turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6
#1
turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6
can somone out there tell me if there is someone out there with a Calif smoge leagel turbo or supercharger kit for a 88 2.8 V6? I can't seam to find anything on the older cars. Thanks
#2
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UCIrvine or SFV, CA
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1999 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LS1 - 346 ci
Transmission: 4L60E
Please read the sticky at the top.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=171305
Right now headers from Pacesetter are being cleared for CARB. That's probably the best you can do. Otherwise we're SOL because any power adder will have to be custom, and that will not pass smog.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=171305
Right now headers from Pacesetter are being cleared for CARB. That's probably the best you can do. Otherwise we're SOL because any power adder will have to be custom, and that will not pass smog.
#4
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
It's a totally different mounting, block, tranny, everything, even the ECU.
Vortex and I are working on a turbo kit for your vehicle... unfortunately, I have no idea how to go about getting it smog legal.
That's if I even can, since it requires removal of the smog pump... but then, I don't believe all the 2.8's came with smog pumps...
Vortex and I are working on a turbo kit for your vehicle... unfortunately, I have no idea how to go about getting it smog legal.
That's if I even can, since it requires removal of the smog pump... but then, I don't believe all the 2.8's came with smog pumps...
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Doward
It's a totally different mounting, block, tranny, everything, even the ECU.
It's a totally different mounting, block, tranny, everything, even the ECU.
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Originally posted by 89V6FBIRD
Right now headers from Pacesetter are being cleared for CARB.
Right now headers from Pacesetter are being cleared for CARB.
#7
Yes Fageol Superchargers in EL cajon California makes a supercharger kit that fits the gm 2.8 v6 and is smog legal. If you want Marks phone number I'll go grab it. Its isnt made for mpfi , although he did used to make mpfi 2.8 supercharger kits, If you have the cash he will make it. He does still have the basic 2.8 tbi and carb kits.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Well, that's news to me. At the beginning of the summer I would have been very interested in a supercharger kit. Unfortunately I spent all my money.
#9
Senior Member
614Streets,
Whats the number?????? Even if all he has is the SC I will work on making custom brakets and stuff. I'm just not sure what size SC to use. I mainly want to improve low end tourqe.
Whats the number?????? Even if all he has is the SC I will work on making custom brakets and stuff. I'm just not sure what size SC to use. I mainly want to improve low end tourqe.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Here is what I heard back from Fageol superchargers for those who are interested:
"The only 2.8 MPFI we made anything for was the Fiero. It had steel heads and we made a throttle body injection system and ran it with stock ECM with our chip. The basic S-10 kit will cost you $1250. It is hard to estimate fabrication costs to covert it to fit your vehicle. The installation involves removing intake manifold and installing supercharger intake manifold assembly and AC/ALT brackets. Call me at 619 447-1092 and I'll be happy to discuss it with you."
Is the Fiero engine the same as ours? That would make it easier if it was. Then he can probably do one up for someone. I'll inquire further when I get some money.
"The only 2.8 MPFI we made anything for was the Fiero. It had steel heads and we made a throttle body injection system and ran it with stock ECM with our chip. The basic S-10 kit will cost you $1250. It is hard to estimate fabrication costs to covert it to fit your vehicle. The installation involves removing intake manifold and installing supercharger intake manifold assembly and AC/ALT brackets. Call me at 619 447-1092 and I'll be happy to discuss it with you."
Is the Fiero engine the same as ours? That would make it easier if it was. Then he can probably do one up for someone. I'll inquire further when I get some money.
#12
Senior Member
The the fiero engines are basicly FWD engines. So no there are not the same, but it would most likely work with some fugging around.
it sounds like the only SC he has is the roots type. Now lets see if I can spell... I'm looking for a centerfugal type SC. The roots type are cool and all, but major PITA to trick the EPA ****'s with one. All though they do have thier advantages. I basicly want to make a setup that I can pull off my car every 2 years with minamal hassle and go pass the smog test with. Changing intake manifolds wont be an quick swap.
This is why I kept my original intake ducting. The they wont let me pass a smog test with my CIA setup. Just swap back to original coffe can style intake and they leave me alone for another 2 years.
it sounds like the only SC he has is the roots type. Now lets see if I can spell... I'm looking for a centerfugal type SC. The roots type are cool and all, but major PITA to trick the EPA ****'s with one. All though they do have thier advantages. I basicly want to make a setup that I can pull off my car every 2 years with minamal hassle and go pass the smog test with. Changing intake manifolds wont be an quick swap.
