Anyone see the new chevy high performance
#51
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Just to add fuel the fire I'm perfectly happy with the two sets of TES headers that I have, one on my old 86 IROC and one on my 87Z.
Like I mentioned earlier, there is a mag comparo article that supposedly showed that the TES headers made more power than the 1 5/8 SLP headers. But the guy who was going to post a scan of it disappeared from the boards... Even if the 1 5/8 SLPs make more power they're not worth the nearly double the price. At least not to me anyway...
------------------
Ray87Z
-Vortec headed 350.
86 IROC w/ a cammed 305 TPI.
Formerly Ray86IROC.
www.inter-scape.com/Ray
Like I mentioned earlier, there is a mag comparo article that supposedly showed that the TES headers made more power than the 1 5/8 SLP headers. But the guy who was going to post a scan of it disappeared from the boards... Even if the 1 5/8 SLPs make more power they're not worth the nearly double the price. At least not to me anyway...
------------------
Ray87Z
-Vortec headed 350.
86 IROC w/ a cammed 305 TPI.
Formerly Ray86IROC.
www.inter-scape.com/Ray
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hard hittin' New Britain, CT USA
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
I saw a pair of TES headers. The craftsmanship looked kinda shoddy. Don't know how they actually perform though. I have set of Hookers that I am very happy with. Good headers, good price.
------------------
"Though I cruise through the valley of Rice I shall fear no turbo, for torque art with me."
--Cullan Hooley
-----
1985 IROC-Z w/T-tops, 305 out and 350 L98 TPI engine in, Hooker Super Comp Headers, 3" Hooker Super Comp Cat-Back, Dropped Cat, Rebuilt TH700R4 with Shift kit, 2,800RPM Torque Converter, 3.73 Richmond gears, Auburn differential, Accell SuperCoil, Accell 8mm racing wires, BBK AFPR, Homemade Ram-Air (thanks to Andris Skulte), MAF screens removed, Dropped A/C, Dropped A.I.R, TB coolant bypass, Hurst Dual-Gate Shifter, SLP Air Foil, K&N filters, Holley performance fuel pump, Spohn Subframe Connectors, Re-located Spohn Lower Control arms, and more to come.
------------------
"Though I cruise through the valley of Rice I shall fear no turbo, for torque art with me."
--Cullan Hooley
-----
1985 IROC-Z w/T-tops, 305 out and 350 L98 TPI engine in, Hooker Super Comp Headers, 3" Hooker Super Comp Cat-Back, Dropped Cat, Rebuilt TH700R4 with Shift kit, 2,800RPM Torque Converter, 3.73 Richmond gears, Auburn differential, Accell SuperCoil, Accell 8mm racing wires, BBK AFPR, Homemade Ram-Air (thanks to Andris Skulte), MAF screens removed, Dropped A/C, Dropped A.I.R, TB coolant bypass, Hurst Dual-Gate Shifter, SLP Air Foil, K&N filters, Holley performance fuel pump, Spohn Subframe Connectors, Re-located Spohn Lower Control arms, and more to come.
#53
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
The SLP headers are not double the price of the Edelbrocks. I have had both SLP and Edelbrock. NEITHER headers are exactly great quality.
------------------
92Z28
89GTA
------------------
92Z28
89GTA
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: cary,nc,usa
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
has anyone taken a close look atpage 62? a few of the pictures are developed backwards. Talk about poor editing.
------------------
'86 IROC 5-speed
305 LG4
edelbrock performer rpm intake
edelbrock 600 cfm carb
msd pro billet hei distributer
'95 3.23 rearend
hotchkis rear suspension
PST front polygraphite suspension
------------------
'86 IROC 5-speed
305 LG4
edelbrock performer rpm intake
edelbrock 600 cfm carb
msd pro billet hei distributer
'95 3.23 rearend
hotchkis rear suspension
PST front polygraphite suspension
#55
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
i havent looked but i know in past issues they have shown 69 camaros with the drivers seat on the right hehe. someone thought it was a rare european camaro, but it was really just a mis-developed pic. lol. let's not knock every flaw in the mag, we have to give props where props are due and the fact is they called our cars what we have known all along, the best value for their money. their are a lot of similar issues like this one, and they are always putting irocs in their reader's rides section. i dont know about you guys, but i get sick of seeing: 69 camaro, 70 chevelle, 69 camaro, 66 malibu, 69 camaro, and so forth, and as long as they continue to bring me my third gens, i will buy their mags. period.
#56
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by MikeH:
Kevin...You have a good setup,you wouldnt be running the times in your signature,if you didnt. IM not saying that Edelbrock headers are going to make more power than 1 3/4 SLPs. I really dont care to debate that any further. The SLPs will flow more and make more topend power. Even though that doesnt tell the whole story. Its your car and you can run whatever you want,thats none of my concern. The thing is you keep bashing the Edelbrocks,and I know them to be a good header system. Ive used a few different brands over the years and they really are a good street header system for these cars.
Except for the cheap paper head flange gaskets they come with. Ive had zero problems with them.
</font>
Kevin...You have a good setup,you wouldnt be running the times in your signature,if you didnt. IM not saying that Edelbrock headers are going to make more power than 1 3/4 SLPs. I really dont care to debate that any further. The SLPs will flow more and make more topend power. Even though that doesnt tell the whole story. Its your car and you can run whatever you want,thats none of my concern. The thing is you keep bashing the Edelbrocks,and I know them to be a good header system. Ive used a few different brands over the years and they really are a good street header system for these cars.
Except for the cheap paper head flange gaskets they come with. Ive had zero problems with them.
</font>
You may like them, but I have not heard one person who switched from Edelbrock's to SLP's and then complained they like the Edelbrock's better. I think they're worth the extra cost, and with the GP going on now, they're not as expensive.
#57
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Lakewood, ca. USA
Posts: 2,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the reason all of the mags seem to use Edelbrock headers for so many of their build ups has absolutely nothing to do with whether they are any good or not. I'm sure the mags get the headers and intake manifolds free for "promotional considerations." How many build ups have you seen in any mag that use something other than Edelbrock headers and intake manifolds?
#59
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: selden ny
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Kevin91Z:
Wow, are you clueless. Edelbrock headers suck. They may be a good match for a stock 350, but for anything making power, they are a restriction. Larger engines making more power will expel more hot exhaust. That hot exhaust takes up space. It needs to go somewhere. It'll be a lot happier in a large tube than in a small one. SLP 1 3/4" headers are great. I gained 37 TQ and 35 HP at the rear wheels when I installed mine.</font>
Wow, are you clueless. Edelbrock headers suck. They may be a good match for a stock 350, but for anything making power, they are a restriction. Larger engines making more power will expel more hot exhaust. That hot exhaust takes up space. It needs to go somewhere. It'll be a lot happier in a large tube than in a small one. SLP 1 3/4" headers are great. I gained 37 TQ and 35 HP at the rear wheels when I installed mine.</font>
#60
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Blackstone,Mass
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by iroc5speed:
has anyone taken a close look atpage 62? a few of the pictures are developed backwards. Talk about poor editing.
</font>
has anyone taken a close look atpage 62? a few of the pictures are developed backwards. Talk about poor editing.
</font>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post