Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Horsepower limitations of this exhaust...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2005, 03:26 PM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Fastmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Port Orange Florida
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 350 CI Tuned Port
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3:45
Horsepower limitations of this exhaust...

Does anyone have an educated (not a wild) guess as to the horsepower limitations of a set of Hooker 2055s flowing into a Hooker 3" catback on a 400 CI engine?
Old 12-31-2005, 03:32 PM
  #2  
TGO Supporter

 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
You'd probably be good to 400hp or so, but whats the rest of the engine built like? Are you using a cat?
Old 12-31-2005, 04:47 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
 
Fastmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Port Orange Florida
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 350 CI Tuned Port
Transmission: Automatic
Axle/Gears: 3:45
The rest

The rest of the motor is capable of considerably more than 400 HP at the crank but I hate to spend money if I dont have to. The 400 CI Bowtie short block is built strong and topped with AFR 210s and a solid roller 234/244 550 lift camshaft.
My 350 currently has a long runner setup on it but I plan to top the 400 with a stealth ram and a 58mm TB when I install it.
I am sure it would love to have 1 3/4 long tubes and a 4" catback on it but that is gonna be another grand or so to put together.
I also am not excited about the problems associated with long tubes and the Hooker setup is basically brand new. I do have a random tech cat. on it. Options??? Current setup OK for now??? Hp losses with it???
Thanks,
Roy
Old 12-31-2005, 04:50 PM
  #4  
TGO Supporter

 
Air_Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
It will work just fine with your motor, you just won't be making the most possible power from it. It should work for you just fine though.
Old 12-31-2005, 06:10 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Re: The rest

Originally posted by Fastmax
The rest of the motor is capable of considerably more than 400 HP at the crank but I hate to spend money if I dont have to. The 400 CI Bowtie short block is built strong and topped with AFR 210s and a solid roller 234/244 550 lift camshaft.
My 350 currently has a long runner setup on it but I plan to top the 400 with a stealth ram and a 58mm TB when I install it.
I am sure it would love to have 1 3/4 long tubes and a 4" catback on it but that is gonna be another grand or so to put together.
I also am not excited about the problems associated with long tubes and the Hooker setup is basically brand new. I do have a random tech cat. on it. Options??? Current setup OK for now??? Hp losses with it???
Thanks,
Roy
With your setup you should probably be looking at a dual 3" setup.
Old 01-01-2006, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 6,859
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Here is a chart I have copied from one of the muffler companies. What is between the Hooker headers and the cat-back? Anyways going by the chart your 400 would be best served by a 3 1/2" cat back. Alex here locally is going with the Mufflex 4" catback with his 400 bombshell.
Attached Thumbnails Horsepower limitations of this exhaust...-dynomax-pipe-diameter.jpg  

Last edited by 1989GTATransAm; 01-01-2006 at 11:20 AM.
Old 01-01-2006, 12:12 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
jbenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 1,481
Received 42 Likes on 28 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 Bolt, 3.42
A couple of years ago I was running low 12's with my 383, my combo has changed(cam swap and head porting) since then but its similar to whats in my signature. I was using Hedman LT's, custom bent 2 1/2 ypipe, 3in flowmaster catback. I would run .2-.3 sec faster with open headers vs. through the 3in exhaust. Once I went with the dual 3in exhaust I haven't seen any difference in performance through the exhaust vs. open headers. I would guess at your power level you might lose 20-40HP with your headers and cat back. Your current setup is fine but won't make the most power possible.
Old 01-01-2006, 03:21 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
unknown_host's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 3,245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 Iroc Z L98
Originally posted by 1989GTATransAm
Here is a chart I have copied from one of the muffler companies. What is between the Hooker headers and the cat-back? Anyways going by the chart your 400 would be best served by a 3 1/2" cat back. Alex here locally is going with the Mufflex 4" catback with his 400 bombshell.
With AFR 210's, a solid roller camshaft and big displacement, he should be between the bottom two boxes on the chart. I would say dual 3" all the way.

That chart comes up on this forum all the time, I really don't like it. You cannot judge every engine by displacement alone. I have worked on 350ci motors that made 550 horsepower naturally aspirated turning 7500 rpm. Where is that on the chart ?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ed1LE
Suspension and Chassis
8
09-30-2018 09:14 AM
jrdturbo
Firebirds for Sale
26
03-31-2016 02:58 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
10-03-2015 03:46 PM
drumstixer
Body
5
09-29-2015 03:02 PM
UltRoadWarrior9
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
09-02-2015 08:24 PM



Quick Reply: Horsepower limitations of this exhaust...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.