This is why I kept my original intake ducting. The they wont let me pass a smog test with my CIA setup. Just swap back to original coffe can style intake and they leave me alone for another 2 years.
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
I understood that he said the Fiero setup was MPFI. They have TBI setups for 2.8 blazers. But even if the Fiero engine was FWD, would that mean the intake was different?
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Someone should help out Mark over at Fageolsuperchargers.com I mean for a product name like that to have a 99 cent 2nd grade html page, is not good for business. If they can't even afford to put up a decent $5 web page, how can you trust them with $1300. I wonder if they even make their products or its all a front for someone else???
A company without a good web page looks cheap, fake and might as well be on yahoo.
Matt
A company without a good web page looks cheap, fake and might as well be on yahoo.
Matt
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
Ask 614Streets about the company. Maybe he knows he knows if they have credibility. Mark did send me some drawings, so maybe that means something. But even if they do have a $.02 web page, if they make a SC for the 2.8 for a "reasonable" price, then I'll buy it.
Besides, maybe this company deals mostly in local business. I mean, I haven't seen Doward's super web page for his turbo kit company.
Besides, maybe this company deals mostly in local business. I mean, I haven't seen Doward's super web page for his turbo kit company.
#17
Gumby the Fageol family used to make trucks and buses, outboard boat engines , they were big. Now Mark runs the sho which his father ray used to own. I think its tough for mark to get all these emails he gets and have almost nobody go through with it. They make blower kits for harleys , full custom set ups , the toyota 22r , the gm 2.8. His blowers and company are well documented and are even in the book street supercharging.
If people would read what I type maybe some of you would understand that the GM 2.8 kit was 50 state emisions legal. It is crazy to see the gm 2.8 manifold. It features and egr passage inside the lower manifold and the egr mountson the tbi or carb top. It really is a magnificent blower kit. Of course there are ways to fabricate a centrifugal blower with tubing and a bracket but for the gm 2.8 v6 the roots blower will be the best power adder for it adds power linear with rpm and torque is improved much better than in another application.
I just had my Fageol rebuilt and even though I have an s10 and tbi it would be easy to go to mpfi with it. I added a pop off valve on mine which required a spacer between the manifold and supercharger but now you can see how easy mpfi would be with a spacer like this.
Also rortwein@comcast.net has a NOS B&M 2.8 , 3.1 , 3.4 blower kit for sale. You have to get creative but why not you have nothing to loose and a hell of alot less work than a turbo.
If people would read what I type maybe some of you would understand that the GM 2.8 kit was 50 state emisions legal. It is crazy to see the gm 2.8 manifold. It features and egr passage inside the lower manifold and the egr mountson the tbi or carb top. It really is a magnificent blower kit. Of course there are ways to fabricate a centrifugal blower with tubing and a bracket but for the gm 2.8 v6 the roots blower will be the best power adder for it adds power linear with rpm and torque is improved much better than in another application.
I just had my Fageol rebuilt and even though I have an s10 and tbi it would be easy to go to mpfi with it. I added a pop off valve on mine which required a spacer between the manifold and supercharger but now you can see how easy mpfi would be with a spacer like this.
Also rortwein@comcast.net has a NOS B&M 2.8 , 3.1 , 3.4 blower kit for sale. You have to get creative but why not you have nothing to loose and a hell of alot less work than a turbo.
#18
Also if for some reason you dont like the gm tbi(?) you have other options . I was looking into this
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33558
. Imagine that on top of a blower!
I almost have all my fabrication done. You guys wont belive my set up when you see it.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...category=33558
. Imagine that on top of a blower!
I almost have all my fabrication done. You guys wont belive my set up when you see it.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Its no big deal. Just looks kind of crappy when a company can not even "afford" [ I assume afford as it all a matter of money] a decent web page with product info pics and more. It is a fair price for the asking it just makes me wonder. When I goto buy computer parts or most things off the web, the first thing I do is check out the webpage. A webpage is like the front office. If you walked off the street into the front office and all they had was a lawn chair and a 8in B&W TV, with some fat guy eating nacho's, you will most likley go else where.
So whats up with your pop off valve??? what that for? Like a BOV or an anti backfire thingy??? Looks very interesting. Post more pics if you wish.
