V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2003, 10:43 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
spjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6

can somone out there tell me if there is someone out there with a Calif smoge leagel turbo or supercharger kit for a 88 2.8 V6? I can't seam to find anything on the older cars. Thanks
spjim is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 10:56 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

 
89V6FBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UCIrvine or SFV, CA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LS1 - 346 ci
Transmission: 4L60E
Please read the sticky at the top.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=171305
Right now headers from Pacesetter are being cleared for CARB. That's probably the best you can do. Otherwise we're SOL because any power adder will have to be custom, and that will not pass smog.
89V6FBIRD is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 11:10 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
spjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about swaping the 2.8 for the 3.8 turbo?
spjim is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 11:35 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
It's a totally different mounting, block, tranny, everything, even the ECU.

Vortex and I are working on a turbo kit for your vehicle... unfortunately, I have no idea how to go about getting it smog legal.

That's if I even can, since it requires removal of the smog pump... but then, I don't believe all the 2.8's came with smog pumps...
Doward is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 01:08 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Doward
It's a totally different mounting, block, tranny, everything, even the ECU.

not sure if the V6 and V8 xmember is the same but the buick motor used the V6 mounting holes already drilled into the V8 crossmember. Other than that, yeah EVERYTHING is different lol
fly89gta is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 04:44 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Originally posted by 89V6FBIRD
Right now headers from Pacesetter are being cleared for CARB.
Is this correct? I thought Pacesetter still needed a test car to route the pipes? Did that already happen and they are being CARB approved?
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 07:41 PM
  #7  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes Fageol Superchargers in EL cajon California makes a supercharger kit that fits the gm 2.8 v6 and is smog legal. If you want Marks phone number I'll go grab it. Its isnt made for mpfi , although he did used to make mpfi 2.8 supercharger kits, If you have the cash he will make it. He does still have the basic 2.8 tbi and carb kits.
614Streets is offline  
Old 09-28-2003, 08:18 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Well, that's news to me. At the beginning of the summer I would have been very interested in a supercharger kit. Unfortunately I spent all my money.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 10:55 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
BitchinRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Modesto, CA USA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
614Streets,

Whats the number?????? Even if all he has is the SC I will work on making custom brakets and stuff. I'm just not sure what size SC to use. I mainly want to improve low end tourqe.
BitchinRS is offline  
Old 09-30-2003, 10:58 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I emailed the guy a couple of days ago and haven't heard back from him yet.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 06:31 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Here is what I heard back from Fageol superchargers for those who are interested:

"The only 2.8 MPFI we made anything for was the Fiero. It had steel heads and we made a throttle body injection system and ran it with stock ECM with our chip. The basic S-10 kit will cost you $1250. It is hard to estimate fabrication costs to covert it to fit your vehicle. The installation involves removing intake manifold and installing supercharger intake manifold assembly and AC/ALT brackets. Call me at 619 447-1092 and I'll be happy to discuss it with you."

Is the Fiero engine the same as ours? That would make it easier if it was. Then he can probably do one up for someone. I'll inquire further when I get some money.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 06:57 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
BitchinRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Modesto, CA USA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The the fiero engines are basicly FWD engines. So no there are not the same, but it would most likely work with some fugging around.

it sounds like the only SC he has is the roots type. Now lets see if I can spell... I'm looking for a centerfugal type SC. The roots type are cool and all, but major PITA to trick the EPA ****'s with one. All though they do have thier advantages. I basicly want to make a setup that I can pull off my car every 2 years with minamal hassle and go pass the smog test with. Changing intake manifolds wont be an quick swap.

This is why I kept my original intake ducting. The they wont let me pass a smog test with my CIA setup. Just swap back to original coffe can style intake and they leave me alone for another 2 years.
BitchinRS is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 06:59 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
BitchinRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Modesto, CA USA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The other problem is our cars are MPFI / TPI . His setup is for TBI. So it may not work with out some major reworking.
BitchinRS is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 07:50 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I understood that he said the Fiero setup was MPFI. They have TBI setups for 2.8 blazers. But even if the Fiero engine was FWD, would that mean the intake was different?
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 09:49 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Someone should help out Mark over at Fageolsuperchargers.com I mean for a product name like that to have a 99 cent 2nd grade html page, is not good for business. If they can't even afford to put up a decent $5 web page, how can you trust them with $1300. I wonder if they even make their products or its all a front for someone else???

