it as your own! because we cant be beaten in flow and performance by a company thats the size of a garage!!! sorry guys but were do you think Edlebrock got there " Sound deflection technology" from? you guys have just been had by college kids with marketing degrees!
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
sound is obviously a matter of opion,and ya, I did say flow and performance, cuz flow measured in just CFM is not the only factor in a performance exuast, there`s also pulse flow, meaning the one pulse actually helps create a "pull" to help pull the next one out. I like the "Rap" that flowmasters has, either way, go to carcfaft and look up the performance numbers, nuff said, still cant out perform them, cuz they can`t make a exact copy till the patent runs out!
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Okay we will talk performance then...
The results in HP order:
1.Flowtech Warlock (open) 374.2 hp/ 333.1 tq
2.Bassani Real Street 373.7 hp/ 333.8 tq
3.Hooker Maxflow 373.5 hp/ 333 tq
4.Borla XS 373.3 hp/ 332.6 tq
5.Magnaflow 372.8 / 332.5 tq
6.MAC 372.3 hp / 331.5 tq
7.Flowtech Afterburner 372.3 hp/ 330.1 tq
8.Hooker Aerochamber 372.1 hp/ 330.4 tq
9.Bassani 372 hp/ 333.5 tq
10.Spintech 371.6 hp/ 332.2 tq
11.Edelbrock Performer RPM 370.9 hp / 331.3 tq
12.Borla XR1 370 hp/ 334 tq
13.Flowtech Terminator 369.5 hp / 331.3 tq
14.Dynomax Ultra Flo 369.4 / 333.2 tq
15.Flowmaster 369.4 hp / 331.8 tq
16.Flowtech Warlock 366.3 hp / 325.3 tq
17.No muffs 365.2 hp / 330.1 tq
Sound Off in Quietest to Loudest (Decibels):
1.Borla XS, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 110db at WOT.
2.Hooker Maxflow, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
3.Magnaflow, 82db at idle, 91 at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
4.Flowmaster, 82db at idle, 93 at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
5.Flowtech Warlock, 83db at idle, 92 at 2,000 rpm, 112db at WOT.
6.Dynomax UltraFlo, 83db at idle, 94 at 2,000 rpm, 113db at WOT.
7.Borla XR1, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
8.Bassani Street, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
9.Edelbrock RPM, 84db at idle, 93db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
10.Bassani Real Street, 84db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
11.Flowtech Afterburner, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
12.Flowtech Terminator, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
13.Hooker Aerochamber, 87db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
14.SpinTech, 87db at idle, 97db at 2,000 rpm, 116db at WOT.
15.MAC, 87db at idle, 98db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
16.No Muffler, 91db at idle, 103db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
granted no flowmasters were in there, but edelbrock was...so if what you say is true......edelbrock/flowmaster really dont flow well.....
The results in HP order:
1.Flowtech Warlock (open) 374.2 hp/ 333.1 tq
2.Bassani Real Street 373.7 hp/ 333.8 tq
3.Hooker Maxflow 373.5 hp/ 333 tq
4.Borla XS 373.3 hp/ 332.6 tq
5.Magnaflow 372.8 / 332.5 tq
6.MAC 372.3 hp / 331.5 tq
7.Flowtech Afterburner 372.3 hp/ 330.1 tq
8.Hooker Aerochamber 372.1 hp/ 330.4 tq
9.Bassani 372 hp/ 333.5 tq
10.Spintech 371.6 hp/ 332.2 tq
11.Edelbrock Performer RPM 370.9 hp / 331.3 tq
12.Borla XR1 370 hp/ 334 tq
13.Flowtech Terminator 369.5 hp / 331.3 tq
14.Dynomax Ultra Flo 369.4 / 333.2 tq
15.Flowmaster 369.4 hp / 331.8 tq
16.Flowtech Warlock 366.3 hp / 325.3 tq
17.No muffs 365.2 hp / 330.1 tq
Sound Off in Quietest to Loudest (Decibels):
1.Borla XS, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 110db at WOT.
2.Hooker Maxflow, 80db at idle, 90db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
3.Magnaflow, 82db at idle, 91 at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
4.Flowmaster, 82db at idle, 93 at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
5.Flowtech Warlock, 83db at idle, 92 at 2,000 rpm, 112db at WOT.
6.Dynomax UltraFlo, 83db at idle, 94 at 2,000 rpm, 113db at WOT.
7.Borla XR1, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
8.Bassani Street, 83db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, 120db at WOT.
9.Edelbrock RPM, 84db at idle, 93db at 2,000 rpm, 118db at WOT.
10.Bassani Real Street, 84db at idle, 96db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
11.Flowtech Afterburner, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 115db at WOT.
12.Flowtech Terminator, 86db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
13.Hooker Aerochamber, 87db at idle, 94db at 2,000 rpm, 114db at WOT.
14.SpinTech, 87db at idle, 97db at 2,000 rpm, 116db at WOT.
15.MAC, 87db at idle, 98db at 2,000 rpm, 119db at WOT.