Matt
So whats up with your pop off valve??? what that for? Like a BOV or an anti backfire thingy??? Looks very interesting. Post more pics if you wish.
Matt
#21
Matt I need the pop off for this, I am running nitrous with the tbi commander 950 stand alone with tech edge v 2.0 wide band and the fageol on a 2.8 with l249f forged pistons and a new block I built with a int balance crank and hastings gapped rings at .020 tops and .025 seconds.
The pop off will prevent damage to the blower if the nitrous backfires inside the manifold.
Note the fageol normally does not sit on this spacer(will clear stock hoods from fageol) and I am fabing mine up according to my specs and how I want it laid out. Also not Fageol does supply both carb or tbi tops , I choose to make my own to have the tbi inline with the blowers inlet and I am not running it with the egr like last year.
The pop off will prevent damage to the blower if the nitrous backfires inside the manifold.
Note the fageol normally does not sit on this spacer(will clear stock hoods from fageol) and I am fabing mine up according to my specs and how I want it laid out. Also not Fageol does supply both carb or tbi tops , I choose to make my own to have the tbi inline with the blowers inlet and I am not running it with the egr like last year.
#22
Lastly this is how low it sits normally on the 2.8 application http://614streets.com/rebuiltkf2.jpg
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
i want one! 614, you mentioned the tbi setup...you mean a tb like the one pictured above? would there be any way to keep the computer and that sort of stuff or not?
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
614Streets: So I assume some sort of intake system sits on top of the blower where those studs are sticking out? What does that look like?
#27
Senior Member
I wanted to go with a centrifugal vs. the rotts type becuase The TBI setup would require me to either figure out how to drive the injectors. Or to do it with MPFI I would have to drill and tap the manifold and make a cusotm fuel rail. I want to keep fabricating to as little as possible.
I do understand the benifits of the roots type, but don't have much free time for a bunch custom fab.
As far as the CARB # isn't that just for the original application it was desgined for (Chevy s-10), and if it is modified is no longer good?
I do understand the benifits of the roots type, but don't have much free time for a bunch custom fab.
As far as the CARB # isn't that just for the original application it was desgined for (Chevy s-10), and if it is modified is no longer good?
#28
Supercharger Fabrication completed
The Fageol supercharger kit made for the Iron head 2.8 v6 has a low profile manifold that allows it to clear stock hoods. Because of this the manifold has no provision for any pop off plate whatsoever. Being the the 60 degree v6 is so narrow , this manifold is already extended in its design to allow for the long and narrow extruded max 25 Fageol supercharger and therefore the front features the thermostat mount as well as three thermocouple bosses for various sensors.
The manifold also features a 50 state legal egr passage system which runs under the plenum area. Because of these features no extra space is available anywhere for a pop off. Under the normal usage of the supercharger kit a pop off is not nessesary. Reasons for this include the serpentine belt slipping if a backfire were to occour and moderate boost levels.
In my circumstance the supercharger will be run at higher boost levels and will also be aided with the wet 5153 tbi nos nitrous system.
I felt it nessesary to provide a escape path for the air to travel in the event that a backfire should occour. The smallest BDS backfire plate kit part number BDS-8026AK was aquired from Good Vibrations Motorsports in Whittier Califorina(1-562-945-7669) www.dragparts.com .
The fortal and 6061 aluminum used for the project was aquired from WWW.EBAY.COM and from sellers sciparts and speedymetals. The fortal bar just happened to be the right sized scrap which I had actually purchased for the Novas front and rear resevior Wet intercooler project , but oddly it ended up being just right to pursue the project.
The other aluminum I used was 6061 1/4" thick.
I first had the grueling task of cutting through the solid fortal slab with non other than a drill press to initiate the saw entry , then finished of with a skillsaw as well as a sawzall. Ironically despite many hours of cutting neither saws ruined a single blade. I am definately having the Nova intercooler water jet cut professionally but for this project the end results wre good and kept cost to a minimum.
The top half of the induction uses a holley tbi 670 cfm unit with a 5153 nos plate sitting on top of a 670 to 4 barrell holley adapter. The holley adapter sits on a fabricated 1/4" thick piece of 6061 aluminum rounding out the upper induction.