A company without a good web page looks cheap, fake and might as well be on yahoo.

Matt
Gumby is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 10:33 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Ask 614Streets about the company. Maybe he knows he knows if they have credibility. Mark did send me some drawings, so maybe that means something. But even if they do have a $.02 web page, if they make a SC for the 2.8 for a "reasonable" price, then I'll buy it.

Besides, maybe this company deals mostly in local business. I mean, I haven't seen Doward's super web page for his turbo kit company.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 10:42 PM
  #17  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gumby the Fageol family used to make trucks and buses, outboard boat engines , they were big. Now Mark runs the sho which his father ray used to own. I think its tough for mark to get all these emails he gets and have almost nobody go through with it. They make blower kits for harleys , full custom set ups , the toyota 22r , the gm 2.8. His blowers and company are well documented and are even in the book street supercharging.

If people would read what I type maybe some of you would understand that the GM 2.8 kit was 50 state emisions legal. It is crazy to see the gm 2.8 manifold. It features and egr passage inside the lower manifold and the egr mountson the tbi or carb top. It really is a magnificent blower kit. Of course there are ways to fabricate a centrifugal blower with tubing and a bracket but for the gm 2.8 v6 the roots blower will be the best power adder for it adds power linear with rpm and torque is improved much better than in another application.

I just had my Fageol rebuilt and even though I have an s10 and tbi it would be easy to go to mpfi with it. I added a pop off valve on mine which required a spacer between the manifold and supercharger but now you can see how easy mpfi would be with a spacer like this.









Also rortwein@comcast.net has a NOS B&M 2.8 , 3.1 , 3.4 blower kit for sale. You have to get creative but why not you have nothing to loose and a hell of alot less work than a turbo.



614Streets is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 10:50 PM
  #18  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also if for some reason you dont like the gm tbi(?) you have other options . I was looking into this


http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33558
. Imagine that on top of a blower!

I almost have all my fabrication done. You guys wont belive my set up when you see it.
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 10:58 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member

 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Its no big deal. Just looks kind of crappy when a company can not even "afford" [ I assume afford as it all a matter of money] a decent web page with product info pics and more. It is a fair price for the asking it just makes me wonder. When I goto buy computer parts or most things off the web, the first thing I do is check out the webpage. A webpage is like the front office. If you walked off the street into the front office and all they had was a lawn chair and a 8in B&W TV, with some fat guy eating nacho's, you will most likley go else where.


So whats up with your pop off valve??? what that for? Like a BOV or an anti backfire thingy??? Looks very interesting. Post more pics if you wish.


Matt
Gumby is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 11:08 PM
  #20  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tag proves its emissions legal
Attached Thumbnails turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6-fageoloelegal.jpg  
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 11:16 PM
  #21  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matt I need the pop off for this, I am running nitrous with the tbi commander 950 stand alone with tech edge v 2.0 wide band and the fageol on a 2.8 with l249f forged pistons and a new block I built with a int balance crank and hastings gapped rings at .020 tops and .025 seconds.

The pop off will prevent damage to the blower if the nitrous backfires inside the manifold.


Note the fageol normally does not sit on this spacer(will clear stock hoods from fageol) and I am fabing mine up according to my specs and how I want it laid out. Also not Fageol does supply both carb or tbi tops , I choose to make my own to have the tbi inline with the blowers inlet and I am not running it with the egr like last year.
Attached Thumbnails turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6-fageolnitrous.jpg  
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-03-2003, 11:33 PM
  #22  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lastly this is how low it sits normally on the 2.8 application http://614streets.com/rebuiltkf2.jpg
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-05-2003, 02:59 PM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
88camarov6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 87 Camaro Vert
Engine: Cammed LT1
Transmission: T-5
What kind of power are you expecting to make?
88camarov6 is offline  
Old 10-05-2003, 11:28 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i want one! 614, you mentioned the tbi setup...you mean a tb like the one pictured above? would there be any way to keep the computer and that sort of stuff or not?
AM91Camaro_RS is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 12:43 AM
  #25  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
614Streets: So I assume some sort of intake system sits on top of the blower where those studs are sticking out? What does that look like?
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 07:42 AM
  #26  
Senior Member

 
Y2KFirehawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 00 T/A Firehawk
Engine: 346ci LS1
Transmission: MN6
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LSD
Wow, this topic is looking quite interesting! We've got this and Doward going! W00T!
Y2KFirehawk is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 10:55 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
BitchinRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Modesto, CA USA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wanted to go with a centrifugal vs. the rotts type becuase The TBI setup would require me to either figure out how to drive the injectors. Or to do it with MPFI I would have to drill and tap the manifold and make a cusotm fuel rail. I want to keep fabricating to as little as possible.