16.No Muffler, 91db at idle, 103db at 2,000 rpm, MAX. (120+db).
granted no flowmasters were in there, but edelbrock was...so if what you say is true......edelbrock/flowmaster really dont flow well.....
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
sound is obviously a matter of opion,and ya, I did say flow and performance, cuz flow measured in just CFM is not the only factor in a performance exuast, there`s also pulse flow, meaning the one pulse actually helps create a "pull" to help pull the next one out. I like the "Rap" that flowmasters has, either way, go to carcfaft and look up the performance numbers, nuff said, still cant out perform them, cuz they can`t make a exact copy till the patent runs out!
#25
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
I see that the magnaflow flows 35 more CFM than the flowmaster listed, well that just proves my point, I had magna flow on my car first and it sucked! it was a nite and day difference, the flowmaster could be felt in the seat of the pants, so I gave the magna to my friend and he put it on his z-24.
#28
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
I noticed that the flowmaster was the only system other than the magnaflow that did`nt list it`s model, or series, do you know what they used for the test cuz some flowmasters out perform other flowmasters!
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (11)
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
No I do not....but then again Dynomax does sell different mufflers too...I am sure though that most street driven cars wont have a racing muffler on there...unless they are trying to attract attention to themselves
whatever the case may be, according to you edelbrock stole flowmasters technology so edelbrock's performance will be the same.....and therefore isnt the best flowing muffler....thank you and good night
whatever the case may be, according to you edelbrock stole flowmasters technology so edelbrock's performance will be the same.....and therefore isnt the best flowing muffler....thank you and good night
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
also, another question is, was the test done on a car using duals or single? cuz that is a factor also, as we have singles and that would null and void that test as a comparison to our cars, also, was this a test of strictly mufflers, or whole systems? and I realize that were not talking race mufflers, but the 80 series womps all the other series made by flowmaster as far as perf. goes.
Last edited by hattmuber; 10-11-2007 at 07:43 PM. Reason: for got a point
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2012 Ram express
Engine: 5.7 hemi
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 3.55
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
hey how about this just end this everyone has there opinions you either love or hate flowmasters they have been tested time and time again and are usually the lowest flowing muffler. this post was about how this guy was happy with edelbrock and sharing his exhaust with others not for you to come on this post spreading your bullshit if you like flowmasters so much make a thread about how there great and see how many people agree with u
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91`camaro RS
Engine: 5.7l vortec T.B.I.
Transmission: STS 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9bolt-3.27
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
did`nt relly want to stand on a podium and say that flowmaster was nessicarily THE best, just wanted to say to that gentlemen whom was saying how great his Edlebrock was and how $h!tty flowmaster was, that imitation is the ultimate form of flattery, bashing was not instigated by me! it was started by the thread starter!
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
Most average thirdgen owners dont care about the flow numbers if you ask me the two most popular catbacks are the edelbrock and hooker both sound amazing and not like a shitty dumptruck like flowmaster. And as for flowmaster flowing so great a dynomax ultra flo muffler will outflow any of the chambered junkmaster mufflers
The car came with a flowmaster.....ewwwww made the 305 sounds like a pissed off weedeater under water!!!!!
#34
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Mirada, California
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
When I got my car, it came with a stock (replacement) muffler. I changed it to a flowmaster 80 within 3 days of buying the car.
5 Years later, I took off the 80 and put on the RPM and sold the flowmaster on ebay.
Now, 2 yrs later, I love the RPM and cant wait until the L98 is in the car (will sound even more killer than with the LO3).
I didn't care about flow or performance, I just switched to the RPM based completely on the fact that I liked the tone better. The flowmaster was (a little) louder, but the RPM is deeper and has more of a true muscle car sound than the Flowmaster did.
I am not saying one is better than the other, it is just my personal preferance.
5 Years later, I took off the 80 and put on the RPM and sold the flowmaster on ebay.
Now, 2 yrs later, I love the RPM and cant wait until the L98 is in the car (will sound even more killer than with the LO3).
I didn't care about flow or performance, I just switched to the RPM based completely on the fact that I liked the tone better. The flowmaster was (a little) louder, but the RPM is deeper and has more of a true muscle car sound than the Flowmaster did.
I am not saying one is better than the other, it is just my personal preferance.
#35
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Berlin, WI
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Trans Am
Engine: 383 Stealth Ram
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42/10 bolt
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
I am glad you like you Edlebrock. I would gladly try one of their mufflers on my car. Right now I have the single exit Flowmaster. I can't say I don't like it, and it sounded decent with the stock 305 TPI too, Though the factory muffler (stock from GM) was deaper sounding....and about the same volume (I actually was pulled over because of my factory exhaust, and it only had 30k on it at the time. The cop didn't believe me, so I suggested he crawl under the car and look at the GM part number on the muffler!). Anyways, now that I am running headers and a motor with some power, I would like to find something more quite. Anyone have any ideas on a muffler I can swap in?
#36
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Mirada, California
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: Edelbrock SDT catback.
There may be others also, but Dynomax is the most mellow that I have heard
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pac J
Tech / General Engine
3
05-17-2020 10:44 AM
efiguy
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-27-2015 01:30 PM
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-25-2015 04:47 AM