Below is where things got tricky. The stock fageol series superchargers mount with studs that are screwed into the case just adjecent to the case outlet. Stock studs protrude through the lower manifold and are secured with special nuts from the underside. Some of the studs because of their proximity to the lower manifold plenum protrude into the actual area where boost is present and into the egr passage below. This engineering feat in stock form uses copper washers to "seal" boost from entering the stud holes and entering the oil valley or egr passage. Originally when I ran the kit last year I had run it without these washers because I had bought the kit used and they were not included.
Normally I would just attept to recreate the mounting as it was originally designed but due to the pop off slab and the fact that I mini welded egr block off plates on the cylinder heads I had to come up with a slightly different approach.
Since I also wanted to be able to unbolt the supercharger from the top side posed another challange.
The solution ended up being a series of studs that attach the fortal pop off slab onto the lower manifold , however these studs only penetrate the upper mounting holes. Frome below the old exsisting stud hole provisions were tapped and bolts with teflon tape were screwed into place to keep the boost where it should be , in the plenum , not the oil valley.
With the aluminum slab mounted I then had to take two identical pieces of 6061 1/4" aluminum and mount one to the slab and another to the supercharger bottom. This required drilling the mounting holes as well as counter sinking them 3/32" and then drilling blanks out of the opposite plate so the allen heads would not interfere with the mating of the two plates. I used the 8 holes on the base of the blower to mount one section and 6 bolts to mount the other plate to the slab using helicoils. Then each piece had to be cut out to allow air to folw through them, meanwhile all this had to be mocked up in the engine bay to make sure it was all inline with the belt system.
Today I have to clean all the parts and handmake gaskets, then all I have to do Is wait for the headers to come back from jet hot , assemble, wire then Its should come alive!
http://614streets.com/blowerfabcompleted.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket2.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket3.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket4.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket6.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket7.jpg
The manifold also features a 50 state legal egr passage system which runs under the plenum area. Because of these features no extra space is available anywhere for a pop off. Under the normal usage of the supercharger kit a pop off is not nessesary. Reasons for this include the serpentine belt slipping if a backfire were to occour and moderate boost levels.
In my circumstance the supercharger will be run at higher boost levels and will also be aided with the wet 5153 tbi nos nitrous system.
I felt it nessesary to provide a escape path for the air to travel in the event that a backfire should occour. The smallest BDS backfire plate kit part number BDS-8026AK was aquired from Good Vibrations Motorsports in Whittier Califorina(1-562-945-7669) www.dragparts.com .
The fortal and 6061 aluminum used for the project was aquired from WWW.EBAY.COM and from sellers sciparts and speedymetals. The fortal bar just happened to be the right sized scrap which I had actually purchased for the Novas front and rear resevior Wet intercooler project , but oddly it ended up being just right to pursue the project.
The other aluminum I used was 6061 1/4" thick.
I first had the grueling task of cutting through the solid fortal slab with non other than a drill press to initiate the saw entry , then finished of with a skillsaw as well as a sawzall. Ironically despite many hours of cutting neither saws ruined a single blade. I am definately having the Nova intercooler water jet cut professionally but for this project the end results wre good and kept cost to a minimum.
The top half of the induction uses a holley tbi 670 cfm unit with a 5153 nos plate sitting on top of a 670 to 4 barrell holley adapter. The holley adapter sits on a fabricated 1/4" thick piece of 6061 aluminum rounding out the upper induction.
Below is where things got tricky. The stock fageol series superchargers mount with studs that are screwed into the case just adjecent to the case outlet. Stock studs protrude through the lower manifold and are secured with special nuts from the underside. Some of the studs because of their proximity to the lower manifold plenum protrude into the actual area where boost is present and into the egr passage below. This engineering feat in stock form uses copper washers to "seal" boost from entering the stud holes and entering the oil valley or egr passage. Originally when I ran the kit last year I had run it without these washers because I had bought the kit used and they were not included.
Normally I would just attept to recreate the mounting as it was originally designed but due to the pop off slab and the fact that I mini welded egr block off plates on the cylinder heads I had to come up with a slightly different approach.
Since I also wanted to be able to unbolt the supercharger from the top side posed another challange.
The solution ended up being a series of studs that attach the fortal pop off slab onto the lower manifold , however these studs only penetrate the upper mounting holes. Frome below the old exsisting stud hole provisions were tapped and bolts with teflon tape were screwed into place to keep the boost where it should be , in the plenum , not the oil valley.