I do understand the benifits of the roots type, but don't have much free time for a bunch custom fab.

As far as the CARB # isn't that just for the original application it was desgined for (Chevy s-10), and if it is modified is no longer good?
BitchinRS is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 05:26 PM
  #28  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supercharger Fabrication completed

The Fageol supercharger kit made for the Iron head 2.8 v6 has a low profile manifold that allows it to clear stock hoods. Because of this the manifold has no provision for any pop off plate whatsoever. Being the the 60 degree v6 is so narrow , this manifold is already extended in its design to allow for the long and narrow extruded max 25 Fageol supercharger and therefore the front features the thermostat mount as well as three thermocouple bosses for various sensors.

The manifold also features a 50 state legal egr passage system which runs under the plenum area. Because of these features no extra space is available anywhere for a pop off. Under the normal usage of the supercharger kit a pop off is not nessesary. Reasons for this include the serpentine belt slipping if a backfire were to occour and moderate boost levels.

In my circumstance the supercharger will be run at higher boost levels and will also be aided with the wet 5153 tbi nos nitrous system.

I felt it nessesary to provide a escape path for the air to travel in the event that a backfire should occour. The smallest BDS backfire plate kit part number BDS-8026AK was aquired from Good Vibrations Motorsports in Whittier Califorina(1-562-945-7669) www.dragparts.com .

The fortal and 6061 aluminum used for the project was aquired from WWW.EBAY.COM and from sellers sciparts and speedymetals. The fortal bar just happened to be the right sized scrap which I had actually purchased for the Novas front and rear resevior Wet intercooler project , but oddly it ended up being just right to pursue the project.

The other aluminum I used was 6061 1/4" thick.

I first had the grueling task of cutting through the solid fortal slab with non other than a drill press to initiate the saw entry , then finished of with a skillsaw as well as a sawzall. Ironically despite many hours of cutting neither saws ruined a single blade. I am definately having the Nova intercooler water jet cut professionally but for this project the end results wre good and kept cost to a minimum.

The top half of the induction uses a holley tbi 670 cfm unit with a 5153 nos plate sitting on top of a 670 to 4 barrell holley adapter. The holley adapter sits on a fabricated 1/4" thick piece of 6061 aluminum rounding out the upper induction.

Below is where things got tricky. The stock fageol series superchargers mount with studs that are screwed into the case just adjecent to the case outlet. Stock studs protrude through the lower manifold and are secured with special nuts from the underside. Some of the studs because of their proximity to the lower manifold plenum protrude into the actual area where boost is present and into the egr passage below. This engineering feat in stock form uses copper washers to "seal" boost from entering the stud holes and entering the oil valley or egr passage. Originally when I ran the kit last year I had run it without these washers because I had bought the kit used and they were not included.

Normally I would just attept to recreate the mounting as it was originally designed but due to the pop off slab and the fact that I mini welded egr block off plates on the cylinder heads I had to come up with a slightly different approach.

Since I also wanted to be able to unbolt the supercharger from the top side posed another challange.

The solution ended up being a series of studs that attach the fortal pop off slab onto the lower manifold , however these studs only penetrate the upper mounting holes. Frome below the old exsisting stud hole provisions were tapped and bolts with teflon tape were screwed into place to keep the boost where it should be , in the plenum , not the oil valley.

With the aluminum slab mounted I then had to take two identical pieces of 6061 1/4" aluminum and mount one to the slab and another to the supercharger bottom. This required drilling the mounting holes as well as counter sinking them 3/32" and then drilling blanks out of the opposite plate so the allen heads would not interfere with the mating of the two plates. I used the 8 holes on the base of the blower to mount one section and 6 bolts to mount the other plate to the slab using helicoils. Then each piece had to be cut out to allow air to folw through them, meanwhile all this had to be mocked up in the engine bay to make sure it was all inline with the belt system.