With the aluminum slab mounted I then had to take two identical pieces of 6061 1/4" aluminum and mount one to the slab and another to the supercharger bottom. This required drilling the mounting holes as well as counter sinking them 3/32" and then drilling blanks out of the opposite plate so the allen heads would not interfere with the mating of the two plates. I used the 8 holes on the base of the blower to mount one section and 6 bolts to mount the other plate to the slab using helicoils. Then each piece had to be cut out to allow air to folw through them, meanwhile all this had to be mocked up in the engine bay to make sure it was all inline with the belt system.
Today I have to clean all the parts and handmake gaskets, then all I have to do Is wait for the headers to come back from jet hot , assemble, wire then Its should come alive!
http://614streets.com/blowerfabcompleted.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket2.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket3.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket4.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket6.jpg
http://614streets.com/Fageolgasket7.jpg
#30
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
i want one! 614, you mentioned the tbi setup...you mean a tb like the one pictured above? would there be any way to keep the computer and that sort of stuff or not?
i want one! 614, you mentioned the tbi setup...you mean a tb like the one pictured above? would there be any way to keep the computer and that sort of stuff or not?
#31
Originally posted by camaro_junkie
614Streets: So I assume some sort of intake system sits on top of the blower where those studs are sticking out? What does that look like?
614Streets: So I assume some sort of intake system sits on top of the blower where those studs are sticking out? What does that look like?
#32
Originally posted by BitchinRS
As far as the CARB # isn't that just for the original application it was desgined for (Chevy s-10), and if it is modified is no longer good?
As far as the CARB # isn't that just for the original application it was desgined for (Chevy s-10), and if it is modified is no longer good?
Use a vortech 8 rib for serpentine setups and contact me on how to set up, for older f- bodys with vee belt , fageol has the pulley system and it is set up with cog. (serpentine 2.8 water pump spins backwards, vee belt 2.8 water pump spins clockwise.
Will clear carb legal with either tbi or varajet stock kits.
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '86 Camaro SC, '16 QX60
Engine: 2.8 V6 POWER, 3.5L V6 N/A
Transmission: T-5, CVT
614Streets: You said, and Mark said that Fageol made a MPFI SC for the Fiero... I think. I was just trying to picture how that would all fit together.
#34
I cannot find the picture on the fiero forum a guy had of it.
I did find this used one some guy on fiero forum is try to use. Note the tbi top http://www.fiero.nl/uploads/imgs2003/SuperChrgr_1.jpg
I did find this used one some guy on fiero forum is try to use. Note the tbi top http://www.fiero.nl/uploads/imgs2003/SuperChrgr_1.jpg
#36
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
those look really nice! i was trying to figure out what kind they were, then i remembered...S-10....right? how big are the collectors on those? how much did jet hot charge for that?
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
what kind of times does that truck run? my camaro has gone 9.67 and 74 mph in the 1/8 with a 3.1. right now, i'm looking into building a 3.4 and getting one of those superchargers.
#40
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
what kind of times does that truck run? my camaro has gone 9.67 and 74 mph in the 1/8 with a 3.1. right now, i'm looking into building a 3.4 and getting one of those superchargers.
what kind of times does that truck run? my camaro has gone 9.67 and 74 mph in the 1/8 with a 3.1. right now, i'm looking into building a 3.4 and getting one of those superchargers.
#41
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At the risk of sounding like an idiot, where did you get those headers 614Streets?
I like the idea of having a choice other than Edelbrock, but the only Black Jack that I know of is DynoMax, and they don't list headers for our trucks in their catalog. Are they discontinued, or is it another company that makes them?
I like the idea of having a choice other than Edelbrock, but the only Black Jack that I know of is DynoMax, and they don't list headers for our trucks in their catalog. Are they discontinued, or is it another company that makes them?
#42
Yeah they are a set of old New Old stock Black Jacks I got from a guy in california , actually I bout them on ebay. I was really lucky to find them and they fit so good for a full header Im just so happy. Sadly like most 2.8 speed parts from the eighties these are discontinued.
Heddman still makes 2.8 v6 headers for s-10's both 2wd and 4wd. The 4wd appear to be full lenth but the 2wd look like 3/4. I reaserched them befor I found these. They are available from Summit or jegs and you can order them coated with hedmans htc process. I had the edelbrocks previously and although they fit good, they arent true headers and the drivers side is a measly 1 1/4 primary while the passenger side is 1 1/2. Yuck. They made them like that to match the edelbrock manifold which has supersmall drivers side runners and larger passenger side runners. Some of the goofs at edelbrock from the eighties thought it would be cute to have 1 bank make low end torque and the other make upper end power. Ironic it was never applied again and the technique is extinct. Good luck , if you keep tabs on ebay the blackjacks or cyclones may pop up.
Heddman still makes 2.8 v6 headers for s-10's both 2wd and 4wd. The 4wd appear to be full lenth but the 2wd look like 3/4. I reaserched them befor I found these. They are available from Summit or jegs and you can order them coated with hedmans htc process. I had the edelbrocks previously and although they fit good, they arent true headers and the drivers side is a measly 1 1/4 primary while the passenger side is 1 1/2. Yuck. They made them like that to match the edelbrock manifold which has supersmall drivers side runners and larger passenger side runners. Some of the goofs at edelbrock from the eighties thought it would be cute to have 1 bank make low end torque and the other make upper end power. Ironic it was never applied again and the technique is extinct. Good luck , if you keep tabs on ebay the blackjacks or cyclones may pop up.
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had a feeling I wouldn't be able to just go out and buy them.
I agree about the Edelbrock ones, they didn't seem worth it to me. I didn't know they had done that with the different sides though, sounds about par for them.
Thanks for the steer on the Hedman ones, didn't find those in my searching. I'll have to look into those. (And watch eBay!) That is one beautiful set you have though, you'll have to post pics when you're done. Love seeing ppl still keeping our trucks alive.
I agree about the Edelbrock ones, they didn't seem worth it to me. I didn't know they had done that with the different sides though, sounds about par for them.
Thanks for the steer on the Hedman ones, didn't find those in my searching. I'll have to look into those. (And watch eBay!) That is one beautiful set you have though, you'll have to post pics when you're done. Love seeing ppl still keeping our trucks alive.
#44
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Originally posted by Gumby
Its no big deal. Just looks kind of crappy when a company can not even "afford" [ I assume afford as it all a matter of money] a decent web page with product info pics and more. It is a fair price for the asking it just makes me wonder. When I goto buy computer parts or most things off the web, the first thing I do is check out the webpage. A webpage is like the front office. If you walked off the street into the front office and all they had was a lawn chair and a 8in B&W TV, with some fat guy eating nacho's, you will most likley go else where.
So whats up with your pop off valve??? what that for? Like a BOV or an anti backfire thingy??? Looks very interesting. Post more pics if you wish.
Matt
Its no big deal. Just looks kind of crappy when a company can not even "afford" [ I assume afford as it all a matter of money] a decent web page with product info pics and more. It is a fair price for the asking it just makes me wonder. When I goto buy computer parts or most things off the web, the first thing I do is check out the webpage. A webpage is like the front office. If you walked off the street into the front office and all they had was a lawn chair and a 8in B&W TV, with some fat guy eating nacho's, you will most likley go else where.
So whats up with your pop off valve??? what that for? Like a BOV or an anti backfire thingy??? Looks very interesting. Post more pics if you wish.
Matt
That blower setup looks slick as hell BTW...
#45
I have foun Two different superchargers for the 2.8 howerver. They both tell me that they will only work with the iron heads. can someone tell me when the stoped using the iron heads?
#46
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 3,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Chevy Camaro Hardtop
Engine: Turbocharged/Intercooled 3.1
Transmission: World Class T5 5 Speed
Aluminum heads were the Gen II (?) heads used on FWD vehicles.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Nest
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Iron heads were used on RWD vehicles, none were equipped with aluminium heads. I think the last iron head 660 was the F-body 3.4, as far as factory installed iron heads goes. GM still offers an iron head 3.4 crate engine.
Aluminium heads were used strickly on FWD cars, from '87 to the present. Previousl to '87 FWD 660 equiped cars had iron heads. The early '90s Lumina APV (minivan) also had iron heads even though it was FWD.
Aluminium heads were used strickly on FWD cars, from '87 to the present. Previousl to '87 FWD 660 equiped cars had iron heads. The early '90s Lumina APV (minivan) also had iron heads even though it was FWD.
#49
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: Pontiac 2.8 L V6
Transmission: Automatic 4spd
Axle/Gears: Stock
#50
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 3.4L V6
Transmission: T5 (NWC)
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock axle
Re: turbo or supercharging a 2.8 V6
Wow! 10 year old thread brought back to life! Necroposting FTW!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post