Today I have to clean all the parts and handmake gaskets, then all I have to do Is wait for the headers to come back from jet hot , assemble, wire then Its should come alive!

http://614streets.com/blowerfabcompleted.jpg

http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket2.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket3.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket4.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket6.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket7.jpg



614Streets is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 05:32 PM
  #29  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 05:34 PM
  #30  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
i want one! 614, you mentioned the tbi setup...you mean a tb like the one pictured above? would there be any way to keep the computer and that sort of stuff or not?
Just grab a 747 ecu and wire it up with a tbi, would be easy to do.
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 05:38 PM
  #31  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by camaro_junkie
614Streets: So I assume some sort of intake system sits on top of the blower where those studs are sticking out? What does that look like?
From Fageol himself there are either the 2.8 rochester varajet carb units(came stock on carbed f body 2.8's) or the tbi top for s-10's. Mine is not stock and is a custom fab job for drag race performance and no emmisions / smog. Full drag race. If you wanted you could scrap the fuel injection and just make a simple 4 barrel carb adapter. I can make them at very low cost.
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 05:45 PM
  #32  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BitchinRS

As far as the CARB # isn't that just for the original application it was desgined for (Chevy s-10), and if it is modified is no longer good?
The firebird and camaro came stock with a varajet 2 barrel carb. Fageols basic kit is for this application and is smog legal. I used to own an 1984 firebird se with a 2.8 v6 and it had the varajet carb. Would bolt right up. For mpfi , no. Just switch ecu and rewire to the tbi and order with the tbi top.

Use a vortech 8 rib for serpentine setups and contact me on how to set up, for older f- bodys with vee belt , fageol has the pulley system and it is set up with cog. (serpentine 2.8 water pump spins backwards, vee belt 2.8 water pump spins clockwise.

Will clear carb legal with either tbi or varajet stock kits.
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 07:45 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
614Streets: You said, and Mark said that Fageol made a MPFI SC for the Fiero... I think. I was just trying to picture how that would all fit together.
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 08:15 PM
  #34  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cannot find the picture on the fiero forum a guy had of it.
I did find this used one some guy on fiero forum is try to use. Note the tbi top http://www.fiero.nl/uploads/imgs2003/SuperChrgr_1.jpg
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-06-2003, 09:42 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Lee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 BMW 535i
Engine: 3.5L M30
Transmission: 4HP22E
When i get my turbo Firebird done, i might go ahead and do a blown S10 with a 3.4 in it. I need a truck anyways.
Lee7 is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 11:29 AM
  #36  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jet hot sends my black jacks back :hail:
http://614streets.com/JETHOTV6.jpg

614Streets is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 02:26 PM
  #37  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
those look really nice! i was trying to figure out what kind they were, then i remembered...S-10....right? how big are the collectors on those? how much did jet hot charge for that?
AM91Camaro_RS is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 05:24 PM
  #38  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AM91Camaro they cost $195 plus shipping to get coated. Collectors are 2 1/2" , yup chevy s-10. Im trying to get some of my gm brothers to do up their 2.8/3.1/3.4 .
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 07:03 PM
  #39  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
what kind of times does that truck run? my camaro has gone 9.67 and 74 mph in the 1/8 with a 3.1. right now, i'm looking into building a 3.4 and getting one of those superchargers.
AM91Camaro_RS is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 10:14 PM
  #40  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
what kind of times does that truck run? my camaro has gone 9.67 and 74 mph in the 1/8 with a 3.1. right now, i'm looking into building a 3.4 and getting one of those superchargers.
Mid 14's on a 75 shot with the 110,000 mile stock engine no supercharger. I have no Idea how fast the new one will be ? 13's , 12's?
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 11:11 PM
  #41  
Junior Member
 
BlazerMaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the risk of sounding like an idiot, where did you get those headers 614Streets?

I like the idea of having a choice other than Edelbrock, but the only Black Jack that I know of is DynoMax, and they don't list headers for our trucks in their catalog. Are they discontinued, or is it another company that makes them?
BlazerMaro is offline  
Old 10-07-2003, 11:36 PM
  #42  
Member

 
614Streets's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah they are a set of old New Old stock Black Jacks I got from a guy in california , actually I bout them on ebay. I was really lucky to find them and they fit so good for a full header Im just so happy. Sadly like most 2.8 speed parts from the eighties these are discontinued.

Heddman still makes 2.8 v6 headers for s-10's both 2wd and 4wd. The 4wd appear to be full lenth but the 2wd look like 3/4. I reaserched them befor I found these. They are available from Summit or jegs and you can order them coated with hedmans htc process. I had the edelbrocks previously and although they fit good, they arent true headers and the drivers side is a measly 1 1/4 primary while the passenger side is 1 1/2. Yuck. They made them like that to match the edelbrock manifold which has supersmall drivers side runners and larger passenger side runners. Some of the goofs at edelbrock from the eighties thought it would be cute to have 1 bank make low end torque and the other make upper end power. Ironic it was never applied again and the technique is extinct. Good luck , if you keep tabs on ebay the blackjacks or cyclones may pop up.
614Streets is offline  
Old 10-08-2003, 11:59 PM
  #43  
Junior Member
 
BlazerMaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a feeling I wouldn't be able to just go out and buy them.

I agree about the Edelbrock ones, they didn't seem worth it to me. I didn't know they had done that with the different sides though, sounds about par for them.

Thanks for the steer on the Hedman ones, didn't find those in my searching. I'll have to look into those. (And watch eBay!) That is one beautiful set you have though, you'll have to post pics when you're done. Love seeing ppl still keeping our trucks alive.
BlazerMaro is offline  
Old 10-10-2003, 11:32 AM
  #44  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
LT1guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by Gumby
Its no big deal. Just looks kind of crappy when a company can not even "afford" [ I assume afford as it all a matter of money] a decent web page with product info pics and more. It is a fair price for the asking it just makes me wonder. When I goto buy computer parts or most things off the web, the first thing I do is check out the webpage. A webpage is like the front office. If you walked off the street into the front office and all they had was a lawn chair and a 8in B&W TV, with some fat guy eating nacho's, you will most likley go else where.


So whats up with your pop off valve??? what that for? Like a BOV or an anti backfire thingy??? Looks very interesting. Post more pics if you wish.


Matt
There are plenty of legitimate businesses with lousy, or no, wesbites. Ever click a link from a spam email? They usually have slick websites, because they have to...its the only way they're going to get in your pocket! Its sure not due to word of mouth, which is the "best: form of advertising and what most talented automotive shops rely on. Sure, I wish everybody had a nice, well organized and helpful website, but a lot of companies don't, even now.

That blower setup looks slick as hell BTW...
LT1guy is offline  
Old 10-19-2003, 01:21 AM
  #45  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
spjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have foun Two different superchargers for the 2.8 howerver. They both tell me that they will only work with the iron heads. can someone tell me when the stoped using the iron heads?
spjim is offline  
Old 10-19-2003, 01:25 AM
  #46  
Supreme Member
 
Doward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Aluminum heads were the Gen II (?) heads used on FWD vehicles.
Doward is offline  
Old 10-19-2003, 12:53 PM
  #47  
Supreme Member

 
camaro_junkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Where did you find these superchargers?
camaro_junkie is offline  
Old 10-19-2003, 01:45 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
The_Raven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Iron heads were used on RWD vehicles, none were equipped with aluminium heads. I think the last iron head 660 was the F-body 3.4, as far as factory installed iron heads goes. GM still offers an iron head 3.4 crate engine.

Aluminium heads were used strickly on FWD cars, from '87 to the present. Previousl to '87 FWD 660 equiped cars had iron heads. The early '90s Lumina APV (minivan) also had iron heads even though it was FWD.
The_Raven is offline  
Old 11-12-2013, 02:35 PM
  #49  
Member
 
SpecialEditon84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6

turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6-mandy-359.jpgLooks good. I picked up some flat black headers for my 2.8 and im planning on a nice procharger or something
SpecialEditon84 is offline  
Old 11-12-2013, 03:23 PM
  #50  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
OdieTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 3.4L V6
Transmission: T5 (NWC)
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock axle
Re: turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6

Wow! 10 year old thread brought back to life! Necroposting FTW!
OdieTurbo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cheesehomer
Power Adders
91
12-31-2015 08:48 AM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
11-12-2015 03:35 PM
bjpotter
History / Originality
17
10-04-2015 07:48 PM
usafirebird
Engine Swap
3
09-29-2015 11:58 PM
spartanreaper
Engine Swap
12
09-25-2015 07:22 PM



Quick Reply: turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.